Novel submucosal lifting gel for performing endoscopic mucosal resection after precutting in large gastric lesions: An animal feasibility study

被引:0
|
作者
Jung, Yunho [1 ]
Kwon, Chang-Il [2 ]
Chung, Il-Kwun [1 ]
Kim, Gwangil [3 ]
Ko, Kwang Hyun [2 ]
Hong, Sung Pyo [2 ]
Jeong, Seok [4 ]
Lee, Don Haeng [4 ]
机构
[1] Soonchunhyang Univ, Coll Med, Dept Med, Div Gastroenterol, Cheonan, South Korea
[2] CHA Univ, CHA Bundang Med Ctr, Digest Dis Ctr, Seongnam, South Korea
[3] CHA Univ, CHA Bundang Med Ctr, Dept Pathol, Seongnam, South Korea
[4] Inha Univ, Sch Med, Dept Internal Med, Digest Dis Ctr, Incheon, South Korea
来源
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GASTROINTESTINAL INTERVENTION | 2020年 / 9卷 / 01期
关键词
En bloc; Endoscopic mucosal resection; Endoscopic submucosal dissection; DISSECTION; STOMACH; TUMORS;
D O I
10.18528/ijgii190020
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The submucosal lifting gel (Cook Medical Inc., Winston-Salem, NC, USA) is a novel injectate for submucosal lifting of gastrointestinal lesions. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of the novel submucosal lifting gel for performing endoscopic mucosal resection after pre-cutting (EMR-P) in large gastric lesions. Methods: A total of 31 artificial lesions were created on body of stomach by electrocautery marking with endoscopic ruler in five live micro-pigs. Three different groups were randomly assigned by the size of artificial lesion such as 3 cm (group 1, 11 cases), 3.5 cm (group 2, 10 cases), and 4 cm (group 3, 10 cases) in diameter. Then EMR-P was performed after injection the lifting gel sufficient unto submucosal layer. Independent observer recorded circumferential resection time, submucosal injection time, injection amount, total procedure time, en bloc and perforation rate. Results: The mean circumferential resection time was significantly longer in the group 3 in comparison with group 1 and 2 (6.7 +/- 1.7 min vs 4.2 +/- 1.4 min, P < 0.001 and 4.7 +/- 1.5 min, P = 0.004). The mean total procedure time and amount of injection were significant difference between three groups (9.6 +/- 2.2 min vs 12.9 +/- 2.6 min vs 17.4 +/- 2.2 min, P < 0.01) (5.2 +/- 1.1 mL vs 6.9 +/- 1.4 mL vs 9.3 +/- 3.0 mL, P = 0.02). The en bloc rate of each group was 90.9% (10/11), 60.0% (6/10), and 50.0% (5/10) in the group 1, 2, and 3 respectively. There was a perforation during circumferential cutting in group 2. Conclusion: In a porcine model, a new submucosal lifting gel seems to improve the en bloc rate for performing EMR-P in large gastric lesions, especially 3 cm in diameter. Copyright (c) 2020, Society of Gastrointestinal Intervention.
引用
收藏
页码:19 / 23
页数:5
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Comparison of precutting endoscopic mucosal resection and endoscopic submucosal dissection for large (20-30 mm) flat colorectal lesions
    Oh, Chang Kyo
    Cho, Young Wook
    Choi, In Hyoung
    Lee, Han Hee
    Lim, Chul-Hyun
    Kim, Jin Su
    Lee, Bo-In
    Cho, Young-Seok
    JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 2022, 37 (03) : 568 - 575
  • [2] Utility of Under-Gel Endoscopic Mucosal Resection with Partial Submucosal Injection and Under-Gel Precutting Endoscopic Mucosal Resection for Difficult Colorectal Polyp Cases
    Yamamoto, Kazuki
    Ikeya, Takashi
    Shiratori, Yasutoshi
    DIGESTIVE DISEASES, 2023, 41 (01) : 164 - 172
  • [3] A switch to endoscopic mucosal resection after precutting following gastric perforation during endoscopic submucosal dissection: a simple and useful technique
    Lee, D. W.
    Lee, H. S.
    Jung, M. K.
    Kim, S. K.
    Jeon, S. W.
    ENDOSCOPY, 2012, 44 (03) : 293 - 296
  • [4] Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection for Locally Recurrent Colorectal Lesions After Previous Endoscopic Mucosal Resection
    Zhou, Pinghong
    Yao, Liqing
    Qin, Xinyu
    Xu, Meidong
    Zhong, Yunshi
    Chen, Weifeng
    DISEASES OF THE COLON & RECTUM, 2009, 52 (02) : 305 - 310
  • [5] Feasibility of a novel self-assembling submucosal injection peptide solution for endoscopic mucosal resection of colorectal lesions: A multicenter study
    Sato, Keigo
    Fukuchi, Takehide
    Kondo, Shinpei
    Nakano, Yuya
    Hachisu, Yoko
    Kasuga, Kengo
    Matsui, Ayako
    Aoki, Hironori
    Takizawa, Kohei
    Kuribayashi, Shiko
    Takeuchi, Yoji
    Uraoka, Toshio
    DEN OPEN, 2025, 5 (01):
  • [6] Clinical outcomes of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) for treating early gastric cancer: Comparison with endoscopic mucosal resection after circumferential precutting (EMR-P)
    Min, B. -H.
    Lee, J. H.
    Kim, J. J.
    Shim, S. G.
    Chang, D. K.
    Kim, Y. -H.
    Rhee, P-L.
    Kim, K. -M.
    Park, C. K.
    Rhee, J. C.
    DIGESTIVE AND LIVER DISEASE, 2009, 41 (03) : 201 - 209
  • [7] Standard Endoscopic Mucosal Resection vs Precutting Endoscopic Mucosal Resection Using Novel Disk-Tip Snare for Colorectal Lesions
    Yoshida, Naohisa
    Inoue, Ken
    Hashimoto, Hikaru
    Kobayashi, Reo
    Tomita, Yuri
    Sugino, Satoshi
    Hirose, Ryohei
    Dohi, Osamu
    Morinaga, Yukiko
    Inada, Yutaka
    Murakami, Takaaki
    Itoh, Yoshito
    DIGESTIVE DISEASES AND SCIENCES, 2023, 68 (05) : 2030 - 2039
  • [8] Endoscopic submucosal dissection and endoscopic mucosal resection for esophageal and gastric lesions: A comparison of procedures
    Schaebel, Gustav Holm
    Mucha, Andreas Weise
    Egeland, Charlotte
    Achiam, Michael Patrick
    LAPAROSCOPIC ENDOSCOPIC AND ROBOTIC SURGERY, 2024, 7 (02): : 66 - 71
  • [9] Efficacy and safety of precutting endoscopic mucosal resection versus endoscopic submucosal dissection for non-ampullary superficial duodenal lesions
    Chen, Dawei
    Fu, Sunya
    Shen, Jianwei
    CLINICS AND RESEARCH IN HEPATOLOGY AND GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2024, 48 (03)
  • [10] Endoscopic submucosal dissection or piecemeal endoscopic mucosal resection for large superficial colorectal lesions: A cost effectiveness study
    Stephane, Scheer
    Timothee, Wallenhorst
    Jeremie, Albouys
    Raphael, Olivier
    Martin, Dahan
    Emmanuelle, Pauliat
    Elodie, Leclerc
    Quentin, Denost
    Nikki, Christou
    Sonia, Brischoux
    Hugo, Lepetit
    Guillaume, Gschwind
    Romain, Legros
    Mathieu, Pioche
    Sophie, Geyl
    Jeremie, Jacques
    CLINICS AND RESEARCH IN HEPATOLOGY AND GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2022, 46 (06)