Context effects in coercion: Evidence from eye movements

被引:49
作者
Traxler, MJ
McElree, B
Williams, RS
Pickering, MJ
机构
[1] Univ Calif Davis, Dept Psychol, Davis, CA 95616 USA
[2] NYU, New York, NY 10003 USA
[3] Florida State Univ, Tallahassee, FL 32306 USA
[4] Univ Edinburgh, Edinburgh EH8 9LW, Midlothian, Scotland
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
semantics; coercion; enriched composition; sentence processing;
D O I
10.1016/j.jml.2005.02.002
中图分类号
H0 [语言学];
学科分类号
030303 ; 0501 ; 050102 ;
摘要
Four eye-movement monitoring studies examined the processing of expressions argued to require enriched semantic composition (Pustejovsky, 1995). Previous research found that noun phrases denoting entities (e.g., the book) were difficult to process following verbs that require event complements (e.g., begin). Expressions like began the book may be difficult to process because they require complex operations to construct an event sense (e.g., began writing the book), they engender competition between alternative interpretations (cf. began reading the book), or they require a costly retrieval operation to recover a suitable activity (e.g., reading). Introducing the activity before a target expression did not eliminate the processing cost (Experiments 1 and 2), but introducing the entire event sense did (Experiments 3 and 4). These findings are incompatible with accounts that would attribute the observed cost to the retrieval or selection of an implicit activity in the event sense of the expression. They suggest that interpretation is costly when composition requires the online construction of a sense not lexically stored or available in the immediate discourse. (c) 2005 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1 / 25
页数:25
相关论文
共 42 条
[1]  
Almor A., 2000, Architectures and Mechanisms for Language Processing, P341, DOI 10.3758/bf03209354
[2]   INTERACTION WITH CONTEXT DURING HUMAN SENTENCE PROCESSING [J].
ALTMANN, G ;
STEEDMAN, M .
COGNITION, 1988, 30 (03) :191-238
[3]   AVOIDING THE GARDEN PATH - EYE-MOVEMENTS IN CONTEXT [J].
ALTMANN, GTM ;
GARNHAM, A ;
DENNIS, Y .
JOURNAL OF MEMORY AND LANGUAGE, 1992, 31 (05) :685-712
[4]  
[Anonymous], LEXICAL REPRESENTATI
[5]   EYE-MOVEMENTS AND LEXICAL AMBIGUITY RESOLUTION - EFFECTS OF PRIOR ENCOUNTER AND DISCOURSE TOPIC [J].
BINDER, KS ;
MORRIS, RK .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-LEARNING MEMORY AND COGNITION, 1995, 21 (05) :1186-1196
[6]  
BRISCOE E, 1990, P 13 INT C COMP LING, P42
[7]   Modifier attachment in sentence parsing: Evidence from Dutch [J].
Brysbaert, M ;
Mitchell, DC .
QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY SECTION A-HUMAN EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1996, 49 (03) :664-695
[8]  
Clark Herbert H., 1977, Discourse production and comprehension, P1
[9]   THEMATIC ROLES IN SENTENCE PARSING [J].
CLIFTON, C .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-REVUE CANADIENNE DE PSYCHOLOGIE EXPERIMENTALE, 1993, 47 (02) :222-246
[10]  
DUFFY SA, 1988, COGNITIVE PSYCHOL, V17, P364