Students' understanding of acids/bases in organic chemistry contexts

被引:84
作者
Cartrette, David P. [1 ]
Mayo, Provi M. [2 ]
机构
[1] S Dakota State Univ, Dept Chem & Biochem, Brookings, SD 57007 USA
[2] Indiana Univ Purdue Univ, Dept Chem, Ft Wayne, IN 46805 USA
关键词
organic chemistry; problem solving; conceptual understanding; acids/bases; HIGH-SCHOOL-STUDENTS; UNIVERSITY-STUDENTS; TEACHERS KNOWLEDGE; BASE; ACID; CONCEPTIONS; MODELS; NOTIONS; SCIENCE; PH;
D O I
10.1039/C1RP90005F
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Understanding key foundational principles is vital to learning chemistry across different contexts. One such foundational principle is the acid/base behavior of molecules. In the general chemistry sequence, the Bronsted-Lowry theory is stressed, because it lends itself well to studying equilibrium and kinetics. However, the Lewis theory of acids/bases is more broadly applicable beyond general chemistry, especially in organic chemistry, where direct correlations can be drawn between Lewis acids/bases and the underpinnings of mechanistic prediction. This study reports the outcomes of an investigation of organic chemistry students' understanding and application of acid/base theories in organic chemistry contexts. Participants completed problem-solving interviews, which included tasks related to acid/base understanding such as predicting acid strength and explaining nucleophiles/electrophiles. The results indicated that most students maintain declarative knowledge rooted in general chemistry training related to acids/bases, but they can't apply it in problem solving tasks. This assertion held true for most participants, whether chemistry majors or pre-professional majors. Further, flaws in student conceptual understanding of acid/base chemistry principles were revealed.
引用
收藏
页码:29 / 39
页数:11
相关论文
共 49 条
[31]  
2-G
[32]  
Marton F., 1986, J THOUGHT, V21, P28, DOI DOI 10.2307/42589189
[33]  
Marton F., 1994, The International Encyclopedia of Education, P4424
[34]   INFLUENCE OF LEVELS OF INFORMATION AS PRESENTED BY DIFFERENT TECHNOLOGIES ON STUDENTS UNDERSTANDING OF ACID, BASE, AND PH CONCEPTS [J].
NAKHLEH, MB ;
KRAJCIK, JS .
JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN SCIENCE TEACHING, 1994, 31 (10) :1077-1096
[35]   A PROTOCOL ANALYSIS OF THE INFLUENCE OF TECHNOLOGY ON STUDENTS ACTIONS, VERBAL COMMENTARY, AND THOUGHT PROCESSES DURING THE PERFORMANCE OF ACID-BASE TITRATIONS [J].
NAKHLEH, MB ;
KRAJCIK, JS .
JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN SCIENCE TEACHING, 1993, 30 (09) :1149-1168
[36]  
Orgill M., 2004, Chemistry Education: Research and Practice, V5, P15
[37]  
Pressley M., 1995, Verbal protocols of reading: The nature of con- structively responsive reading
[38]   CONCEPT MAPPING AND MISCONCEPTIONS - A STUDY OF HIGH-SCHOOL-STUDENTS UNDERSTANDING OF ACIDS AND BASES [J].
ROSS, B ;
MUNBY, H .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENCE EDUCATION, 1991, 13 (01) :11-23
[39]   A LABEL AS A HIDDEN PERSUADER - CHEMISTS NEUTRALIZATION CONCEPT [J].
SCHMIDT, HJ .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SCIENCE EDUCATION, 1991, 13 (04) :459-471
[40]  
SCHMIDT HJ, 1999, CHEM EDUC RES PRACT, V1, P459