Surgical options for proximal and distal transverse arch hypoplasia in infants with coarctation

Background: Although various surgical techniques have been reported for aortic arch reconstruction for proximal and distal transverse arch (PDTA) hypoplasia, no consensus has been reached on a surgical option for initial arch reconstruction. This study was undertaken to review various arch reconstruction options for PDTA hypoplasia in Chinese infants. Methods: A retrospective review of 121 infants who underwent initial arch reconstruction of the proximal and distal aortic arches between 2010 and 2020 was performed. Freedom from recoarctation was analyzed using Kaplan-Meier analysis. Univariate and multivariable Cox regression analyses were performed to determine perioperative data associated with an increased risk of recoarctation after surgery. Results: Aortic arch reconstruction was performed by end-to-side anastomosis (ESA) (n=37) or patch repair [autologous pericardial patch (APP), n=53; bovine pericardial patch (BPP), n=20; autologous pulmonary artery patch (APAP), n=11]. The relative diameter of the proximal arch was 0.51 +/- 0.07, and the relative diameter of the distal arch was 0.43 +/- 0.07. The median follow-up time was 679 (range, 388-1,362) days. Recoarctation was observed in 44 (36.4%) patients. ESA was an independent risk factor for further development of recoarctation after the initial aortic arch reconstruction [hazard ratio (HR) =2.13; P=0.020]. Conclusions: Aortic arch reconstruction via ESA was an independent risk factor for late recoarctation of the proximal and distal aortic arches in patients who underwent the initial surgery in infancy.