INFLUENCE OF PROSTATIC EDEMA ON 131Cs PERMANENT PROSTATE SEED IMPLANTS: A DOSIMETRIC AND RADIOBIOLOGICAL STUDY

被引:5
作者
Kehwar, Than S. [1 ]
Jones, Heather A. [1 ]
Huq, M. Saiful [1 ]
Smith, Ryan P. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Pittsburgh, Inst Canc, Dept Radiat Oncol, UPMC Canc Ctr, Pittsburgh, PA 15232 USA
来源
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS | 2011年 / 80卷 / 02期
关键词
Quality indices; Biologically effective dose; Effective treatment time; Prostatic edema; Fractional doses; POSTIMPLANT DOSIMETRY; BRACHYTHERAPY; I-125; RADIOTHERAPY; CARCINOMA; IMPACT; CANCER; VOLUME; MODEL;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.07.001
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: To study the influence of prostatic edema on postimplant physical and radiobiological parameters using Cs-131 permanent prostate seed implants. Methods and Materials: Thirty-one patients with early prostate cancer who underwent Cs-131 permanent seed implantation were evaluated. Dose-volume histograms were generated for each set of prostate volumes obtained at preimplantation and postimplantion days 0, 14, and 28 to compute quality indices (QIs) and fractional doses at level x (FDx). A set of equations for QI, FDx and biologically effective doses at dose level D-x (BEDx) were defined to account for edema changes with time after implant. Results: There were statistically significant differences found between QIs of pre- and postimplant plans at day 0, except for the overdose index (ODI). QIs correlated with postimplant time, and FDx, was found to increase with increasing postimplant time. With the effect of edema, BED at different dose levels showed less improvement due to the short half-life of Cs-131, which delivers about 85% of the prescribed dose before the prostate reaches its original volume due to dissipation of edema. Conclusions: Results of the study show that QIs, FDx, and BEDs at the level of D-x changed from preneedle plans to postimplant plans and have statistically significant differences (p <0.05), except for the ODI (p = 0.106), which suggests that at the time of C-131 seed implantation, the effect of edema must be accounted for when defining the seed positions, to avoid the possibility of poor dosimetric and radiobiologic results for Cs-131 seed implants. (C) 2011 Elsevier Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:621 / 627
页数:7
相关论文
共 32 条
[12]   CESIUM-131 SEEDS FOR PERMANENT IMPLANTS [J].
HENSCHKE, UK ;
LAWRENCE, DC .
RADIOLOGY, 1965, 85 (06) :1117-&
[13]  
Kehwar Than S, 2008, Int J Med Sci, V5, P41
[14]   Effect of edema associated with 131Cs prostate permanent seed implants on dosimetric quality indices [J].
Kehwar, Than S. ;
Jones, Heather A. ;
Huq, M. Saiful ;
Beriwal, Sushil ;
Benoit, Ronald M. ;
Smith, Ryan P. .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2009, 36 (08) :3536-3542
[15]   The 1999 Patterns of Care Study of Radiotherapy in localized prostate carcinoma - A comprehensive survey of prostate brachytherapy in the United States [J].
Lee, WR ;
Moughan, J ;
Owen, JB ;
Zelefsky, MJ .
CANCER, 2003, 98 (09) :1987-1994
[16]   Equivalent uniform dose, D90, and V100 correlation with biochemical control after low-dose-rate prostate brachytherapy for clinically low-risk prostate cancer [J].
Miles, Edward F. ;
Nelson, John W. ;
Alkaissi, Ali K. ;
Das, Shiva ;
Clough, Robert W. ;
Anscher, Mitchell S. ;
Oleson, James R. .
BRACHYTHERAPY, 2008, 7 (02) :206-211
[17]   Evaluation of the new cesium-131 seed for use in low-energy x-ray brachytherapy [J].
Murphy, MK ;
Piper, RK ;
Greenwood, LR ;
Mitch, MG ;
Lamperti, PJ ;
Seltzer, SM ;
Bales, MJ ;
Phillips, MH .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 2004, 31 (06) :1529-1538
[18]   I-125 IMPLANTS FOR CARCINOMA OF THE PROSTATE [J].
PESCHEL, RE ;
FOGEL, TD ;
KACINSKI, BM ;
KELLY, K ;
MATE, TP .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 1985, 11 (10) :1777-1781
[19]   Comparison of dosimetric and biologic effective dose parameters for prostate and urethra using 131CS and 125I for prostate permanent implant brachytherapy [J].
Sahgal, Arjun ;
Jabbari, Siavash ;
Chen, Josephine ;
Pickett, Barbie ;
Roach, Mack, III ;
Weinberg, Vivian ;
Hsu, I-Chow ;
Pouliot, Jean .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2008, 72 (01) :247-254
[20]   REFERENCE DOSE-RATES FOR SINGLE-PLANE AND DOUBLE-PLANE IR-192 IMPLANTS [J].
SAW, CB ;
SUNTHARALINGAM, N .
MEDICAL PHYSICS, 1988, 15 (03) :391-396