Evaluation of the sensitivity of reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction to detect porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus on individual and pooled samples from boars

被引:44
作者
Rovira, Albert
Clement, Travis
Christopher-Hennings, Jane
Thompson, Bob
Engle, Mark
Reicks, Darwin
Munoz-Zanzi, Claudia
机构
[1] Univ Minnesota, Coll Vet Med, Dept Vet Populat Med, St Paul, MN 55108 USA
[2] Univ Minnesota, Sch Publ Hlth, Div Epidemiol & Community Hlth, Minneapolis, MN 55454 USA
[3] S Dakota State Univ, Dept Vet Sci, Brookings, SD 57007 USA
[4] PIC, Hendersonville, TN 37075 USA
[5] Swine Vet Ctr, St Peter, MN 56082 USA
关键词
blood swab; boar; PCR; pooling; PRRS virus; semen; sensitivity; serum;
D O I
10.1177/104063870701900507
中图分类号
S85 [动物医学(兽医学)];
学科分类号
0906 ;
摘要
Boar studs are continuously monitored for the presence of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus (PRRSV) by testing different biological samples by reverse-transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). In most cases, samples are run in pools, even though the impact of pooling on the sensitivity of RT-PCR is unknown. The objective of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of using PCR on pooled samples through the estimation of the sensitivity of RT-PCR on different biological samples run individually, in pools of 3 and in pools of 5. Twenty-nine boars were inoculated with a low virulent PRRSV isolate. Serum, blood swab, and semen samples were obtained from each boar every 2 to 3 days for 2 weeks. Each sample was tested by RT-PCR undiluted or diluted 1:3 and 1:5 with negative samples. Eleven of the 29 boars did not appear to get infected from the inoculum, as evidenced by no seroconversion 15 days after inoculation. Data from the other 18 boars showed that serum was the best sample to detect PRRSV during acute infection, with the blood swab sample performing almost as well. Semen samples failed to detect PRRSV infection in most of the cases. Pooling samples at pool sizes of 3 and 5 resulted in a decrease in the sensitivity of RT-PCR. Sensitivity was reduced by 6% and 8%, respectively, when serum or blood swab samples were run in pools of 5. The impact of pooling on the sensitivity of PCR was higher in samples taken during the beginning of the viremic period.
引用
收藏
页码:502 / 509
页数:8
相关论文
共 27 条
  • [1] Interval estimation for a binomial proportion - Comment - Rejoinder
    Brown, LD
    Cai, TT
    DasGupta, A
    Agresti, A
    Coull, BA
    Casella, G
    Corcoran, C
    Mehta, C
    Ghosh, M
    Santner, TJ
    Brown, LD
    Cai, TT
    DasGupta, A
    [J]. STATISTICAL SCIENCE, 2001, 16 (02) : 101 - 133
  • [2] Evaluation of the effects of animal age, concurrent bacterial infection, and pathogenicity of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus on virus concentration in pigs
    Cho, JG
    Dee, SA
    Deen, J
    Guedes, A
    Trincado, C
    Fano, E
    Jiang, Y
    Faaberg, K
    Collins, JE
    Murtaugh, MP
    Joo, HS
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF VETERINARY RESEARCH, 2006, 67 (03) : 489 - 493
  • [3] CHOMCZYNSKI P, 1987, ANAL BIOCHEM, V162, P156, DOI 10.1016/0003-2697(87)90021-2
  • [4] Identification of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus in semen and tissues from vasectomized and nonvasectomized boars
    Christopher-Hennings, J
    Nelson, EA
    Nelson, JK
    Rossow, KD
    Shivers, JL
    Yaeger, MJ
    Chase, CCL
    Garduno, RA
    Collins, JE
    Benfield, DA
    [J]. VETERINARY PATHOLOGY, 1998, 35 (04) : 260 - 267
  • [5] Detection and duration of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus in semen, serum, peripheral blood mononuclear cells, and tissues from Yorkshire, Hampshire, and Landrace boars
    Christopher-Hennings, J
    Holler, LD
    Benfield, DA
    Nelson, EA
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VETERINARY DIAGNOSTIC INVESTIGATION, 2001, 13 (02) : 133 - 142
  • [6] Comparison of RNA extraction methods for the detection of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus from boar semen
    Christopher-Hennings, Jane
    Dammen, Matthew
    Nelson, Eric
    Rowland, Raymond
    Oberst, Richard
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VIROLOGICAL METHODS, 2006, 136 (1-2) : 248 - 253
  • [7] DETECTION OF PORCINE REPRODUCTIVE AND RESPIRATORY SYNDROME VIRUS IN BOAR SEMEN BY PCR
    CHRISTOPHERHENNINGS, J
    NELSON, EA
    NELSON, JK
    HINES, RJ
    SWENSON, SL
    HILL, HT
    ZIMMERMAN, JJ
    KATZ, JB
    YAEGER, MJ
    CHASE, CCL
    BENFIELD, DA
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 1995, 33 (07) : 1730 - 1734
  • [8] ChristopherHennings J, 1997, AM J VET RES, V58, P40
  • [9] Porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus: Seminal transmission
    Gradil, C
    Dubuc, C
    Eaglesome, MD
    [J]. VETERINARY RECORD, 1996, 138 (21) : 521 - 522
  • [10] Probability of porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome (PRRS) virus infection as a function of exposure route and dose
    Hermann, JR
    Muñoz-Zanzi, CA
    Roof, MB
    Burkhart, K
    Zimmerman, JJ
    [J]. VETERINARY MICROBIOLOGY, 2005, 110 (1-2) : 7 - 16