The Management of Symptomatic Lumbar Disc Herniation in Pregnancy: A Systematic Review

被引:6
作者
Whiles, Emily [1 ]
Shafafy, Roozbeh [2 ]
Valsamis, Epaminondas Markos [3 ]
Horton, Chris [4 ]
Morassi, Giuseppe Lambros [1 ]
Stokes, Oliver [5 ]
Elsayed, Sherief [1 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Brighton & Sussex Univ Hosp NHS Trust, Brighton, E Sussex, England
[2] Barts Hlth NHS Trust, Royal London Hosp, London, England
[3] Oxford Univ Hosp NHS Trust, Nuffield Orthopaed Ctr, Oxford, England
[4] Univ Oxford, Sir William Dunn Sch Pathol, Oxford, England
[5] Royal Devon & Exeter NHS Fdn Trust, London, England
[6] NMC Spine, Dubai, U Arab Emirates
关键词
lumbar; disc; herniation; pregnancy; CAUDA-EQUINA SYNDROME; CESAREAN DELIVERY; 3RD TRIMESTER; BACK-PAIN; DISKECTOMY; ANESTHESIA; SURGERY;
D O I
10.1177/2192568219886264
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Study Design: Systematic review. Objectives: Lumbar disc herniation (LDH) has been reported to affect 1 in 10 000 pregnant women. There is limited evidence available regarding the optimal management of LDH in pregnant patients. We aimed to review the current evidence for the management of symptomatic LDH in pregnancy through critical appraisal and analysis of the available literature. Methods: Searches were conducted in Medline, Embase, PubMed, Science Direct, and The Cochrane Library from inception using predetermined search terms. All peer-reviewed studies of pregnant women with symptomatic LDH were included. The quality of eligible articles was assessed and extracted data and characteristics were pooled for analysis. References cited by studies were screened to identify other relevant publications. Results: Thirty studies involving 52 patients were identified. Compared to surgically managed patients, conservatively managed patients had a higher full recovery rate (61.54% vs 56.41%) and reported a lower rate of persistent symptoms (30.77% vs 38.54%). Compared to patients who were treated surgically for cauda equina syndrome, patients treated surgically for sciatica had a higher full recovery rate (80.95% vs 27.78%) and reported a lower rate of persistent symptoms (14.29% vs 66.67%). Conclusion: There is limited evidence to guide the management of pregnant patients with LDH. Despite a suggestion toward improved outcomes with conservative management, the presence of selection bias and the overall poor quality of current research precludes reliable conclusions from being drawn. Decision making for this patient group should be undertaken within a multidisciplinary setting.
引用
收藏
页码:908 / 918
页数:11
相关论文
共 47 条
  • [1] Lumbar discectomy in pregnancy
    Abou-Shameh, MA
    Dosani, D
    Gopal, S
    McLaren, AG
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GYNECOLOGY & OBSTETRICS, 2006, 92 (02) : 167 - 169
  • [2] Al-Areibi A, 2007, CAN J ANAESTH, V54, P471, DOI 10.1007/BF03022034
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2011, Obstet Gynecol, V474, P420
  • [4] Lumbar disk herniation during pregnancy: a review on general management and timing of surgery
    Ardaillon, Hugo
    Laviv, Yosef
    Arle, Jeffrey E.
    Kasper, Ekkehard M.
    [J]. ACTA NEUROCHIRURGICA, 2018, 160 (07) : 1361 - 1370
  • [5] Pregnancy and childbirth after microsurgery for lumbar disc herniation
    Berkmann, Sven
    Fandino, Javier
    [J]. ACTA NEUROCHIRURGICA, 2012, 154 (02) : 329 - 334
  • [6] Musculoskeletal aspects of pregnancy
    Borg-Stein, J
    Dugan, SA
    Gruber, J
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL MEDICINE & REHABILITATION, 2005, 84 (03) : 180 - 192
  • [7] Lumbar disc excision and cesarean delivery during the same anesthesia - A case report
    Brown, MD
    Brookfield, KF
    [J]. JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2004, 86A (09) : 2030 - 2032
  • [8] Surgery for lumbar disc herniation during pregnancy
    Brown, MD
    Levi, ADO
    [J]. SPINE, 2001, 26 (04) : 440 - 443
  • [9] Capitan B.A., 2017, Rev. Espanola Cirugia Ortopedica Traumatol, V61, P63, DOI [10.1016/j.recot.2015.05.004, DOI 10.1016/J.RECOT.2015.05.004]
  • [10] Cauda equina syndrome in early pregnancy: a case report
    Curtin, P.
    Rice, J.
    [J]. ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2007, 86 (06) : 758 - 759