Development and evaluation of a cpue-based harvest control rule for the southern and eastern scalefish and shark fishery of Australia

被引:47
作者
Little, L. Richard [1 ]
Wayte, Sally E. [1 ]
Tuck, Geoffrey N. [1 ]
Smith, Anthony D. M. [1 ]
Klaer, Neil [1 ]
Haddon, Malcolm [1 ]
Punt, Andre E. [1 ,2 ]
Thomson, Robin [1 ]
Day, Jemery [1 ]
Fuller, Mike [1 ]
机构
[1] CSIRO Marine & Atmospher Res & Wealth Oceans Flag, Hobart, Tas 7001, Australia
[2] Univ Washington, Sch Aquat & Fishery Sci, Seattle, WA 98195 USA
关键词
Australia; cpue; harvest control rule; management strategy evaluation; simulation; MANAGEMENT STRATEGY EVALUATION; CATCH; SYSTEMS; POLICY;
D O I
10.1093/icesjms/fsr019
中图分类号
S9 [水产、渔业];
学科分类号
0908 ;
摘要
Many fishery management agencies are adopting harvest control rules (HCRs) to achieve harvest policies and management objectives. HCRs, however, often require data-intensive stock assessments to facilitate the harvest prescription. An HCR based on catch and catch per unit effort (cpue) was developed for the southern and eastern scalefish and shark fishery of Australia, for stocks that lack the data needed to conduct a full statistical catch-at-age assessment. The HCR produces a recommended biological catch and is characterized by two parameters, target cpue and target catch, both derived from historical data. Simulation tests showed that the HCR could guide the stock to the desired state from different initial levels of depletion. However, the selection of parameter values for the HCR was critical. Achieving fishery objectives was difficult when the target catch was a function of recent catch, rather than data from a pre-defined historical reference period. Problems may also arise when specifying the reference period on which the HCR parameters are determined. The cpue-based HCR is a valuable tool for managing fisheries where monitoring and assessment activities are relatively expensive, or in general, where data are scarce.
引用
收藏
页码:1699 / 1705
页数:7
相关论文
共 30 条
  • [1] *AFMA, 2008, E GEMF STOCK REB STR
  • [2] Why a management procedure approach? Some positives and negatives
    Butterworth, Doug S.
    [J]. ICES JOURNAL OF MARINE SCIENCE, 2007, 64 (04) : 613 - 617
  • [3] CAMPBELL R, 2007, 3 WCPFC SCI COMM M H
  • [4] DAFF, 2007, COMM FISH HARV STRAT
  • [5] DAY J, 2007, STOCK ASSESSMENT SO, P374
  • [6] A review of harvest policies: Understanding relative performance of control rules
    Deroba, Jonathan J.
    Bence, James R.
    [J]. FISHERIES RESEARCH, 2008, 94 (03) : 210 - 223
  • [7] Management strategies for short lived species: The case of Australia's Northern Prawn Fishery 2. Choosing appropriate management strategies using input controls
    Dichmont, Catherine M.
    Deng, Aijun
    Punt, Andre E.
    Venables, William
    Haddon, Malcolm
    [J]. FISHERIES RESEARCH, 2006, 82 (1-3) : 221 - 234
  • [8] A Case Study in Successful Management of a Data-Poor Fishery Using Simple Decision Rules: the Queensland Spanner Crab Fishery
    Dichmont, Catherine M.
    Brown, Ian W.
    [J]. MARINE AND COASTAL FISHERIES, 2010, 2 (01): : 1 - 13
  • [9] Developing harvest strategies for low-value and data-poor fisheries: Case studies from three Australian fisheries
    Dowling, Natalie A.
    Smith, David C.
    Knuckey, Ian
    Smith, Anthony D. M.
    Domaschenz, Phil
    Patterson, Heather M.
    Whitelaw, Wade
    [J]. FISHERIES RESEARCH, 2008, 94 (03) : 380 - 390
  • [10] Fay G., 2009, Evaluation of new harvest strategies for SESSF species, P125