What kind of local and regional development and for whom?

被引:236
作者
Pike, Andy [1 ]
Rodriguez-Pose, Andres [2 ]
Tomaney, John [1 ]
机构
[1] Newcastle Univ, CURDS, Newcastle Upon Tyne NE1 7RU, Tyne & Wear, England
[2] Univ London London Sch Econ & Polit Sci, Dept Geog & Environm, London WC2A 2AE, England
关键词
local; regional; development;
D O I
10.1080/00343400701543355
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This paper asks the question, what kind of local and regional development and for whom? It examines what is meant by local and regional development, its historical context, its geographies in space, territory, place and scale and its different varieties, principles and values. The socially uneven and geographically differentiated distribution of who and where benefits and loses from particular forms of local and regional development is analysed. A holistic, progressive and sustainable version of local and regional development is outlined with reflections upon its limits and political renewal. Locally and regionally determined development models should not be developed independently of more foundational principles and values such as democracy, equity, internationalism and justice. Specific local and regional articulations are normative questions and subject to social determination and political choices in particular national and international contexts.
引用
收藏
页码:1253 / 1269
页数:17
相关论文
共 108 条
  • [21] COOKE P, 1995, RISE RUSTBELT, P231
  • [22] Cowen M., 1996, Doctrines of development
  • [23] Cypher J., 2004, PROCESS EC DEV, VSecond
  • [24] Danson Mike, 2000, Governance, institutional change and regional development, P1
  • [25] Growth, inequality and cohesion: A comment on the Sapir Report
    Dunford, M
    [J]. REGIONAL STUDIES, 2005, 39 (07) : 972 - 978
  • [26] Fitzgerald J., 2002, EC REVITALIZATION CA
  • [27] Flyvbjerg B., 1998, RATIONALITY POWER DE
  • [28] A new regional policy for Britain
    Fothergill, S
    [J]. REGIONAL STUDIES, 2005, 39 (05) : 659 - 667
  • [29] Galbraith J., 1997, Good Society
  • [30] Geddes M., 1999, LOCAL ECON, V14, P12, DOI DOI 10.1080/02690949908726472