Influence of Timing Between Androgen Deprivation Therapy and External Beam Radiation Therapy in Patients With Localized, High-Risk Prostate Cancer

被引:2
作者
McCall, Neal S. [1 ]
Liu, Yuan [2 ]
Patel, Sagar A. [1 ]
Hershatter, Bruce [1 ]
Moghanaki, Drew [1 ]
Godette, Karen D. [1 ]
Hanasoge, Sheela [1 ]
Patel, Pretesh [1 ]
Fischer-Valuck, Benjamin W. [1 ]
Shelton, Joseph W. [1 ]
Jani, Ashesh B. [1 ]
机构
[1] Emory Univ, Winship Canc Inst, Dept Radiat Oncol, Atlanta, GA 30322 USA
[2] Emory Univ, Rollins Sch Publ Hlth, Dept Biostat & Bioinformat, Atlanta, GA 30322 USA
关键词
RADIOTHERAPY; SUPPRESSION; NEOADJUVANT; TRIAL;
D O I
10.1016/j.adro.2021.100803
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Purpose: Treatment with long-term androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) and radiation therapy (RT) is the nonsurgical standard-of-care for patients with high- or very high-risk prostate cancer (HR-PC), but the optimal timing between ADT and RT initiation is unknown. We evaluate the influence of timing between ADT and RT on outcomes in patients with HR-PC using a large national cancer database. Methods and Materials: Data for patients with clinical T1-T4 N0, M0, National Cancer Comprehensive Network HR-PC who were treated with definitive external RT (>= 60 Gy) and ADT starting either before or within 14 days after RT start were extracted from the National Cancer Database (2004-2015). Patients were grouped on the basis of ADT initiation: (1) >11 weeks before RT, (2) 8 to 1 1 weeks before RT, and (3) <8 weeks before RT. Kaplan-Meier, propensity score matching, and multivariable Cox proportional hazards were performed to evaluate overall survival (OS). Results: With a median follow-up of 68.9 months, 37,606 patients with HR-PC were eligible for analysis: 13,346 (35.5%) with >11 weeks of neoadjuvant ADT, 11,456 (30.5%) with 8 to 11 weeks of neoadjuvant ADT; and 12,804 (34%) patients with <8 weeks of neoadjuvant ADT. The unadjusted 10-year OS rates for >11 weeks, 8 to 11 weeks, and <8 weeks neoadjuvant ADT groups were 49.9%, 51.2%, and 46.9%, respectively (P = .002). On multivariable and inverse probability of treatment weighting analyses, there was a significant OS advantage for patients in the 8 to 11 weeks neoadjuvant ADT group (adjusted hazard ratio 0.90; 95% confidence interval, 0.86-0.95; P < .001) but not the >11 weeks group. Conclusions: Neoadjuvant ADT initiation 8 to 11 weeks before RT is associated with significantly improved OS compared with shorter neoadjuvant ADT duration. Although prospective validation is warranted, this analysis is the largest retrospective study suggesting an influence of timing between ADT and RT initiation in HR-PC. (C) 2021 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of American Society for Radiation Oncology.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 19 条
  • [1] Moving towards best practice when using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) using the propensity score to estimate causal treatment effects in observational studies
    Austin, Peter C.
    Stuart, Elizabeth A.
    [J]. STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2015, 34 (28) : 3661 - 3679
  • [2] A new approach to categorising continuous variables in prediction models: Proposal and validation
    Barrio, Irantzu
    Arostegui, Inmaculada
    Rodriguez-Alvarez, Maria-Xose
    Quintana, Jose-Maria
    [J]. STATISTICAL METHODS IN MEDICAL RESEARCH, 2017, 26 (06) : 2586 - 2602
  • [3] Short Androgen Suppression and Radiation Dose Escalation for Intermediate- and High-Risk Localized Prostate Cancer: Results of EORTC Trial 22991
    Bolla, Michel
    Maingon, Philippe
    Carrie, Christian
    Villa, Salvador
    Kitsios, Petros
    Poortmans, Philip M. P.
    Sundar, Santhanam
    van der Steen-Banasik, Elzbieta M.
    Armstrong, John
    Bosset, Jean-Francois
    Herrera, Fernanda G.
    Pieters, Bradley
    Slot, Annerie
    Bahl, Amit
    Ben-Yosef, Rahamim
    Boehmer, Dirk
    Scrase, Christopher
    Renard, Laurette
    Shash, Emad
    Coens, Corneel
    van den Bergh, Alphonsus C. M.
    Collette, Laurence
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 2016, 34 (15) : 1748 - +
  • [4] External irradiation with or without long-term androgen suppression for prostate cancer with high metastatic risk: 10-year results of an EORTC randomised study
    Bolla, Michel
    Van Tienhoven, Geertjan
    Warde, Padraig
    Dubois, Jean Bernard
    Mirimanoff, Rene-Olivier
    Storme, Guy
    Bernier, Jacques
    Kuten, Abraham
    Sternberg, Cora
    Billiet, Ignace
    Lopez Torecilla, Jose
    Pfeffer, Raphael
    Cutajar, Carmel Lino
    Van der Kwast, Theodore
    Collette, Laurence
    [J]. LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2010, 11 (11) : 1066 - 1073
  • [5] FINAL REPORT OF MULTICENTER CANADIAN PHASE III RANDOMIZED TRIAL OF 3 VERSUS 8 MONTHS OF NEOADJUVANT ANDROGEN DEPRIVATION THERAPY BEFORE CONVENTIONAL-DOSE RADIOTHERAPY FOR CLINICALLY LOCALIZED PROSTATE CANCER
    Crook, Juanita
    Ludgate, Charles
    Malone, Shawn
    Perry, Gad
    Eapen, Libni
    Bowen, Julie
    Robertson, Susan
    Lockwood, Gina
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2009, 73 (02): : 327 - 333
  • [6] Relative Timing of Radiotherapy and Androgen Deprivation for Prostate Cancer and Implications for Treatment During the COVID-19 Pandemic
    Dee, Edward Christopher
    Mahal, Brandon A.
    Arega, Melaku A.
    D'Amico, Anthony V.
    Mouw, Kent W.
    Nguyen, Paul L.
    Muralidhar, Vinayak
    [J]. JAMA ONCOLOGY, 2020, 6 (10) : 1630 - 1632
  • [7] Short-term androgen suppression and radiotherapy versus intermediate-term androgen suppression and radiotherapy, with or without zoledronic acid, in men with locally advanced prostate cancer (TROG 03.04 RADAR): 10-year results from a randomised, phase 3, factorial trial
    Denham, James W.
    Joseph, David
    Lamb, David S.
    Spry, Nigel A.
    Duchesne, Gillian
    Matthews, John
    Atkinson, Chris
    Tai, Keen-Hun
    Christie, David
    Kenny, Lizbeth
    Turner, Sandra
    Gogna, Nirdosh Kumar
    Diamond, Terry
    Delahunt, Brett
    Oldmeadow, Chris
    Attia, John
    Steigler, Allison
    [J]. LANCET ONCOLOGY, 2019, 20 (02) : 267 - 281
  • [8] Prostate-Specific Antigen After Neoadjuvant Androgen Suppression in Prostate Cancer Patients Receiving Short-Term Androgen Suppression and External Beam Radiation Therapy: Pooled Analysis of Four NRG Oncology Radiation Therapy Oncology Group Randomized Clinical Trials
    Hallemeier, Christopher L.
    Zhang, Peixin
    Pisansky, Thomas M.
    Hanks, Gerald E.
    McGowan, David G.
    Roach, Mack, III
    Zeitzer, Kenneth L.
    Firat, Selim Y.
    Husain, Siraj M.
    D'Souza, David P.
    Souhami, Luis
    Parliament, Matthew B.
    Rosenthal, Seth A.
    Lukka, Himanshu R.
    Rotman, Marvin
    Horwitz, Eric M.
    Miles, Edward F.
    Paulus, Rebecca
    Sandler, Howard M.
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF RADIATION ONCOLOGY BIOLOGY PHYSICS, 2019, 104 (05): : 1057 - 1065
  • [9] Comparison of neoadjuvant vs concurrent/adjuvant androgen deprivation in men with high-risk prostate cancer receiving definitive radiation therapy
    Lee, Anna
    Becker, Daniel J.
    Lederman, Ariel J.
    Osborn, Virginia W.
    Shao, Meng S.
    Wong, Andrew T.
    Schwartz, David
    Schreiber, David
    [J]. TUMORI, 2017, 103 (04) : 387 - 393
  • [10] Liu Yuan, 2018, F1000Res, V7, P1955, DOI 10.12688/f1000research.16866.2