Exploration of Teammate Trust and Interaction Dynamics in Human-Autonomy Teaming

被引:28
|
作者
Demir, Mustafa [1 ]
McNeese, Nathan J. [2 ]
Gorman, Jaime C. [3 ]
Cooke, Nancy J. [1 ]
Myers, Christopher W. [4 ]
Grimm, David A. [5 ]
机构
[1] Arizona State Univ, Human Syst Engn, Ira A Fulton Sch Engn, Tempe, AZ 85281 USA
[2] Clemson Univ, Human Ctr Comp, Clemson, SC 29634 USA
[3] Georgia Inst Technol, Ind Psychol, Atlanta, GA 30332 USA
[4] Agents Branch, Cognit Sci, Models, Dayton, OH 45433 USA
[5] Georgia Inst Technol, Engn Psychol, Atlanta, GA 30332 USA
关键词
Automation; Task analysis; Navigation; Autonomous agents; Training; Particle measurements; Monitoring; Artificial intelligence; dynamical systems; team coordination; trust; unmanned air vehicle systems; RECURRENCE PLOTS; AUTOMATION; PERFORMANCE; METAANALYSIS;
D O I
10.1109/THMS.2021.3115058
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
This article considers human-autonomy teams (HATs) in which two human team members interact and collaborate with an autonomous teammate to achieve a common task while dealing with unexpected technological failures that were imposed either in automation or autonomy. A Wizard of Oz methodology is used to simulate the autonomous teammate. One of the critical aspects of HAT performance is the trust that develops over time as team members interact with each other in a dynamic task environment. For this reason, it is important to examine the dynamic nature of teammate trust through real-time measures of team interactions. This article examines team interaction and trust to understand better how they change under automation and autonomy failures. Thus, we address two research questions: 1) How does trust in HATs evolve over time?; and 2) How is the relationship between team interaction and trust impacted by the failures? We hypothesize that trust in HATs will decrease as autonomy failures increase. We also hypothesize that team interaction would be related to the development of trust and recovery from the failures. The results implicate three general trends: 1) team interaction dynamics are linked to the development of trust in HATs; 2) trust in the autonomous teammate is only associated with recovery from autonomy failures; 3) team interaction dynamics are related to both automation and autonomy failure recovery.
引用
收藏
页码:696 / 705
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Enabling Digital Air Traffic Controller Assistant through Human-Autonomy Teaming Design
    Jameel, Mohsan
    Tyburzy, Lukas
    Gerdes, Ingrid
    Pick, Andreas
    Hunger, Robert
    Christoffels, Lothar
    2023 IEEE/AIAA 42ND DIGITAL AVIONICS SYSTEMS CONFERENCE, DASC, 2023,
  • [32] Measuring Perceived Agent Appropriateness in a Live-Flight Human-Autonomy Teaming Scenario
    Lyons, Joseph
    Highland, Patrick
    Bos, Nathan
    Lyons, David
    Skinner, Anna
    Schnell, Thomas
    Hefron, Ryan
    ERGONOMICS IN DESIGN, 2024, 32 (04) : 12 - 17
  • [33] Operationally Realistic Human-Autonomy Teaming Task Simulation to Study Multi-Dimensional Trust
    Sung, Jaekeun
    Leary, Sarah
    Hurd, Victoria S.
    Lee, Christian
    Qin, Yimin
    Kong, Zhaodan
    Clark, Torin K.
    Anderson, Allison
    COMPANION OF THE 2024 ACM/IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON HUMAN-ROBOT INTERACTION, HRI 2024 COMPANION, 2024, : 1028 - 1032
  • [34] Testing Human-Autonomy Teaming Concepts on a Global Positioning System Interface
    Russell, Ricky
    HUMAN INTERFACE AND THE MANAGEMENT OF INFORMATION: INFORMATION IN APPLICATIONS AND SERVICES, HIMI 2018 HELD AS PART OF HCII 2018, PART II, 2018, 10905 : 450 - 464
  • [35] Training and Verbal Communications in Human-Autonomy Teaming Under Degraded Conditions
    Johnson, Craig J.
    Demir, Mustafa
    Zabala, Garrett M.
    He, Hongbei
    Grimm, David A.
    Radigan, Cody
    Wolff, Alexandra T.
    Cooke, Nancy J.
    McNeese, Nathan J.
    Gorman, Jamie C.
    2020 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COGNITIVE AND COMPUTATIONAL ASPECTS OF SITUATION MANAGEMENT (IEEE COGSIMA), 2020, : 53 - 58
  • [36] Designing High-Impact Experiments for Human-Autonomy / AI Teaming
    Flathmann, Christopher
    Mcneese, Nathan J.
    O'Neill, Thomas A.
    JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE ENGINEERING AND DECISION MAKING, 2025,
  • [37] Human-Autonomy Teaming and Explainable AI Capabilities in RTS Games
    Lucero, Crisrael
    Izumigawa, Christianne
    Frederiksen, Kurt
    Nans, Lena
    Iden, Rebecca
    Lange, Douglas S.
    ENGINEERING PSYCHOLOGY AND COGNITIVE ERGONOMICS. COGNITION AND DESIGN, EPCE 2020, PT II, 2020, 12187 : 161 - 171
  • [38] EEG-Based Neural Correlates of Trust in Human-Autonomy Interaction
    Wang, Min
    Hussein, Aya
    Rojas, Raul Fernandez
    Shafi, Kamran
    Abbass, Hussein A.
    2018 IEEE SYMPOSIUM SERIES ON COMPUTATIONAL INTELLIGENCE (IEEE SSCI), 2018, : 350 - 357
  • [39] Application of Human-Autonomy Teaming to an Advanced Ground Station for Reduced Crew Operations
    Ho, Nhut
    Johnson, Walter
    Panesar, Karanvir
    Wakeland, Kenny
    Sadler, Garrett
    Wilson, Nathan
    Bao Nguyen
    Lachter, Joel
    Brandt, Summer
    2017 IEEE/AIAA 36TH DIGITAL AVIONICS SYSTEMS CONFERENCE (DASC), 2017,
  • [40] A Computational Framework for Optimal Adaptive Function Allocation in a Human-Autonomy Teaming Scenario
    Byeon, Sooyung
    Choi, Joonwon
    Hwang, Inseok
    IEEE OPEN JOURNAL OF CONTROL SYSTEMS, 2024, 3 : 32 - 44