Lived time and the affordances of clinical research participation

被引:3
作者
Brenman, Natassia [1 ,2 ]
Milne, Richard [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Goldsmiths Univ London, Dept Sociol, London, England
[2] Univ Cambridge, Dept Publ Hlth & Primary Care, Cambridge, England
[3] Wellcome Connecting Sci, Soc & Eth Res, Cambridge, England
基金
英国惠康基金;
关键词
affordances; dementia; motivations; research participation; temporality; ALZHEIMERS-DISEASE; THERAPEUTIC MISCONCEPTION; DEMENTIA; FUTURE; PREVENTION; DISABILITY; PEOPLE; CARE;
D O I
10.1111/1467-9566.13374
中图分类号
R1 [预防医学、卫生学];
学科分类号
1004 ; 120402 ;
摘要
In this article, we address the problem of participation and the dominant focus on motivations in clinical research. We explore participation as a relational mode of 'being in time' in Alzheimer's dementia prevention-a field profoundly shaped by changing bodies through time, as well as promissory trends towards future-oriented preventative medicine. Analysis of interviews with older adults in a clinical trial platform demonstrates that what research 'does' or might (not) 'do' for participants emerges as temporalities of participants' everyday lives become entangled with the possibilities, constraints and demands of biomedical 'research time'. As well as consistent desires to help (future) others, we identify incidental possibilities for care that emerged from continued research participation. We argue that longitudinal research participation can productively be understood as a set of evolving affordances: whereby differing limits and possibilities for care and agency emerge in a world where dementia cannot be cured. Future trial participation is considered in terms of 'therapeutic affordances', which are likely to fluctuate as certain lived or imagined futures unfold. As such, we open up a conceptual space to think about why, how, and critically, when participation happens, as it emerges in relation to lived times of ageing and everyday life.
引用
收藏
页码:2031 / 2048
页数:18
相关论文
共 57 条
[1]   Time [J].
Adam, Barbara .
THEORY CULTURE & SOCIETY, 2006, 23 (2-3) :119-126
[2]   Configuring the patient as clinical research subject in the UK national health service [J].
Adams, Mary ;
McKevitt, Christopher .
ANTHROPOLOGY & MEDICINE, 2015, 22 (02) :138-148
[3]   FALSE HOPES AND BEST DATA - CONSENT TO RESEARCH AND THE THERAPEUTIC MISCONCEPTION [J].
APPELBAUM, PS ;
ROTH, LH ;
LIDZ, CW ;
BENSON, P ;
WINSLADE, W .
HASTINGS CENTER REPORT, 1987, 17 (02) :20-24
[4]   "Ready for What?": Timing and Speculation in Alzheimer's Disease Drug Development [J].
Brenman, Natassia F. ;
Milne, Richard .
SCIENCE TECHNOLOGY & HUMAN VALUES, 2022, 47 (03) :597-622
[5]   Extending experimentation: oncology's fading boundary between research and care [J].
Cambrosio, Alberto ;
Keating, Peter ;
Vignola-Gagne, Etienne ;
Besle, Sylvain ;
Bourret, Pascale .
NEW GENETICS AND SOCIETY, 2018, 37 (03) :207-226
[6]   Postgenomics, uncertain futures, and the familiarization of susceptibility genes [J].
Chilibeck, Gillian ;
Lock, Margaret ;
Sehdev, Megha .
SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE, 2011, 72 (11) :1768-1775
[7]  
Chilvers J, 2016, REMAKING PARTICIPATION: SCIENCE, ENVIRONMENT AND EMERGENT PUBLICS, P1
[8]   Blood and the public body: a study of UK blood donation and research participation [J].
Cohn, Simon .
CRITICAL PUBLIC HEALTH, 2016, 26 (01) :24-35
[9]   A New Initiative on Precision Medicine [J].
Collins, Francis S. ;
Varmus, Harold .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2015, 372 (09) :793-795
[10]   People as Affordances Building Disability Worlds through Care Intimacy [J].
Dokumaci, Arseli .
CURRENT ANTHROPOLOGY, 2020, 61 :S97-S108