Exploration of Teammate Trust and Interaction Dynamics in Human-Autonomy Teaming

被引:28
|
作者
Demir, Mustafa [1 ]
McNeese, Nathan J. [2 ]
Gorman, Jaime C. [3 ]
Cooke, Nancy J. [1 ]
Myers, Christopher W. [4 ]
Grimm, David A. [5 ]
机构
[1] Arizona State Univ, Human Syst Engn, Ira A Fulton Sch Engn, Tempe, AZ 85281 USA
[2] Clemson Univ, Human Ctr Comp, Clemson, SC 29634 USA
[3] Georgia Inst Technol, Ind Psychol, Atlanta, GA 30332 USA
[4] Agents Branch, Cognit Sci, Models, Dayton, OH 45433 USA
[5] Georgia Inst Technol, Engn Psychol, Atlanta, GA 30332 USA
关键词
Automation; Task analysis; Navigation; Autonomous agents; Training; Particle measurements; Monitoring; Artificial intelligence; dynamical systems; team coordination; trust; unmanned air vehicle systems; RECURRENCE PLOTS; AUTOMATION; PERFORMANCE; METAANALYSIS;
D O I
10.1109/THMS.2021.3115058
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
This article considers human-autonomy teams (HATs) in which two human team members interact and collaborate with an autonomous teammate to achieve a common task while dealing with unexpected technological failures that were imposed either in automation or autonomy. A Wizard of Oz methodology is used to simulate the autonomous teammate. One of the critical aspects of HAT performance is the trust that develops over time as team members interact with each other in a dynamic task environment. For this reason, it is important to examine the dynamic nature of teammate trust through real-time measures of team interactions. This article examines team interaction and trust to understand better how they change under automation and autonomy failures. Thus, we address two research questions: 1) How does trust in HATs evolve over time?; and 2) How is the relationship between team interaction and trust impacted by the failures? We hypothesize that trust in HATs will decrease as autonomy failures increase. We also hypothesize that team interaction would be related to the development of trust and recovery from the failures. The results implicate three general trends: 1) team interaction dynamics are linked to the development of trust in HATs; 2) trust in the autonomous teammate is only associated with recovery from autonomy failures; 3) team interaction dynamics are related to both automation and autonomy failure recovery.
引用
收藏
页码:696 / 705
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [21] Human-Autonomy Teaming for Critical Command and Control Functions
    Irandoust, Hengameh
    Benaskeur, Abder
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2020 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON HUMAN-MACHINE SYSTEMS (ICHMS), 2020, : 512 - 517
  • [22] Stepping out of the shadow of human-human teaming: Crafting a unique identity for human-autonomy teams
    McNeese, Nathan J.
    Flathmann, Christopher
    O'Neill, Thomas A.
    Salas, Eduardo
    COMPUTERS IN HUMAN BEHAVIOR, 2023, 148
  • [23] Are Teammate Trust and Confidence Dissociable in Risk Intensive Human Machine Teaming?
    Blitch, John G.
    Skinner, Anna D.
    HUMAN SYSTEMS ENGINEERING AND DESIGN, IHSED2018, 2019, 876 : 699 - 704
  • [24] A Design Pattern for Working Agreements in Human-Autonomy Teaming
    Gutzwiller, Robert S.
    Espinosa, Sarah H.
    Kenny, Caitlin
    Lange, Douglas S.
    ADVANCES IN HUMAN FACTORS IN SIMULATION AND MODELING (AHFE 2017), 2018, 591 : 12 - 24
  • [25] Affective Responses to Trust Violations in a Human-Autonomy Teaming Context: Humans Versus Robots
    Gene M. Alarcon
    Joseph B. Lyons
    Izz aldin Hamdan
    Sarah A. Jessup
    International Journal of Social Robotics, 2024, 16 : 23 - 35
  • [26] Towards Neuro-Symbolic Reinforcement Learning For Trustworthy Human-Autonomy Teaming
    Gurung, Priti
    Li, Jiang
    Rawat, Danda B.
    ASSURANCE AND SECURITY FOR AI-ENABLED SYSTEMS, 2024, 13054
  • [27] Team situation awareness within the context of human-autonomy teaming
    Demir, Mustafa
    McNeese, Nathan J.
    Cooke, Nancy J.
    COGNITIVE SYSTEMS RESEARCH, 2017, 46 : 3 - 12
  • [28] Effective Team Interaction for Adaptive Training and Situation Awareness in Human-Autonomy Teaming
    Demir, Mustafa
    Johnson, Craig
    Grimm, David
    McNeese, Nathan J.
    Gorman, Jamie C.
    Cooke, Nancy J.
    2019 IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON COGNITIVE AND COMPUTATIONAL ASPECTS OF SITUATION MANAGEMENT (COGSIMA), 2019, : 122 - 126
  • [29] The Evaluation of a Playbook Interface for Human-Autonomy Teaming in Single Pilot Operations
    Tokadli, Guliz
    Dorneich, Michael C.
    Matessa, Michael
    Eda, Seiya
    2019 IEEE/AIAA 38TH DIGITAL AVIONICS SYSTEMS CONFERENCE (DASC), 2019,
  • [30] Modelling situated intent for human-autonomy teaming: a human-centric approach
    Hammarback, Jimmy
    Johansson, Bjoern J. E.
    Alfredson, Jens
    Lundberg, Jonas
    THEORETICAL ISSUES IN ERGONOMICS SCIENCE, 2024, 25 (06) : 731 - 752