Explicit quantification of coastal cultural ecosystem services: A novel approach based on the content and sentimental analysis of social media

被引:43
作者
Cao, Haojie [1 ]
Wang, Miao [2 ]
Su, Shiliang [1 ]
Kang, Mengjun [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Wuhan Univ, Sch Resource & Environm Sci, Wuhan, Peoples R China
[2] Beijing Inst Surveying & Mapping, Beijing Key Lab Urban Spatial Informat Engn, Beijing, Peoples R China
关键词
Coastal areas; Social media; Cultural ecosystem services; Content analysis; Sentimental analysis; CES hotspots; HONG-KONG; VALUES; CONSERVATION; VALUATION; TOURISM;
D O I
10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.108756
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Ecosystem service assessments have been conducted for coastal management with a primary focus on tangible natural capital. Thus far, the explicit variation of cultural ecosystem services (CESs) and particularly the senti-ments of CES-related ecotourism are not well understood. This paper takes advantage of big social media data to unravel the patterns of CESs and visiting sentiments in coastal areas of Hong Kong. Through machine-learned keyword labels, we employed content analysis to derive visual information for geotagged photographs. Applying natural language processing to apps with machine learning in cloud computing, we derived the sen-timents based on user-generated textual content associated with coastal ecotourism. Based on regression analysis and multiple comparisons analysis, we identify the association between critical demographic and temporal factors with CES and related visiting sentiments. Referring to previous studies, we identified the main intangible benefits into six basic divisions based on 424 keyword labels for coastal areas. Our results show that hotspots of CESs are spatially concentrated in both cultural attractions and protected areas, which are critical for coastal ecosystem management and protection. More specifically, these areas of high CES value have good spatiotem-poral accessibility, high infrastructure coverage, and spatially explicit population and economic growth. Furthermore, we discover that sentiments related to coastal CESs vary based on social media characteristics. Our study renews the indicators of quantitative CES evaluation based on crowdsourcing geospatial data.
引用
收藏
页数:11
相关论文
共 72 条
[1]   Assessing landscape features and ecosystem services of marine protected areas through photographs on social media: comparison of two archipelagos in Spain [J].
Alieva, D. ;
Holgado, D. ;
de Juan, S. ;
Ruiz-Frau, A. ;
Villasante, S. ;
Maya-Jariego, I .
ENVIRONMENT DEVELOPMENT AND SUSTAINABILITY, 2022, 24 (07) :9623-9641
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2005, Millennium Ecosystem Assessment
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2018, One Ecosyst, DOI [DOI 10.3897/ONEECO.3.E24490, 10.3897/oneeco.3. e24490]
[4]  
Bi ML, 2020, ECOL INDIC, V116
[5]   An analysis of the relationships between multiple values and physical landscapes at a regional scale using public participation GIS and landscape character classification [J].
Brown, Greg ;
Brabyn, Lars .
LANDSCAPE AND URBAN PLANNING, 2012, 107 (03) :317-331
[6]  
Carreiro M.M., 2008, Ecology, Planning and Management of Urban Forests: International Perspectives
[7]   Social order, leisure, or tourist attraction? The changing planning missions for waterfront space in Hong Kong [J].
Cheung, Darren Man-wai ;
Tang, Bo-sin .
HABITAT INTERNATIONAL, 2015, 47 :231-240
[8]   Ecotourism service preference and management in Hong Kong [J].
Cheung, Lewis T. O. ;
Jim, C. Y. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT AND WORLD ECOLOGY, 2013, 20 (02) :182-194
[9]   Using geographically weighted models to explore how crowdsourced landscape perceptions relate to landscape physical characteristics [J].
Chien, Yi-Min Chang ;
Carver, Steve ;
Comber, Alexis .
LANDSCAPE AND URBAN PLANNING, 2020, 203
[10]   Combining social media photographs and species distribution models to map cultural ecosystem services: The case of a Natural Park in Portugal [J].
Clemente, Pedro ;
Calvache, Marta ;
Antunes, Paula ;
Santos, Rui ;
Cerdeira, Jorge Orestes ;
Martins, Maria Joao .
ECOLOGICAL INDICATORS, 2019, 96 :59-68