Three-dimensional displacement field of the 2010 Mw 8.8 Maule earthquake from GPS and InSAR data with the improved ESISTEM-VCE method

被引:4
作者
Xiong, Luyun [1 ]
Xu, Caijun [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Liu, Yang [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Zhao, Yingwen [1 ]
Geng, Jianghui [4 ,5 ]
Ortega-Culaciati, Francisco [6 ]
机构
[1] Wuhan Univ, Sch Geodesy & Geomat, Wuhan, Hubei, Peoples R China
[2] Wuhan Univ, Key Lab Geospace Environm & Geodesy, Minist Educ, Wuhan, Hubei, Peoples R China
[3] Minist Nat Resources, Key Lab Geophys Geodesy, Wuhan, Hubei, Peoples R China
[4] Wuhan Univ, GNSS Res Ctr, Wuhan, Hubei, Peoples R China
[5] Hubei Luojia Lab, Wuhan, Hubei, Peoples R China
[6] Univ Chile, Fac Phys & Math Sci, Dept Geophys, Santiago, Chile
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
The 2010 Mw 8.8 Maule earthquake; three-dimensional displacement field; ESISTEM-VCE method; GPS; InSAR; CRUSTAL DEFORMATION; SLIP DISTRIBUTION; COSEISMIC SLIP; CENTRAL CHILE; SEISMIC GAP; FAULT SLIP; OPTIMIZATION; INVERSION;
D O I
10.3389/feart.2022.970493
中图分类号
P [天文学、地球科学];
学科分类号
07 ;
摘要
The 2010 Mw 8.8 Maule earthquake occurred offshore central Chile and ruptured similar to 500 km along the megathrust fault resulting from the oceanic Nazca plate subducting beneath the continental South American plate. The Maule earthquake produced remnant crustal displacements captured by a vast set of geodetic observations. However, given the nature of the observational techniques, it is challenging to extract its accurate three-dimensional coseismic deformation field with high spatial resolution. In this study, we modified the extended simultaneous and integrated strain tensor estimation from geodetic and satellite deformation measurements (ESISTEM) method with variance component estimation algorithm (ESISTEM-VCE) to retrieve the three-dimensional surface displacement field of this event by integrating the interferometric synthetic aperture radar (InSAR) and global positioning system (GPS) measurements. The ESISTEM-VCE method accounts for the spatial correlation of surface displacement among the adjacent points and determine the accurate weight ratios for different data sets, but also uses the uncertainties of GPS data and considers the different spatial scales from the different datasets. In the simulation experiments, the RMSEs of the ESISTEM-VCE method are smaller than those of the ESISTEM and ESISTEM-VCE (same d0) methods, and the improvements of 97.1%, 3.9%, and 84% are achieved in the east-west, north-south, and vertical components, respectively. Then, we apply the proposed methodology to the 2010 Mw 8.8 Maule earthquake, to obtain a three-dimensional displacement field that could provide fine deformation information. In the east-west component, the significant deformation is in the north of the epicenter, closed to the Constitucion, with a maximum westward displacement of 495.5 cm. The displacement in the north-south component is relatively small compared to that in the east-west component. The maximum uplift reaches 211.8 cm, located at the southwest of the Concepcion. Finally, the derived vertical displacements are also compared with field investigations, indicating that the ESISTEM-VCE method more accurate weight of different datasets and perform better than the ESISTEM method. The results highlight that the earthquake ruptured along the NE-SW direction, with a dominant thrust and a relatively small component of right-lateral strike-slip, coinciding with the characteristics of subduction and right-lateral shear. The experiments with the simulated and real data suggest that the improved ESISTEM-VCE method in this study is feasible and effective.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 61 条
[1]  
Bevis M, 2001, GEOCHEM GEOPHY GEOSY, V2
[2]  
Cui X.Z., 2001, GEN SURVEYING ADJUST, P102
[3]  
Dach R., 2007, BERNESE GPS SOFTWARE
[4]   Slip distribution of the February 27, 2010 Mw=8.8 Maule Earthquake, central Chile, from static and high-rate GPS, InSAR, and broadband teleseismic data [J].
Delouis, Bertrand ;
Nocquet, Jean-Mathieu ;
Vallee, Martin .
GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2010, 37
[5]   Himalayan megathrust geometry and relation to topography revealed by the Gorkha earthquake [J].
Elliott, J. R. ;
Jolivet, R. ;
Gonzalez, P. J. ;
Avouac, J. -P. ;
Hollingsworth, J. ;
Searle, M. P. ;
Stevens, V. L. .
NATURE GEOSCIENCE, 2016, 9 (02) :174-+
[6]   Land-Level Changes Produced by the Mw 8.8 2010 Chilean Earthquake [J].
Farias, Marcelo ;
Vargas, Gabriel ;
Tassara, Andres ;
Carretier, Sebastien ;
Baize, Stephane ;
Melnick, Daniel ;
Bataille, Klaus .
SCIENCE, 2010, 329 (5994) :916-916
[7]   The complete (3-D) surface displacement field in the epicentral area of the 1999 Mw7.1 Hector Mine earthquake, California, from space geodetic observations [J].
Fialko, Y ;
Simons, M ;
Agnew, D .
GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2001, 28 (16) :3063-3066
[8]   Field Survey of the 27 February 2010 Chile Tsunami [J].
Fritz, Hermann M. ;
Petroff, Catherine M. ;
Catalan, Patricio A. ;
Cienfuegos, Rodrigo ;
Winckler, Patricio ;
Kalligeris, Nikos ;
Weiss, Robert ;
Barrientos, Sergio E. ;
Meneses, Gianina ;
Valderas-Bermejo, Carolina ;
Ebeling, Carl ;
Papadopoulos, Athanassios ;
Contreras, Manuel ;
Almar, Rafael ;
Carlos Dominguez, Juan ;
Synolakis, Costas E. .
PURE AND APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 2011, 168 (11) :1989-2010
[9]   Slip Distribution and Seismic Moment of the 2010 and 1960 Chilean Earthquakes Inferred from Tsunami Waveforms and Coastal Geodetic Data [J].
Fujii, Yushiro ;
Satake, Kenji .
PURE AND APPLIED GEOPHYSICS, 2013, 170 (9-10) :1493-1509
[10]   Three-dimensional displacement field of the 2015 Mw8.3 Illapel earthquake (Chile) from across- and along-track Sentinel-1 TOPS interferometry [J].
Grandin, R. ;
Klein, E. ;
Metois, M. ;
Vigny, C. .
GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2016, 43 (06) :2552-2561