Universal neonatal hearing screening: The Siena (Italy) experience on 19,700 newborns

被引:43
作者
De Capua, Bruno
Costantini, Daniele
Martufi, Carla
Latini, Giuseppe
Gentile, Mattia
De Felice, Claudio
机构
[1] Azienda Ospedaliera Univ Senese, Policlin Santa Maria Scotte, UOC Terapia Intens Neonatale, DAI Maternoinfantile, I-53100 Siena, Italy
[2] Azienda Ospedaliera Univ Senese, UOS Audiol Clin, Siena, Italy
[3] Azienda Ospedaliera Univ Senese, UOC Otorinolaringoiatria, Dipartimento Cefal & Scheletr, Siena, Italy
[4] Perrino Hosp, Div Neonatol, Brindisi, Italy
[5] CNR, IFC, Natl Res Council Italy, Inst Clin Physiol,Lecce Sect, I-00185 Rome, Italy
[6] Osped Venere, Med Genet Unit, Bari, Italy
关键词
hearing loss; newborn; universal neonatal hearing screening; risk factors;
D O I
10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2007.01.001
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Background: Hearing loss (HL) is likely to be the most common congenital abnormality in humans, with a reported prevalence of 1 to 3 per 1000 live births. Early detection and intervention is critical to prevent the adverse consequences of a delayed diagnosis on speech, language and cognitive development. As 33-50% of all congenital HLs cannot be detected in a selective hearing risk, use of universal neonatal hearing screening (UNHS) programs is expanding. Aims: We tested the value of a UNHS protocol, based on a two-stage strategy of Transient Evoked Otoacoustic Emissions (TEOAEs) in all. infants, followed by diagnostic auditory brainstem response (ABR) testing in those infants who did not meet TEOAE pass criteria and those infants at high risk for hearing loss. Methods: TEOAES (292 DP Echoport OAE Analyzer) served as the initial screen, followed by diagnostic ABR (Amplaid MK12) in newborns that did not meet pass criteria for TEOAEs. Additionally, all infants at high audiologic risk according to the Joint Committee on Infant Hearing received a diagnostic ABR evaluation. Of 21,125 total live births, 19,700 were tested (April 1, 1998-July 31, 2006). Accuracy of the UNHS strategy in predicting congenital HL was evaluated by calculating sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value. Results: Prevalence for all HLs in the neonatal period was 1.78/1000 Lb. (35/19,700), with bilateral HL in 1.42/1000 Lb. (28/19,700) [tow risk rate: 0.43/1000 l.b. (8/18,356); high risk infants rate: 14.88/1000 l.b. (20/1344)]. AR the HL infants were diagnosed <3 and received intervention <6 months age. ROC curves results showed 100% sensitivity (95% C.I.: 89.0-100) and 99.3% specificity (95% C. I.: 99.2-99.4) of the two-stage strategy in detecting congenital HLs area under the ROC curve: 0.997 (95% C.I.: 0.995-0.997)]. Conclusions: (1) The epidemiology of congenital HLs widely justifies UNHS; (2) a two-stage TEOAE and diagnostic ABR screening for congenital HL is feasible, minimally invasive and accurate in the early detection of congenital HL; and (3) a congenital HL screening strategy based exclusively on the use of TEOAEs should always consider the possibility of false negative cases. (C) 2007 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:601 / 606
页数:6
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]  
BOISHARDY AD, 2005, ANN OTOLARYNGOL CHIR, V122, P223
[2]   Auditory neuropathy characteristics in children with cochlear nerve [J].
Buchman, Craig A. ;
Roush, Patricia A. ;
Teagle, Holly F. B. ;
Brown, Carolyn J. ;
Zdanski, Carlton J. ;
Grose, John H. .
EAR AND HEARING, 2006, 27 (04) :399-408
[3]  
*CDC, 2003, MMWR-MORBID MORTAL W, V52, P981
[4]   Universal newborn hearing screening: Are we achieving the Joint Committee on Infant Hearing (JCIH) objectives? [J].
Connolly, JL ;
Carron, JD ;
Roark, SD .
LARYNGOSCOPE, 2005, 115 (02) :232-236
[5]  
Courtmans I, 2005, Rev Med Brux, V26, P11
[6]  
De Capua B, 2003, Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital, V23, P16
[7]  
DEALEDOLINOS AG, 2005, ANN PEDIAT BARC, V62, P135
[8]  
DEMICHELE AM, 2005, NEWBORN HEARING SCRE
[9]   Clinical features of the prevalent form of childhood deafness, DFNB1, due to a connexin-26 gene defect:: implications for genetic counselling [J].
Denoyelle, F ;
Marlin, S ;
Weil, D ;
Moatti, L ;
Chauvin, P ;
Garabédian, EN ;
Petit, C .
LANCET, 1999, 353 (9161) :1298-1303