Dependence of two-proton radioactivity on nuclear pairing models

被引:23
|
作者
Oishi, Tomohiro [1 ,2 ,3 ,5 ]
Kortelainen, Markus [1 ,2 ]
Pastore, Alessandro [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Helsinki, Helsinki Inst Phys, POB 64, FI-00014 Helsinki, Finland
[2] Univ Jyvaskyla, Dept Phys, POB 35 YFL, FI-40014 Jyvaskyla, Finland
[3] Tohoku Univ, Res Ctr Electron Photon Sci, 1-2-1 Mikamine, Sendai, Miyagi 9820826, Japan
[4] Univ York, Dept Phys, York YO10 5DD, N Yorkshire, England
[5] Univ Padua, Dept Phys & Astron Galileo Galilei, Padua, Italy
基金
芬兰科学院;
关键词
QUASI-STATIONARY STATE; LIGHT-NUCLEI; 3-BODY SYSTEM; ENERGY-LEVELS; DRIP-LINE; DECAYS; LIMITS;
D O I
10.1103/PhysRevC.96.044327
中图分类号
O57 [原子核物理学、高能物理学];
学科分类号
070202 ;
摘要
Sensitivity of two-proton emitting decay to nuclear pairing correlation is discussed within a time-dependent three-body model. We focus on the Be-6 nucleus assuming alpha + p + p configuration, and its decay process is described as a time evolution of the three-body resonance state. For a proton-proton subsystem, a schematic density-dependent contact (SDDC) pairing model is employed. From the time-dependent calculation, we observed the exponential decay rule of a two-proton emission. It is shown that the density dependence does not play a major role in determining the decay width, which can be controlled only by the asymptotic strength of the pairing interaction. This asymptotic pairing sensitivity can be understood in terms of the dynamics of the wave function driven by the three-body Hamiltonian, by monitoring the time-dependent density distribution. With this simple SDDC pairing model, there remains an impossible trinity problem: it cannot simultaneously reproduce the empirical Q value, decay width, and the nucleon-nucleon scattering length. This problem suggests that a further sophistication of the theoretical pairing model is necessary, utilizing the two-proton radioactivity data as the reference quantities.
引用
收藏
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] TWO-PROTON RADIOACTIVITY - A TOOL FOR NUCLEAR STRUCTURE
    Blank, Bertram
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MODERN PHYSICS E-NUCLEAR PHYSICS, 2009, 18 (10) : 2124 - 2128
  • [2] TWO-PROTON RADIOACTIVITY AS A TOOL FOR NUCLEAR STRUCTURE
    Blank, B.
    Ascher, P.
    Audirac, L.
    Giovinazzo, J.
    Adimi, N.
    Canchel, G.
    Delalee, F.
    Demonchy, C. E.
    Dossat, C.
    Grevy, S.
    Hay, L.
    Huikari, J.
    Kurtukian-Nieto, T.
    Leblanc, S.
    Matea, I.
    Pedroza, J. -L.
    Pibernat, J.
    Serani, L.
    Santos, F. de Oliveira
    Perrot, L.
    Srivastava, P. C.
    Stodel, C.
    Thomas, J. -C.
    Borcea, C.
    Companis, I.
    Brown, B. A.
    Grigorenko, L. V.
    FRENCH-JAPANESE SYMPOSIUM ON NUCLEAR STRUCTURE PROBLEMS: ORGANIZED IN THE FRAMEWORK OF FJNSP LIA AND EFES, 2013, : 130 - 135
  • [3] Two-proton radioactivity
    Blank, Bertram
    Ploszajczak, Marek
    REPORTS ON PROGRESS IN PHYSICS, 2008, 71 (04)
  • [4] Two-proton radioactivity - A new nuclear decay mode
    Blank, B.
    Frontiers in Nuclear Structure Astrophysics, and Reactions: FINUSTAR, 2006, 831 : 352 - 359
  • [5] TWO-PROTON RADIOACTIVITY AS A TOOL OF NUCLEAR STRUCTURE STUDIES
    Blank, B.
    Ascher, P.
    Audirac, L.
    Canchel, G.
    Giovinazzo, J.
    Kurtukian-Nieto, T.
    Santos, F. de Oliveira
    Grevy, S.
    Thomas, J. -C.
    Borcea, C.
    Grigorenko, L. V.
    ACTA PHYSICA POLONICA B, 2011, 42 (3-4): : 545 - 553
  • [6] Two-proton radioactivity search
    I. G. Mukha
    Physics of Atomic Nuclei, 2003, 66 : 1519 - 1522
  • [7] Quest for two-proton radioactivity
    Pathak, Deepika
    Singh, Pardeep
    Parshad, Hiteshwar
    Kaur, Harjeet
    Jain, Sudhir R.
    EUROPEAN PHYSICAL JOURNAL PLUS, 2022, 137 (02):
  • [8] On the road to two-proton radioactivity
    Blank, B
    PHYSICS WORLD, 2001, 14 (01) : 23 - 24
  • [9] Two-proton radioactivity search
    Mukha, IG
    PHYSICS OF ATOMIC NUCLEI, 2003, 66 (08) : 1519 - 1522
  • [10] Landscape of Two-Proton Radioactivity
    Olsen, E.
    Pfuetzner, M.
    Birge, N.
    Brown, M.
    Nazarewicz, W.
    Perhac, A.
    PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS, 2013, 110 (22)