Development and Preliminary Validation of the Moral Reasoning Questionnaire for Secondary School Students

被引:6
作者
Lim, Lyndon [1 ,2 ]
Chapman, Elaine [3 ]
机构
[1] Singapore Univ Social Sci, Singapore, Singapore
[2] Singapore Examinat & Assessment Board, Singapore, Singapore
[3] Univ Western Australia, Perth, WA, Australia
来源
SAGE OPEN | 2022年 / 12卷 / 01期
关键词
moral reasoning; assessment; secondary education; validation; CONFIRMATORY FACTOR-ANALYSIS; SAMPLE-SIZE; CONSTRUCTION; EDUCATION; VALIDITY; VALUES; SCALE; LIFE;
D O I
10.1177/21582440221085271
中图分类号
C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 ; 0303 ;
摘要
Moral reasoning is a key element of the Singapore Ministry of Education's Character and Citizenship Education curriculum, and educators in Singapore are currently encouraged to facilitate growth in students' moral reasoning based on the Stages of Moral Development established by Lawrence Kohlberg. To monitor students' progress in this area, however, a validated test of moral reasoning is needed. A review of existing moral reasoning assessments indicated that none provide a practical means by which large numbers of students in Singapore classrooms can be assessed in this area. In this study, the Moral Reasoning Questionnaire (MRQ) was developed and validated to assess moral reasoning development in Singapore secondary classrooms. The MRQ presents moral dilemmas that integrate prosocial, anti-social, and social pressure elements within situations that would be familiar to Singapore secondary (grades 7-12, aged between 12 and 18) students. Evidence supported the reliability and validity of the MRQ. The MRQ could be applicable as a practical means to assess moral reasoning on a broad-scale basis.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 68 条
  • [1] THE MEASUREMENT OF VALUES IN SURVEYS - A COMPARISON OF RATINGS AND RANKINGS
    ALWIN, DF
    KROSNICK, JA
    [J]. PUBLIC OPINION QUARTERLY, 1985, 49 (04) : 535 - 552
  • [2] [Anonymous], 1958, THESIS U CHICAGO
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2009, PHILOS ISSUES, DOI DOI 10.1111/J.1533-6077.2009.00168.X
  • [4] [Anonymous], CONFIRMATORY FACTOR
  • [5] [Anonymous], 2013, OXFORD GUIDE PLAIN E
  • [6] Anzai Shinobu., 2014, Mediterranean Journal of Social Sciences, V5, P359
  • [7] Bandalos D.L., 2018, The reviewers guide to quantitative methods in the social sciences, P93, DOI DOI 10.4324/9781315755649
  • [8] VALIDATION OF THE SOCIOMORAL REFLECTION OBJECTIVE-MEASURE SHORT FORM
    BASINGER, KS
    GIBBS, JC
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL REPORTS, 1987, 61 (01) : 139 - 146
  • [9] Basto M, 2012, J STAT SOFTW, V46, P1
  • [10] Research synthesis: The practice of cognitive interviewing
    Beatty, Paul C.
    Willis, Gordon B.
    [J]. PUBLIC OPINION QUARTERLY, 2007, 71 (02) : 287 - 311