Challenges Hindering Widespread Adoption of Minimally Invasive Spinal Surgery

被引:4
|
作者
Goldberg, Jacob L. [1 ]
Hartl, Roger [1 ]
Elowitz, Eric [1 ]
机构
[1] Weill Cornell Med, NewYork Presbyterian Hosp, Dept Neurol Surg, New York, NY 10021 USA
关键词
Acceptance; Challenges; Cost; Minimally invasive spinal surgery; Training; LUMBAR INTERBODY FUSION; SCREW PLACEMENT; PEDICLE SCREWS; THORACIC SPINE; FLUOROSCOPY; NAVIGATION; COMPLICATIONS; ACCURACY; METAANALYSIS; MINIMUM;
D O I
10.1016/j.wneu.2022.03.129
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Minimally invasive spinal surgery (MISS) techniques offer several beneficial prospects and are being increasingly requested by patients. However, these techniques have not been uniformly adopted by spinal surgeons, and they remain controversial among some. Several barriers have prevented widespread adoption of MISS. These include concerns regarding high start-up costs, limited evidence base, and lack of surgeon training. In addition, the unique approaches involved in MISS expose spinal surgeons to unfamiliar anatomy. Further, while MISS can address a growing spectrum of spinal pathology, some conditions, as well as complications encountered during MISS procedures, require open surgery. This requires surgeons to not only acquire the new and specialized MISS skillset but also maintain their ability to perform open surgery. These factors present challenges common to developing and innovative surgical techniques. Here, we review the barriers preventing wider adoption of MISS and present a framework to promote the safe and effective growth of MISS.
引用
收藏
页码:228 / 232
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Advances and Challenges in Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery
    Wang, Timothy Y.
    Wang, Michael Y.
    JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MEDICINE, 2024, 13 (11)
  • [2] The Future of Minimally Invasive Spinal Surgery
    Goldberg, Jacob L.
    Hussain, Ibrahim
    Sommer, Fabian
    Haertl, Roger
    Elowitz, Eric
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2022, 163 : 233 - 240
  • [3] Is minimally invasive surgery a game changer in spinal surgery?
    Park, Sang-Min
    Kim, Ho-Joong
    Yeom, Jin S.
    ASIAN SPINE JOURNAL, 2024,
  • [4] Evolving Navigation, Robotics, and Augmented Reality in Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery
    Hussain, Ibrahim
    Cosar, Murat
    Kirnaz, Sertac
    Schmidt, Franziska A.
    Wipplinger, Christoph
    Wong, Taylor
    Hartl, Roger
    GLOBAL SPINE JOURNAL, 2020, 10 : 22S - 33S
  • [5] Minimally Invasive Surgery for Spinal Metastasis: A Review
    Flynn, Scott C.
    Eli, Ilyas M.
    Ghogawala, Zoher
    Yew, Andrew Y.
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2022, 159 : E32 - E39
  • [6] Surgical and Clinical Results of Minimally Invasive Spinal Fusion Surgery in an Unselected Patient Cohort of a Spinal Care Unit
    Senker, Wolfgang
    Gruber, Andreas
    Gmeiner, Matthias
    Stefanits, Harald
    Sander, Kirsten
    Roessler, Philipp
    Pflugmacher, Robert
    ORTHOPAEDIC SURGERY, 2018, 10 (03) : 192 - 197
  • [7] Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery: An Overview
    Goldberg, Jacob L.
    Hartl, Roger
    Elowitz, Eric
    WORLD NEUROSURGERY, 2022, 163 : 214 - 227
  • [8] Robotic Spine Surgery: Current State in Minimally Invasive Surgery
    Vo, Chau D.
    Jiang, Bowen
    Azad, Tej D.
    Crawford, Neil R.
    Bydon, Ali
    Theodore, Nicholas
    GLOBAL SPINE JOURNAL, 2020, 10 : 34S - 40S
  • [9] Minimally Invasive Spinal Surgery in the Elderly: Does It Make Sense?
    Shamji, Mohammed F.
    Goldstein, Christina L.
    Wang, Michael
    Uribe, Juan S.
    Fehlings, Michael G.
    NEUROSURGERY, 2015, 77 : S108 - S115
  • [10] Limitations and complications of minimally invasive spinal surgery in adult deformity
    Januszewski, Jacob
    Vivas, Andrew C.
    Uribe, Juan S.
    ANNALS OF TRANSLATIONAL MEDICINE, 2018, 6 (06)