Evaluation of high-resolution satellite products for streamflow and water quality assessment in a Southeastern US watershed

被引:23
作者
Alnahit, Ali O. [1 ]
Mishra, Ashok K. [1 ]
Khan, Abdul A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Clemson Univ, Glenn Dept Civil Engn, Clemson, SC 29634 USA
关键词
Precipitation; SWAT; Uncertainty; Streamflow; Water quality; SPATIAL RAINFALL VARIABILITY; PRECIPITATION ANALYSIS TMPA; RIVER-BASIN; SWAT MODEL; UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS; CATCHMENT; RUNOFF; CALIBRATION; PERFORMANCE; IMPACT;
D O I
10.1016/j.ejrh.2019.100660
中图分类号
TV21 [水资源调查与水利规划];
学科分类号
081501 ;
摘要
Study region: Seneca River Basin South Carolina, USA. Study focus: This study focuses on evaluating different precipitation products on streamflow and water quality modeling. We used 13 years (2001-2014) of daily data from multiple precipitation products. The precipitation products are classified into three categories: (1) products based on observed precipitation data (rain gauges located within the study area and PRISM data), (2) five satellite-based precipitation products (3B42, 3B42RT, PERSIANN-CDR, PERSIANN, and GPCP-1DD); and (3) one Reanalysis product (CFSR). The Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) was calibrated and validated using these precipitation products against monthly observed streamflow, total nitrogen (TN) loads, and total phosphorus (TP) loads within the Seneca River Basin situated in northwest of South Carolina, USA. For each precipitation product, the best performing model parameters was determined using the Sequential Uncertainty Fitting Procedure (SUFP2). New hydrological insights for the region: Results showed that the spatio-temporal pattern of precipitation products varies and further influenced the streamflow and water quality simulations. Most of the precipitation products achieved at least satisfactory performance (R-2 > 0.50, NS > 0.50, and PBIAS >= +/- 15) for streamflow and water quality. PRISM product showed the best overall performance, followed by 3B42 and PERSIANN-CDR, whereas CFSR and PERSIANN products comparatively performed poorly for streamflow and water quality simulations. The uncertainty in the precipitation products was reflected in the streamflow that further affected the water quality simulations (TN and TP loads). In addition, this study showed that the parameter uncertainty significantly varies among precipitation products, leading to a considerable uncertainty in simulation results, especially for TN and TP. Our results suggest that using multiple precipitation products can increase the level of confidence in hydrologic model simulation, particularly in water quality modeling.
引用
收藏
页数:18
相关论文
共 76 条
[51]   Compared performances of different algorithms for estimating annual nutrient loads discharged by the eutrophic River Loire [J].
Moatar, F ;
Meybeck, M .
HYDROLOGICAL PROCESSES, 2005, 19 (02) :429-444
[52]   Comparison of PERSIANN and V7 TRMM Multi-satellite Precipitation Analysis (TMPA) products with rain gauge data over Iran [J].
Moazami, Saber ;
Golian, Saeed ;
Kavianpour, M. Reza ;
Hong, Yang .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF REMOTE SENSING, 2013, 34 (22) :8156-8171
[53]   Delineation of management zones using mobile measurements of soil apparent electrical conductivity and multivariate geostatistical techniques [J].
Moral, F. J. ;
Terron, J. M. ;
Marques da Silva, J. R. .
SOIL & TILLAGE RESEARCH, 2010, 106 (02) :335-343
[54]  
Moriasi DN, 2015, T ASABE, V58, P1763
[55]   Evaluation of TRMM 3B42 precipitation estimates and WRF retrospective precipitation simulation over the Pacific-Andean region of Ecuador and Peru [J].
Ochoa, A. ;
Pineda, L. ;
Crespo, P. ;
Willems, P. .
HYDROLOGY AND EARTH SYSTEM SCIENCES, 2014, 18 (08) :3179-3193
[56]   Comparison of radar and gauge precipitation data in watershed models across varying spatial and temporal scales [J].
Price, Katie ;
Purucker, S. Thomas ;
Kraemer, Stephen R. ;
Babendreier, Justin E. ;
Knightes, Chris D. .
HYDROLOGICAL PROCESSES, 2014, 28 (09) :3505-3520
[57]   PRISM vs. CFSR Precipitation Data Effects on Calibration and Validation of SWAT Models [J].
Radcliffe, D. E. ;
Mukundan, R. .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN WATER RESOURCES ASSOCIATION, 2017, 53 (01) :89-100
[58]   Evaluation of High-Resolution Multisatellite and Reanalysis Rainfall Products over East Africa [J].
Sahlu, Dejene ;
Moges, Semu A. ;
Nikolopoulos, Efthymios I. ;
Anagnostou, Emmanouil N. ;
Hailu, Dereje .
ADVANCES IN METEOROLOGY, 2017, 2017
[59]   GPCC's new land surface precipitation climatology based on quality-controlled in situ data and its role in quantifying the global water cycle [J].
Schneider, Udo ;
Becker, Andreas ;
Finger, Peter ;
Meyer-Christoffer, Anja ;
Ziese, Markus ;
Rudolf, Bruno .
THEORETICAL AND APPLIED CLIMATOLOGY, 2014, 115 (1-2) :15-40
[60]   Impact of spatial rainfall variability on hydrology and nonpoint source pollution modeling [J].
Shen Zhenyao ;
Chen Lei ;
Liao Qian ;
Liu Ruimin ;
Hong Qian .
JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2012, 472 :205-215