Safety and efficacy of oral low-volume sodium phosphate bowel preparation for colonoscopy in dogs

被引:5
|
作者
Daugherty, M. A. [1 ]
Leib, M. S. [1 ]
Rossmeisl, J. H. [1 ]
Almy, F. S. [3 ]
Ward, D. L. [2 ]
机构
[1] Med Univ Georgia, Coll Vet Med, Dept Clin Sci, Athens, GA USA
[2] Med Univ Georgia, Coll Vet Med, Dept Biomed Sci & Pathobiol, Athens, GA USA
[3] Univ Georgia, Coll Vet Med, Dept Pathol, Athens, GA 30602 USA
关键词
colon; enema; hyperphosphatemia; hypocalcemia; polyethylene glycol;
D O I
10.1111/j.1939-1676.2007.0025.x
中图分类号
S85 [动物医学(兽医学)];
学科分类号
0906 ;
摘要
Background: Sodium phosphate (NaP) is a low-volume, hyperosmolar laxative that is an effective bowel-cleansing agent in humans. Hypothesis: NaP will be as safe and efficacious as polyethylene glycol (PEG) bowel preparation for colonoscopy in dogs. Animals: Eight purpose-bred healthy dogs. Methods: In phase I, standard (NaP and enemas; NaP1) and control preparations (PEG and enemas) were compared in a crossover design to determine the safety and efficacy of NaP. Serial clinical and serum analytical evaluations were used to determine the safety of NaP. In phase II, the efficacy of the standard NaP preparation was compared with 3 other NaP variations, which excluded enema or included bisacodyl, with or without enemas in a crossover design. An observer blinded to the bowel preparation assigned a score of 1-4 (1=clean colon; 4=unacceptable colon cleansing preventing adequate endoscopic evaluation) to each of 5 regions of the colon. Results: The mean total colon cleansing score (TCS), defined as the sum of scores from each region, of the control (9.4) was less than NaP1 (13.6) (P < 0.05). There were no significant differences in regional or TCS for the remaining 4 NaP protocols. NaP1 resulted in moderate, but clinically occult, hyperphosphatemia and hypocalcemia, which resolved within 24 hours. Conclusions and Clinical Importance: Despite the safety and ease of administration of the NaP preparations, the NaP bowel-cleansing preparations used in this study cannot be recommended for use because of the inadequate quality of bowel preparation compared with the protocol using PEG-containing fluids.
引用
收藏
页码:31 / 36
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Colonoscopy preparation in children: Safety, efficacy, and tolerance of high- versus low-volume cleansing methods
    daSilva, MM
    Briars, GL
    Patrick, MK
    Cleghorn, GJ
    Shepherd, RW
    JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC GASTROENTEROLOGY AND NUTRITION, 1997, 24 (01): : 33 - 37
  • [22] A comparative study of low-volume bowel preparation methods for colonoscopy; sodium picosulfate versus peg-asc
    Jeen, Yoon Tae
    Yoo, In Kyung
    Lee, Jae Min
    Kim, Seung Han
    Nam, Seung Joo
    Choi, Hyuk Soon
    Kim, Eun Sun
    Keum, Bora
    Lee, Hong Sik
    Chun, Hoon Jai
    Kim, Chang Duck
    JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2014, 29 : 81 - 81
  • [23] Safety, Efficacy, and Tolerability of a Low-Volume Sodium Picosulfate/Magnesium Citrate Bowel Preparation in Patients Aged 50 Years and Younger
    Bertiger, Gerald
    Willey, Richard
    Joseph, Raymond E.
    Barocas, Morris
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2015, 81 (05) : AB320 - AB320
  • [24] The efficacy for an additional intake of low-volume peg on a procedure-day in patients with poor bowel preparation for colonoscopy
    Lee, Mi Jung
    Chung, Yun Jin
    Kim, Hyun Soo
    Jung, Jae Kwon
    Lee, Dong Wook
    Park, Chang Keun
    Kim, Dae Jin
    Kim, Sang Dong
    Kim, Dong Hyun
    JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2014, 29 : 85 - 86
  • [26] Safety and Efficacy of a Same-Day Low-Volume 1 L PEG Bowel Preparation in Colonoscopy for the Elderly People and People with Renal Dysfunction
    Yoshida, Naohisa
    Naito, Yuji
    Murakami, Takaaki
    Hirose, Ryohei
    Ogiso, Kiyoshi
    Inada, Yutaka
    Dohi, Osamu
    Okayama, Tetsuya
    Kamada, Kazuhiro
    Uchiyama, Kazuhiko
    Ishikawa, Takeshi
    Handa, Osamu
    Konishi, Hideyuki
    Siah, Kewin Tien Ho
    Yagi, Nobuaki
    Itoh, Yoshito
    DIGESTIVE DISEASES AND SCIENCES, 2016, 61 (11) : 3229 - 3235
  • [27] Safety and Efficacy of a Same-Day Low-Volume 1 L PEG Bowel Preparation in Colonoscopy for the Elderly People and People with Renal Dysfunction
    Naohisa Yoshida
    Yuji Naito
    Takaaki Murakami
    Ryohei Hirose
    Kiyoshi Ogiso
    Yutaka Inada
    Osamu Dohi
    Tetsuya Okayama
    Kazuhiro Kamada
    Kazuhiko Uchiyama
    Takeshi Ishikawa
    Osamu Handa
    Hideyuki Konishi
    Kewin Tien Ho Siah
    Nobuaki Yagi
    Yoshito Itoh
    Digestive Diseases and Sciences, 2016, 61 : 3229 - 3235
  • [28] Tolerability, safety, and efficacy of sodium phosphate preparation for colonoscopy:: The role of age
    Rodriguez-Alcalde, D.
    Marin-Gabriel, J. C.
    Rodriguez-Munoz, S.
    Bertolo, J. de la Cruz
    Barreales-Valbuena, M.
    Manzano-Alonso, M. L.
    Solis-Herruzo, J. A.
    REVISTA ESPANOLA DE ENFERMEDADES DIGESTIVAS, 2008, 100 (01) : 17 - 23
  • [29] Low volume bowel preparation for colonoscopy:: Randomized, endoscopist-blinded trial of liquid sodium phosphate versus tablet sodium phosphate
    Balaban, DH
    Leavell, BS
    Oblinger, MJ
    Thompson, WO
    Bolton, ND
    Pambianco, DJ
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2003, 98 (04): : 827 - 832
  • [30] Sodium phosphate (NaP) oral colonoscopy bowel preparation: Effect of timing and dilution
    Silva, RG
    Ekambaram, A
    Berkelhammer, CH
    GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2001, 53 (05) : AB84 - AB84