Multiple Mechanisms in the Perception of Face Gender: Effect of Sex-Irrelevant Features

被引:39
作者
Komori, Masashi [1 ]
Kawamura, Satoru [2 ]
Ishihara, Shigekazu [3 ]
机构
[1] Osaka Electrocommun Univ, Fac Informat & Commun Engn, Osaka 5728530, Japan
[2] Osaka Univ, Sch Human Sci, Suita, Osaka 565, Japan
[3] Hiroshima Int Univ, Fac Psychol Sci, Hiroshima, Japan
基金
日本学术振兴会;
关键词
face perception; gender perception; facial features; FACIAL ATTRACTIVENESS; SHAPE; RECOGNITION; DIFFERENCE;
D O I
10.1037/a0020369
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
Effects of sex-relevant and sex-irrelevant facial features on the evaluation of facial gender were investigated. Participants rated masculinity of 48 male facial photographs and femininity of 48 female facial photographs. Eighty feature points were measured on each of the facial photographs. Using a generalized Procrustes analysis, facial shapes were converted into multidimensional vectors, with the average face as a starting point. Each vector was decomposed into a sex-relevant subvector and a sex-irrelevant subvector which were, respectively, parallel and orthogonal to the main male-female axis. Principal components analysis (PCA) was performed on the sex-irrelevant subvectors. One principal component was negatively correlated with both perceived masculinity and femininity, and another was correlated only with femininity, though both components were orthogonal to the male-female dimension (and thus by definition sex-irrelevant). These results indicate that evaluation of facial gender depends on sex-irrelevant as well as sex-relevant facial features.
引用
收藏
页码:626 / 633
页数:8
相关论文
共 40 条
  • [1] Bern S.L., 1974, Journal of Counseling and Clinical Psychology, V42, P155, DOI DOI 10.1037/H0036215
  • [2] Bookstein F. L., 1997, MORPHOMETRIC TOOLS L
  • [3] Facial correlates of sociosexuality
    Boothroyd, Lynda G.
    Jones, Benedict C.
    Burt, D. Michael
    DeBruine, Lisa M.
    Perrett, David I.
    [J]. EVOLUTION AND HUMAN BEHAVIOR, 2008, 29 (03) : 211 - 218
  • [4] WHAT GIVES A FACE ITS GENDER
    BROWN, E
    PERRETT, DI
    [J]. PERCEPTION, 1993, 22 (07) : 829 - 840
  • [5] SEX-DISCRIMINATION - HOW DO WE TELL THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN MALE AND FEMALE FACES
    BRUCE, V
    BURTON, AM
    HANNA, E
    HEALEY, P
    MASON, O
    COOMBES, A
    FRIGHT, R
    LINNEY, A
    [J]. PERCEPTION, 1993, 22 (02) : 131 - 152
  • [6] PARALLEL PROCESSING OF THE SEX AND FAMILIARITY OF FACES
    BRUCE, V
    ELLIS, H
    GIBLING, F
    YOUNG, A
    [J]. CANADIAN JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY-REVUE CANADIENNE DE PSYCHOLOGIE, 1987, 41 (04): : 510 - 520
  • [7] WHATS THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN MEN AND WOMEN - EVIDENCE FROM FACIAL MEASUREMENT
    BURTON, AM
    BRUCE, V
    DENCH, N
    [J]. PERCEPTION, 1993, 22 (02) : 153 - 176
  • [8] SEXUAL STRATEGIES THEORY - AN EVOLUTIONARY PERSPECTIVE ON HUMAN MATING
    BUSS, DM
    SCHMITT, DP
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1993, 100 (02) : 204 - 232
  • [9] Costa P.T., 1994, PERSONALITY DISORDER
  • [10] Costa PT., 1992, NEO PI R PROFESSIONA