Efficient DNA barcode regions for classifying Piper species (Piperaceae)

被引:7
作者
Chaveerach, Arunrat [1 ,2 ]
Tanee, Tawatchai [2 ,3 ]
Sanubol, Arisa [1 ,2 ]
Monkheang, Pansa [1 ,2 ]
Sudmoon, Runglawan [2 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Khon Kaen Univ, Dept Biol, Fac Sci, Khon Kaen 40002, Thailand
[2] Khon Kaen Univ, Genet & Environm Toxicol GET Res Grp, Khon Kaen, Thailand
[3] Mahasarakham Univ, Fac Environm & Resource Studies, Maha Sarakham 44150, Thailand
[4] Khon Kaen Univ, Fac Law, Khon Kaen, Thailand
关键词
DNA barcoding; matK gene; Piper species; psbA-trnH spacer; rbcL gene; PLANTS; DIVERSITY; MARKERS; USAGES;
D O I
10.3897/phytokeys.70.6766
中图分类号
Q94 [植物学];
学科分类号
071001 ;
摘要
Piper species are used for spices, in traditional and processed forms of medicines, in cosmetic compounds, in cultural activities and insecticides. Here barcode analysis was performed for identification of plant parts, young plants and modified forms of plants. Thirty-six Piper species were collected and the three barcode regions, matK, rbcL and psbA-trnH spacer, were amplified, sequenced and aligned to determine their genetic distances. For intraspecific genetic distances, the most effective values for the species identification ranged from no difference to very low distance values. However, P. betle had the highest values at 0.386 for the matK region. This finding may be due to P. betle being an economic and cultivated species, and thus is supported with growth factors, which may have affected its genetic distance. The interspecific genetic distances that were most effective for identification of different species were from the matK region and ranged from a low of 0.002 in 27 paired species to a high of 0.486. Eight species pairs, P. kraense and P. dominantinervium, P. magnibaccum and P. kraense, P. phuwuaense and P. dominantinervium, P. phuwuaense and P. kraense, P. pilobracteatum and P. dominantinervium, P. pilobracteatum and P. kraense, P. pilobracteatum and P. phuwuaense and P. sylvestre and P. polysyphonum, that presented a genetic distance of 0.000 and were identified by independently using each of the other two regions. Concisely, these three barcode regions are powerful for further efficient identification of the 36 Piper species.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 10
页数:10
相关论文
共 26 条
[11]   Identification of birds through DNA barcodes [J].
Hebert, PDN ;
Stoeckle, MY ;
Zemlak, TS ;
Francis, CM .
PLOS BIOLOGY, 2004, 2 (10) :1657-1663
[12]   Barcoding animal life:: cytochrome c oxidase subunit 1 divergences among closely related species [J].
Hebert, PDN ;
Ratnasingham, S ;
deWaard, JR .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY B-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 2003, 270 :S96-S99
[13]   Choosing and Using a Plant DNA Barcode [J].
Hollingsworth, Peter M. ;
Graham, Sean W. ;
Little, Damon P. .
PLOS ONE, 2011, 6 (05)
[14]  
Kritpetcharat O, 2011, J MED PLANTS RES, V5, P3480
[15]   Medicinal parasitic plants on diverse hosts with their usages and barcodes [J].
Kwanda, Nantiya ;
Noikotr, Kowit ;
Sudmoon, Runglawan ;
Tanee, Tawatchai ;
Chaveerach, Arunrat .
JOURNAL OF NATURAL MEDICINES, 2013, 67 (03) :438-445
[16]   Pro-apoptotic effect of the landrace Bangla Mahoba of Piper betle on Leishmania donovani may be due to the high content of eugenol [J].
Misra, Pragya ;
Kumar, Awanish ;
Khare, Prashant ;
Gupta, Swati ;
Kumar, Nikhil ;
Dube, Anuradha .
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2009, 58 (08) :1058-1066
[17]   Species diversity, usages, molecular markers and barcode of medicinal Senna species (Fabaceae, Caesalpinioideae) in Thailand [J].
Monkheang, Pansa ;
Sudmoon, Runglawan ;
Tanee, Tawatchai ;
Noikotr, Kowit ;
Bletter, Nat ;
Chaveerach, Arunrat .
JOURNAL OF MEDICINAL PLANTS RESEARCH, 2011, 5 (26) :6173-6181
[18]   Testing candidate plant barcode regions in the Myristicaceae [J].
Newmaster, S. G. ;
Fazekas, A. J. ;
Steeves, R. A. D. ;
Janovec, J. .
MOLECULAR ECOLOGY RESOURCES, 2008, 8 (03) :480-490
[19]  
Sanubol A, 2014, CHIANG MAI J SCI, V41, P1171
[20]   A review of Piper spp. (Piperaceae) phytochemistry, insecticidal activity and mode of action [J].
Scott I.M. ;
Jensen H.R. ;
Philogène B.J.R. ;
Arnason J.T. .
Phytochemistry Reviews, 2008, 7 (1) :65-75