SecurAcath for Securing Peripherally Inserted Central Catheters: A NICE Medical Technology Guidance

被引:30
作者
Macmillan, Tom [1 ]
Pennington, Mark [2 ]
Summers, Jennifer A. [3 ]
Goddard, Kate [1 ]
Zala, Darshan [2 ]
Herz, Naomi [1 ]
Peacock, Janet L. [3 ]
Keevil, Stephen [1 ]
Chalkidou, Anastasia [1 ]
机构
[1] Kings Coll London, Sch Biomed Engn & Imaging Sci, Kings Technol Evaluat Ctr, 5th Floor,Becket House,1 Lambeth Palace Rd, London SE1 7EU, England
[2] Kings Coll London, Inst Psychiat Psychol & Neurosci, Kings Hlth Econ, London, England
[3] Kings Coll London, Sch Populat Hlth & Environm Sci, London, England
基金
英国工程与自然科学研究理事会;
关键词
NEEDLESTICK INJURIES; COST-EFFECTIVENESS; SECUREMENT; COMPLICATIONS; EFFICACY; SAFETY;
D O I
10.1007/s40258-018-0427-1
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Central venous catheters are commonly used to deliver therapies and to monitor patients, and require securing at the point of percutaneous entry to avoid dislodgement. SecurAcath is a catheter securement device designed for central venous catheters. The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, as a part of its Medical Technologies Evaluation Programme, selected this device for evaluation and invited the manufacturer, Interrad Medical, to submit clinical and economic evidence. The King's Technology Evaluation Centre, an External Assessment Centre commissioned by the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence, independently critiqued the manufacturer's submissions. The External Assessment Centre found a lack of evidence comparing SecurAcath with alternative approaches to securement (StatLock, suturing, tape securement), with one unpublished randomised controlled trial providing the strongest evidence. The External Assessment Centre conducted a new systematic review and meta-analysis and concluded that there is some evidence indicating the non-inferiority of SecurAcath compared to StatLock. The External Assessment Centre considered the manufacturer's economic model to be appropriate but made revisions to some parameters and noted significant heterogeneity in the included studies. The revised model indicated that StatLock was more cost effective than SecurAcath for catheter indwell times of up to 5days; however, for medium- and long-term indwell times, SecurAcath was the most cost-effective option. The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence Medical Technologies Guidance MTG 34, issued in June 2017, recommended the adoption of SecurAcath for securing peripherally inserted central catheters within the National Health Service in England.
引用
收藏
页码:779 / 791
页数:13
相关论文
共 42 条
  • [1] Complications associated with different insertion techniques for Hickman catheters
    Ahmed, Z
    Mohyuddin, Z
    [J]. POSTGRADUATE MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1998, 74 (868) : 104 - 107
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2015, MISERICORDIA PARENTE
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2015, ROYAL MARSD MAN CLIN
  • [4] [Anonymous], J VASC ACCESS, DOI DOI 10.5301/JVA.2011.6368
  • [5] Ballance P, 2012, EVALUATION PRODUCTS
  • [6] Boland A, 2003, HEALTH TECHNOL ASSES, V7, pi, DOI DOI 10.3310/HTA7360
  • [7] Chalkidou A, 2016, EXTERNAL ASSESSMENT
  • [8] A prospective trial on a new sutureless securement device for central venous catheters
    Cordovani, Daniel
    Cooper, Richard M.
    [J]. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF ANESTHESIA-JOURNAL CANADIEN D ANESTHESIE, 2013, 60 (05): : 504 - 505
  • [9] Curtis L., 2015, Unit Costs of Health and Social Care
  • [10] Djurcic-Jovan A, 2016, CAN VASC ACC ASS