The active straight leg raising test (ASLR) in pregnant women: Differences in muscle activity and force between patients and healthy subjects

被引:64
作者
de Groot, M. [1 ]
Pool-Goudzwaarda, A. L. [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Spoor, C. W. [1 ]
Snijders, C. J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Erasmus Univ, Med Ctr, Dept Biomed Phys & Technol, NL-3000 DR Rotterdam, Netherlands
[2] Med Ctr Impact Zoetermeer, Rotterdam, Netherlands
[3] Ctr Res Musckuloskeletal Syst, Amersfoort, Netherlands
关键词
active straight leg raising test; pregnancy; low back and pelvic pain; sacroiliac joint;
D O I
10.1016/j.math.2006.08.006
中图分类号
R49 [康复医学];
学科分类号
100215 ;
摘要
Pregnancy-related low back and pelvic pain (PLBP) is a frequent complication of pregnancy. Although pathological mechanisms underlying PLBP are obscure, dysfunction of the sacroiliac joints (SI-joints) seems to play an important role. A cross-sectional study was performed on 24 pregnant women with and without PLBP. The objective was to determine muscle activation patterns of trunk and leg muscles during the active straight leg raising test (ASLR) and static hip flexion, and to determine maximal hip flexion force at 0 and 20 cm leg raise height. Moreover, the effort to raise the leg was scored. The measurements resulted in several significant differences between the patients and healthy controls; among others (a) patients scored subjectively more effort during ASLR, (b) at both 0 and 20 cm leg raise height patients had less hip flexion force, and (c) patients developed more muscle activity during ASLR. Since pregnant women with PLBP developed a higher muscle activity during ASLR with a significantly lower output at 0 and 20 cm than healthy pregnant women, it could be proposed that the ASLR demonstrates a disturbed load transfer across the SI-joints in this population. (c) 2006 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:68 / 74
页数:7
相关论文
共 47 条
[1]   Evaluation of clinical tests used in classification procedures in pregnancy-related pelvic joint pain [J].
Albert, H ;
Godskesen, M ;
Westergaard, J .
EUROPEAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2000, 9 (02) :161-166
[2]   Prognosis in four syndromes of pregnancy-related pelvic pain [J].
Albert, H ;
Godskesen, M ;
Westergaard, J .
ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2001, 80 (06) :505-510
[3]  
[Anonymous], ANATOMICAL GUIDE ELE
[4]  
BERG G, 1988, OBSTET GYNECOL, V71, P71
[5]   Sonographic assessment of symphyseal joint distention during pregnancy and post partum with special reference to pelvic pain [J].
Björklund, K ;
Nordström, ML ;
Bergström, S .
ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 1999, 78 (02) :125-130
[6]   A non-invasive technique for assessing innominate bone motion [J].
Bussey, MD ;
Yanai, T ;
Milburn, P .
CLINICAL BIOMECHANICS, 2004, 19 (01) :85-90
[7]  
Chamberlain WE, 1930, AM J ROENTGENOL RADI, V24, P621
[8]   POSITIVE SACROILIAC SCREENING-TESTS IN ASYMPTOMATIC ADULTS [J].
DREYFUSS, P ;
DREYER, S ;
GRIFFIN, J ;
HOFFMAN, J ;
WALSH, N .
SPINE, 1994, 19 (10) :1138-1143
[9]   PELVIC PAIN AND LOW-BACK-PAIN IN PREGNANT-WOMEN - AN EPIDEMIOLOGIC-STUDY [J].
ENDRESEN, EH .
SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF RHEUMATOLOGY, 1995, 24 (03) :135-141
[10]   LOW-BACK-PAIN IN PREGNANCY [J].
FAST, A ;
SHAPIRO, D ;
DUCOMMUN, EJ ;
FRIEDMANN, LW ;
BOUKLAS, T ;
FLOMAN, Y .
SPINE, 1987, 12 (04) :368-371