A new questionnaire to identify bodily distress in primary care: The 'BDS checklist'

被引:88
作者
Budtz-Lilly, Anna [1 ]
Fink, Per [2 ]
Ornbol, Eva [2 ]
Vestergaard, Mogens [1 ]
Moth, Grete [1 ]
Christensen, Kaj Sparle [1 ]
Rosendal, Marianne [1 ]
机构
[1] Aarhus Univ, Res Unit Gen Practice, Dept Publ Hlth, DK-8000 Aarhus C, Denmark
[2] Aarhus Univ Hosp, Res Clin Funct Disorders & Psychosomat, Aarhus, Denmark
关键词
Bodily distress; Diagnosis; Functional somatic symptoms; Primary care; Factor analyses; FUNCTIONAL SOMATIC SYNDROMES; LATENT CLASS ANALYSIS; SYMPTOMS; MANAGEMENT; DIAGNOSIS; TIME;
D O I
10.1016/j.jpsychores.2015.03.006
中图分类号
R749 [精神病学];
学科分类号
100205 ;
摘要
Background: Functional symptoms and disorders are common in primary care. Bodily distress syndrome (BDS) is a newly proposed clinical diagnosis for functional disorders. The BDS diagnosis is based on empirical research, and the symptoms stated in the BDS criteria have been translated into a self-report questionnaire called the BDS checklist. The aim of the present study was to investigate the psychometric properties of the checklist and to test the construct of BDS. Method: The 30-item BDS checklist was completed by 2480 adult primary care patients in a cross-sectional study on contact and disease patterns in Danish general practice. We performed (internal) validation analyses of the collected checklist data. We also performed factor and latent class analyses to identify both BDS symptom groups and BDS patient groups. Results: Internal validation analyses revealed acceptable and usable psychometric properties of the BDS checklist. The factor analyses identified the four distinct determining factors for BDS: cardiopulmonary, gastrointestinal, musculoskeletal and general symptoms. Results from factor and multi-trait analyses suggested a shortening of the BDS checklist (from 30 to 25 items). The latent class analyses resulted in three severity levels (no, moderate and severe BDS); the best fit index was found for a threshold of >= 4 symptoms in a symptom group. Conclusion: The results provide empirical support for the previously described construct of BDS with four symptom groups and three patient groups. The BDS checklist is a self-report instrument that may be used for case finding in both clinical practice and in research. (C) 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:536 / 545
页数:10
相关论文
共 40 条
  • [1] APA, 2013, DIAGN STAT MAN MENT
  • [2] Somatoform disorder in primary care: Course and the need for cognitive-behavioral treatment
    Arnold, Ingrid A.
    de Waal, Margot W. M.
    Eekhof, Just A. H.
    van Hemert, Albert M.
    [J]. PSYCHOSOMATICS, 2006, 47 (06) : 498 - 503
  • [3] Cronbach's alpha
    Bland, JM
    Altman, DG
    [J]. BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1997, 314 (7080) : 572 - 572
  • [4] Is there a better term than "Medically unexplained symptoms"?
    Creed, Francis
    Guthrie, Elspeth
    Fink, Per
    Henningsen, Peter
    Rief, Winfried
    Sharpe, Michael
    White, Peter
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PSYCHOSOMATIC RESEARCH, 2010, 68 (01) : 5 - 8
  • [5] Cronbach LJ, 1951, PSYCHOMETRIKA, V16, P167
  • [6] HOPKINS SYMPTOM CHECKLIST (HSCL) - SELF-REPORT SYMPTOM INVENTORY
    DEROGATIS, LR
    LIPMAN, RS
    RICKELS, K
    UHLENHUTH, EH
    COVI, L
    [J]. BEHAVIORAL SCIENCE, 1974, 19 (01): : 1 - 15
  • [7] Fayers P.M., 2013, QUALITY LIFE ASSESSM
  • [8] Recent developments in the understanding and management of functional somatic symptoms in primary care
    Fink, Per
    Rosendal, Marianne
    [J]. CURRENT OPINION IN PSYCHIATRY, 2008, 21 (02) : 182 - 188
  • [9] Symptoms and syndromes of bodily distress: An exploratory study of 978 internal medical, neurological, and primary care patients
    Fink, Per
    Toft, Tomas
    Hansen, Morten Steen
    Ornbol, Eva
    Olesen, Frede
    [J]. PSYCHOSOMATIC MEDICINE, 2007, 69 (01): : 30 - 39
  • [10] One single diagnosis, bodily distress syndrome, succeeded to capture 10 diagnostic categories of functional somatic syndromes and somatoform disorders
    Fink, Per
    Schroder, Andreas
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PSYCHOSOMATIC RESEARCH, 2010, 68 (05) : 415 - 426