Uncertainty analysis in cross-calibration and optimization calculation of calibration coefficients

被引:3
|
作者
Gao Shuai [1 ]
Li Yuan [2 ]
Bai Ting-zhu [1 ]
Zhang Yu-xiang [2 ]
Zheng Xiao-bing [3 ]
机构
[1] Beijing Inst Technol, Sch Opt & Photon, Beijing 100081, Peoples R China
[2] China Meteorol Adm, Key Lab Radiometr Calibrat & Validat Environm Sat, Natl Satellite Meteorol Ctr, Beijing 100081, Peoples R China
[3] Chinese Acad Sci, Anhui Inst Opt & Fine Mech, Key Lab Opt Calibrat & Characterizat, Hefei 230031, Peoples R China
来源
CHINESE OPTICS | 2020年 / 13卷 / 03期
基金
中国国家自然科学基金; 国家重点研发计划;
关键词
radiance standard; solar reflective band; cross-calibration; weighted least square; uncertainty;
D O I
10.3788/CO.2019-0215
中图分类号
O43 [光学];
学科分类号
070207 ; 0803 ;
摘要
The general cross-calibration method uses the ordinary least square method to regress the calibration coefficient by data points selected after time, spatial, observation geometrics and spectral collocation. However, the ordinary least square algorithm would reduce the validity of the regressed result because of ignoring the differences in quality between each data point. An optimized method based on the calculation of uncertainty was proposed. This uncertainty analysis method was used to quantify the uncertainty of the radiation standard value for each data point, and their weight factors were calculated. The weighted least square method was used to regress the calibration coefficient. Using HYPERION as a radiance standard, the calibration coefficients of MODIS channels 1 to 7 were each regressed using the ordinary least squares method and the weighted least squares method. The regressed coefficients were compared with the official calibration coefficient. The results show that the calibration coefficients calculated using the weighted least squares method were closer to the official coefficients of MODIS channels 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, and 7. The maximum relative error reduced to 3%similar to 5% and the average relative error decreased to 0.5%similar to 1.5% compared with the ordinary least squares method, which indicates that the weighted least squares method proposed in this paper can further improve the calculation accuracy of cross-calibration.
引用
收藏
页码:568 / 576
页数:9
相关论文
共 18 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2007, Earth Science and Applications from Space: National Imperatives for the Next Decade and Beyond
  • [2] Four years of Aqua MODIS on-orbit radiometric calibration
    Barnes, W.
    Xiong, X.
    Xie, X.
    Wu, A.
    Chiang, K.
    Sun, J.
    Salomonson, V.
    Guenther, B.
    [J]. SENSORS, SYSTEMS, AND NEXT-GENERATION SATELLITES X, 2006, 6361
  • [3] CEOS W M O GSICS, 2019, SI TRACEABLE SPACE B
  • [4] Assessment of Spectral, Misregistration, and Spatial Uncertainties Inherent in the Cross-Calibration Study
    Chander, Gyanesh
    Helder, Dennis L.
    Aaron, David
    Mishra, Nischal
    Shrestha, Alok K.
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING, 2013, 51 (03): : 1282 - 1296
  • [5] Overview of Intercalibration of Satellite Instruments
    Chander, Gyanesh
    Hewison, Tim J.
    Fox, Nigel
    Wu, Xiangqian
    Xiong, Xiaoxiong
    Blackwell, William J.
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING, 2013, 51 (03): : 1056 - 1080
  • [6] CHEN SL, 2018, SHENGTAI XUEBAO ACTA, V38, P1, DOI DOI 10.5846/STXB201610202152
  • [7] Radiometric inter-sensor cross-calibration uncertainty using a traceable high accuracy reference hyperspectral imager
    Gorrono, Javier
    Banks, Andrew C.
    Fox, Nigel P.
    Underwood, Craig
    [J]. ISPRS JOURNAL OF PHOTOGRAMMETRY AND REMOTE SENSING, 2017, 130 : 393 - 417
  • [8] HUNG K W, 2010, P 2010 IEEE INT C IM
  • [9] JCGM, 2008, JOINT COMMITTEE GUID, V101
  • [10] Uncertainty Estimates for Imager Reference Inter-Calibration With CLARREO Reflected Solar Spectrometer
    Lukashin, Constantine
    Wielicki, Bruce A.
    Young, David F.
    Thome, Kurt
    Jin, Zhonghai
    Sun, Wenbo
    [J]. IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE SENSING, 2013, 51 (03): : 1425 - 1436