Development and validation in Ecuador of the EPD Questionnaire, a diabetes-specific patient-reported experience and outcome measure: A mixed-methods study

被引:7
作者
Martin-Delgado, Jimmy [1 ,2 ,3 ]
Mula, Aurora [1 ]
Guilabert, Mercedes [4 ]
Solis, Carlos [5 ]
Gomez, Lorena [6 ]
Ramirez Amat, Gustavo [3 ]
Joaquin Mira, Jose [1 ,4 ,7 ]
机构
[1] Fdn Promot Hlth & Biomed Res, Atenea Res Grp, Alicante, Spain
[2] Univ Exeter, Hlth Serv & Policy Res Grp, Exeter, Devon, England
[3] Univ Catolica Santiago Guayaquil, Fac Ciencias Med, Inst Invest & Innovac Salud Integral, Guayaquil, Ecuador
[4] Miguel Hernandez Univ, Hlth Psychol Dept, Elche, Spain
[5] Hosp IEES Norte Los Ceibos, Endocrinol Serv, Guayaquil, Ecuador
[6] Ctr Salud 1 Ctr Hist, Directora Tecn Area, Quito, Ecuador
[7] Hlth Dist Alicante St Joan, Ctr Salud Hosp Pla, Alicante, Spain
关键词
diabetes; mixed-methods study; patient-reported experience measures; patient-reported outcome measures; questionnaire; vulnerable populations; CARE; HEALTH; ACTIVATION; QUALITY; SYSTEMS; ACCESS;
D O I
10.1111/hex.13366
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Introduction The global prevalence of diabetes in 2019 in adults was estimated to be 9.3%. This study developed in Ecuador, for the first time, instruments to assess patient-reported outcomes and experiences. Methods The Experiences of the Person with Diabetes (EPD) Questionnaire is a diabetes-specific instrument. A mixed-methods study was conducted. First, a qualitative item development phase that included four focus groups and six semi-structured interviews with patients was conducted in different rural and urban areas of Ecuador to obtain information on culture, beliefs, demographics, diet and social perspectives. A second quantitative phase for psychometric validation was carried out in primary care settings of rural and urban areas of Ecuador. Results Forty-two and four hundred and eighty-nine participants were included in each phase, respectively. The item development phase resulted in a questionnaire of 44 items (23 for perceived outcomes and 21 for experiences). In the validation study, most participants were women (58%) and from urban areas (57%). Exploratory factor analysis revealed three dimensions for each instrument. Outcomes instrument dimensions were symptoms and burnout, worries and fears and social limitations. Experiences instrument dimensions were information, patient-centred care and care delivery. Cronbach's alpha values of the total score and dimensions were high, ranging between .81 and .93 in both instruments. Confirmatory factor analysis showed an acceptable fit of the data. Conclusion The EPD Questionnaire is probably the first instrument developed to assess patient-reported experiences and perceived outcomes in a middle-income country that included patients to capture all dimensions relevant for the intended population. Its psychometric properties are robust and could provide valuable information for clinicians and policymakers in the region. Patient or Public Contribution The development of these instruments has taken into consideration patients and the public since their conception. A qualitative approach gathered relevant information related to the cultural, social and economic burden of different populations in Ecuador. Before validation, a pilot test was carried out with users of the National Health Services to obtain their perspectives and insights of the developed instrument. Finally, during the data analysis, we have given special consideration to social variables such as rural and urban populations.
引用
收藏
页码:2134 / 2146
页数:13
相关论文
共 53 条
  • [1] Atupana Chimbolema N., 2017, ESTADO COSMOVISION M
  • [2] Using collaborative learning to improve diabetes care and outcomes: The VIDA project
    Barcelo, Alberto
    Cafiero, Elizabeth
    de Boer, Melanie
    Mesa, Alejandro Escobar
    Lopez, Marcelina Garcia
    Jimenez, Rosa Aurora
    Esqueda, Agustin Lara
    Martinez, Jose Antonio
    Holguin, Esperanza Medina
    Meiners, Micheline
    Bonfil, Gerson Moreno
    Ramirez, Saturnino Navarro
    Flores, Enrique Perez
    Robles, Sylvia
    [J]. PRIMARY CARE DIABETES, 2010, 4 (03) : 145 - 153
  • [3] The Triple Aim: Care, health, and cost
    Berwick, Donald M.
    Nolan, Thomas W.
    Whittington, John
    [J]. HEALTH AFFAIRS, 2008, 27 (03) : 759 - 769
  • [4] Best Practices for Developing and Validating Scales for Health,Social, and Behavioral Research:A Primer
    Boateng, Godfred O.
    Neilands, Torsten B.
    Frongillo, Edward A.
    Melgar-Quinonez, Hugo R.
    Young, Sera L.
    [J]. FRONTIERS IN PUBLIC HEALTH, 2018, 6
  • [5] The development of an individualized questionnaire measure of perceived impact of diabetes on quality of life: the ADDQoL
    Bradley, C
    Todd, C
    Gorton, T
    Symonds, E
    Martin, A
    Plowright, R
    [J]. QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 1999, 8 (1-2) : 79 - 91
  • [6] Bradley C., 1994, HDB PSYCHOL DIABETES, V1st, DOI [10.4324/9781315077369, DOI 10.4324/9781315077369]
  • [7] Is Equity of Access to Health Care Achievable in Latin America?
    Branco Araujo, Gabriela Tannus
    Caporale, Joaquin E.
    Stefani, Stephen
    Pinto, Diana
    Caso, Antonio
    [J]. VALUE IN HEALTH, 2011, 14 (05) : S8 - S12
  • [8] Examining the ability to detect change using the TRIM-Diabetes and TRIM-Diabetes Device measures
    Brod, Meryl
    Christensen, Torsten
    Hammer, Mette
    Busk, Anne K.
    Bushnell, Donald M.
    [J]. QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH, 2011, 20 (09) : 1513 - 1518
  • [9] Canizares Fuentes R., 2016, MEDICINA-BUENOS AIRE, V19, P193, DOI [10.23878/medicina.v19i4, DOI 10.23878/MEDICINA.V19I4]
  • [10] Chan EKH, 2014, SOC INDIC RES SER, V54, P9, DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-07794-9_2