Validation of the PRUCISION Instruments in Pediatric Patients with Progressive Familial Intrahepatic Cholestasis

被引:5
作者
Gwaltney, Chad [1 ]
Ivanescu, Cristina [2 ]
Karlsson, Lisa [3 ]
Warholic, Natalie [3 ]
Kjems, Lise [3 ]
Horn, Patrick [3 ]
机构
[1] Gwaltney Consulting, 1 Bucks Trail, Westerly, RI 02891 USA
[2] IQVIA, New York, NY USA
[3] Albireo Pharma Inc, Boston, MA USA
关键词
Liver diseases; Pruritus; Pediatrics; Validation study; Sleep quality; RELIABILITY; MANAGEMENT;
D O I
10.1007/s12325-022-02262-7
中图分类号
R-3 [医学研究方法]; R3 [基础医学];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
Plain Language Summary Progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis (PFIC) is a collection of liver diseases that typically affects very young children. A problematic symptom of PFIC is extremely itchy skin, or pruritus, that can keep patients and their families up at night. The PRUCISION questionnaire was developed to measure the severity of a patient's pruritus and sleep disturbance from the perspective of the patient's caregiver. The current study had two primary goals: (1) to assess whether PRUCISION could reliably measure these symptoms and detect changes over time relative to other established rating scales that assess related concepts, and (2) to identify what score change on PRUCISION could be considered clinically meaningful. To do this, data from a clinical study, called PEDFIC 1, in patients with PFIC were used: patient's scores on PRUCISION from their caregiver's perspective were compared with scores on other established scales, first before any treatment was given in PEDFIC 1, and then again after 24 weeks of treatment with a drug called odevixibat. In general, there was good agreement between PRUCISION scores and scores on other scales. For example, when PRUCISION scores indicated that symptoms improved, this tended to correlate with improvement on other measures. Additionally, these analyses indicated that if the PRUCISION score drops by 1 point or more, that can be considered a clinically important change. Overall, this study found that the caregiver-reported PRUCISION questionnaire is valid for assessing changes in pruritus and sleep symptoms in patients with PFIC, which may benefit patients as new treatments are developed. Introduction Patients with cholestatic liver disease, including progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis (PFIC) and Alagille syndrome, may have debilitating pruritus, and reducing pruritus is a key therapeutic goal. However, few instruments are available that adequately measure pruritus in pediatric patients with cholestatic liver disease. The objectives of the current study were to establish the measurement properties of the novel PRUCISION patient-reported outcome (PRO) and observer-reported outcome (ObsRO) instruments and to estimate a threshold for clinically meaningful change in pruritus score. Methods The PRO/ObsRO instruments are completed twice daily via electronic diary and include 5-point pictorial responses to assess pruritus. Sleep disturbance and tiredness were quantified using 5-point pictorial responses, yes/no responses, and numerical ratings. Data from PEDFIC 1 (NCT03566238), a phase 3 study evaluating odevixibat efficacy and safety in children with PFIC, were used to assess the psychometric properties of these instruments. Quantitative assessments included evaluation of test-retest reliability, determination of construct validity via convergent and known-group validity analyses, and characterization of sensitivity to change. A threshold for within-patient meaningful change from baseline to week 24 was determined using blinded data from PEDFIC 1 and distribution- and anchor-based analyses. Results Because the majority of patients in PEDFIC 1 were aged < 8 years (n = 52/62) and thus too young to complete the PRO instrument, which was intended for patients aged >= 8 years, the small sample size of patients who completed the PRO precluded a full psychometric analysis of the PRO instrument. The ObsRO was completed by a caregiver of every patient in PEDFIC 1. The ObsRO instrument had acceptable test-retest reliability based on intraclass correlation values (most > 0.75). Convergent validity analyses revealed moderate-to-strong correlations (r >= 0.3) between baseline ObsRO pruritus scores and baseline Global Impression of Symptoms (GIS) items. In known-groups validity analyses, there were significant differences between baseline groups defined by the GIS for ObsRO pruritus scores and for some sleep disturbance scores. Week 24 ObsRO scores were in the expected direction in groups defined by the Global Impression of Change scale (i.e., improved or not improved); many mean differences between these groups were significant. Sensitivity to change for the ObsRO PRUCISION instrument was also demonstrated by moderate-to-strong Pearson correlations between change from baseline to weeks 21-24 in ObsRO scores and GIS items (r >= 0.3). Based on these analyses, a within-patient change of -1.00 from baseline in ObsRO pruritus score was determined to be clinically meaningful. Conclusion The PRUCISION ObsRO instrument is reliable, valid, and sensitive to change, supporting its use as a tool to measure pruritus and sleep disturbance in patients with PFIC and other pediatric cholestatic liver diseases.
引用
收藏
页码:5105 / 5125
页数:21
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Epidemiology and burden of progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis: a systematic review
    Jones-Hughes, Tracey
    Campbell, Jo
    Crathorne, Louise
    ORPHANET JOURNAL OF RARE DISEASES, 2021, 16 (01)
  • [22] Partial internal biliary diversion for patients with progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis type 1
    Mochizuki, Kyoko
    Obatake, Masayuki
    Takatsuki, Mitsuhisa
    Nakatomi, Akiko
    Hayashi, Tomayoshi
    Okudaira, Sadayuki
    Eguchi, Susumu
    PEDIATRIC SURGERY INTERNATIONAL, 2012, 28 (01) : 51 - 54
  • [23] Outcomes following partial external biliary diversion in patients with progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis
    Lemoine, Caroline
    Bhardwaj, Tanya
    Bass, Lee M.
    Superina, Riccardo A.
    JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC SURGERY, 2017, 52 (02) : 268 - 272
  • [24] Biliary diversion in progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis: a systematic review and meta-analysis
    Bolia, Rishi
    Goel, Akhil Dhanesh
    Sharma, Vishakha
    Srivastava, Anshu
    EXPERT REVIEW OF GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY, 2022, 16 (02) : 163 - 172
  • [25] Expanding the spectrum of progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis A report of 3 cases
    Jiao, Jingjing
    Morotti, Raffaella
    Shafizadeh, Nafis
    Jain, Dhanpat
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PATHOLOGY, 2024, : 332 - 339
  • [26] Single-center experience in management of progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis
    Varol, Fatma Ilknur
    Selimoglu, Mukadder Ayse
    Gungor, Sukru
    Yilmaz, Sezai
    Tekedereli, Ibrahim
    ARAB JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2021, 22 (04) : 310 - 315
  • [27] Long-term outcome following cholecystocolostomy in 41 patients with progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis
    Qianqing Li
    Clara Chong
    Rui Sun
    Tong Yin
    Ting Huang
    Mei Diao
    Long Li
    Pediatric Surgery International, 2021, 37 : 723 - 730
  • [28] Long-term outcome following cholecystocolostomy in 41 patients with progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis
    Li, Qianqing
    Chong, Clara
    Sun, Rui
    Yin, Tong
    Huang, Ting
    Diao, Mei
    Li, Long
    PEDIATRIC SURGERY INTERNATIONAL, 2021, 37 (06) : 723 - 730
  • [29] Nasobiliary drainage prior to surgical biliary diversion in progressive familial intrahepatic cholestasis type II
    Jannone, Giulia
    Stephenne, Xavier
    Scheers, Isabelle
    Smets, Francoise
    de Magnee, Catherine
    Reding, Raymond
    Sokal, Etienne M.
    EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PEDIATRICS, 2020, 179 (10) : 1547 - 1552
  • [30] Progressive Familial Intrahepatic Cholestasis (PFIC) in Indian Children: Clinical Spectrum and Outcome
    Agarwal, Sajan
    Lal, Bikrant Bihari
    Rawat, Dinesh
    Rastogi, Archana
    Bharathy, Kishore G. S.
    Alam, Seema
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL AND EXPERIMENTAL HEPATOLOGY, 2016, 6 (03) : 203 - 208