Integrating Everything: The Molecule Selection Toolkit, a System for Compound Prioritization in Drug Discovery

被引:27
作者
Cummins, David J. [1 ]
Bell, Michael A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Eli Lilly & Co, 893 South Delaware St, Indianapolis, IN 46285 USA
关键词
MULTIPARAMETER OPTIMIZATION; LIGAND EFFICIENCY; DESIGN; CANDIDATES; RULES;
D O I
10.1021/acs.jmedchem.5b01338
中图分类号
R914 [药物化学];
学科分类号
100701 ;
摘要
In recent years there have been numerous papers on the topic of multiattribute optimization in pharmaceutical discovery chemistry, applied to compound prioritization. Many solutions proposed are static in nature; fixed functions are proposed for general purpose use. As needs change, these are modified and proposed as the latest enhancement. Rather than producing one more set of static functions, this work proposes a flexible approach to prioritizing compounds. Most published approaches also lack a design component. This work describes a comprehensive implementation that includes predictive modeling, multiattribute optimization, and modern statistical design. This gives a complete package for effectively prioritizing compounds for lead generation and lead optimization. The approach described has been used at our company in various stages of discovery since 2001. An adaptable system alleviates the need for different static solutions, each of which inevitably must be updated as the needs of a project change.
引用
收藏
页码:6999 / 7010
页数:12
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]  
Bacha P., 2007, CLUSTERING METHODS T
[2]   A simple approach for indexing the oral druglikeness of a compound: Discriminating druglike compounds from nondruglike ones [J].
Biswas, Dhrubajyoti ;
Roy, Sujata ;
Sen, Srikanta .
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL INFORMATION AND MODELING, 2006, 46 (03) :1394-1401
[3]   DIFFERENTIAL IMPACT OF ABSTRACT VS CONCRETE INFORMATION ON DECISIONS [J].
BORGIDA, E ;
NISBETT, RE .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1977, 7 (03) :258-271
[4]   Desirability-Based Methods of Multiobjective Optimization and Ranking for Global QSAR Studies. Filtering Safe and Potent Drug Candidates from Combinatorial Libraries [J].
Cruz-Monteagudo, Maykel ;
Borges, Fernanda ;
Cordeiro, M. Natalia D. S. ;
Cagide Fajin, J. Luis ;
Morell, Carlos ;
Molina Ruiz, Reinaldo ;
Canizares-Carmenate, Yudith ;
Rosa Dominguez, Elena .
JOURNAL OF COMBINATORIAL CHEMISTRY, 2008, 10 (06) :897-913
[5]  
Cummins D.J., 2006, SCREENING METHODS EX, P69, DOI [10.1007/0-387-28014-6_4, DOI 10.1007/0-387-28014-6_4]
[6]   ALOHA: a novel probability fusion approach for scoring multi-parameter drug-likeness during the lead optimization stage of drug discovery [J].
Debe, Derek A. ;
Mamidipaka, Ravindra B. ;
Gregg, Robert J. ;
Metz, James T. ;
Gupta, Rishi R. ;
Muchmore, Steven W. .
JOURNAL OF COMPUTER-AIDED MOLECULAR DESIGN, 2013, 27 (09) :771-782
[7]  
Derringer G., 1980, J QUAL TECHNOL, V28, P61
[8]   Evolving molecules using multi-objective optimization: applying to ADME/Tox [J].
Ekins, Sean ;
Honeycutt, J. Dana ;
Metz, James T. .
DRUG DISCOVERY TODAY, 2010, 15 (11-12) :451-460
[9]  
García-Sosa AT, 2012, CURR MED CHEM, V19, P1646
[10]   Combinatorial library design using a multiobjective genetic algorithm [J].
Gillet, VJ ;
Khatib, W ;
Willett, P ;
Fleming, PJ ;
Green, DVS .
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL INFORMATION AND COMPUTER SCIENCES, 2002, 42 (02) :375-385