HOW PATIENT AGE AFFECTS TRIAGE IN THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC

被引:0
作者
Montanari-Vergallo, Gianluca [1 ]
机构
[1] Sapienza Univ Rome, Dept Anat Histol Med Legal & Orthopaed Sci, Legal Med & Bioeth, Rome, Italy
来源
MEDICINE AND LAW | 2021年 / 40卷 / 03期
关键词
Coronavirus (Covid 19); Italian Society of Anaesthesia; Analgesia; Reanimation and Intensive Care guidelines; Public Health Emergency; Health Care; Allocation of Scarce Resources; Age as a Prioritization Standard; CLINICAL ETHICS RECOMMENDATIONS; INTENSIVE-CARE TREATMENTS; DECISION-MAKING; ALLOCATION; MANAGEMENT; RIGHTS; LAW;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
D9 [法律]; DF [法律];
学科分类号
0301 ;
摘要
The Author draws upon a set of guidelines issued by the Italian Society of Anaesthesia, Analgesia, Reanimation and Intensive Care (ISAARIC) and discusses the role played by patient age, at the triage stage, as the Covid-19 pandemic relentlessly unfolds. The limiting standard for admitting patients to intensive care units that best serves in terms of transparency and equality is the "first come, first served" approach; yet, in times of pandemic, patient age carries substantial weight in that selection process. In order to avoid wasting available resources and to treat as many patients as possible, therapies are discontinued for patients who do not seem to positively respond to them (as it frequently happens with elderly patients) and given to those with better chances of survival. Age is even more relevant in relation to the prognosis-based standard. Preexisting conditions, commonly associated with old age, could preclude access to intensive care. In order to avoid age-based discrimination, a) age should constitute but one standard through which the patient's chances of survival are determined; b) residual life expectancy should be disregarded; c) patients should never be cut off from receiving intensive care based on their age alone. Considering the primacy of the right to life over any other, it could be deemed ethically admissible to exclude patients, from receiving intensive care, only after the government institutions have taken any possible organizational measure, aimed at broadening health care access, while avoiding wasteful spending in the public provision of services.
引用
收藏
页码:425 / 438
页数:14
相关论文
共 45 条
[1]  
BEAUCHAMP T, 1979, PRINCIPLESOF BIOMEDI
[2]  
Beran RG, 2020, MED LAW, V39, P89
[3]  
Beran RG, 2020, MED LAW, V39, P97
[4]  
CHRISTIAN M.D, 2010, INTENS CARE MED, V1, P55
[5]  
COUNCIL OF EUROPE, 2014, GUID DEC PROC REG ME, P9
[6]  
DOMINIONI I., 2020, LINKIESTA
[7]  
Duguet AM, 2020, MED LAW, V39, P173
[8]   Rationing Limited Healthcare Resources in the COVID-19 Era and Beyond: Ethical Considerations Regarding Older Adults [J].
Farrell, Timothy W. ;
Francis, Leslie ;
Brown, Teneille ;
Ferrante, Lauren E. ;
Widera, Eric ;
Rhodes, Ramona ;
Rosen, Tony ;
Hwang, Ula ;
Witt, Leah J. ;
Thothala, Niranjan ;
Liu, Shan W. ;
Vitale, Caroline A. ;
Braun, Ursula K. ;
Stephens, Caroline ;
Saliba, Debra .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, 2020, 68 (06) :1143-1149
[9]  
Ferraresi M, 2020, A coronavirus cautionary tale from Italy: Don't do whatwe did
[10]   First Come, First Served in the Intensive Care Unit: Always? [J].
Fleck, Leonard M. ;
Murphy, Timothy F. .
CAMBRIDGE QUARTERLY OF HEALTHCARE ETHICS, 2018, 27 (01) :52-61