Development of a Core Set of Patient-Reported Outcomes for Population-Based Cancer Survivorship Research: Protocol for an Australian Consensus Study

被引:3
作者
Ramsey, Imogen [1 ,2 ]
Corsini, Nadia [1 ,2 ]
Hutchinson, Amanda D. [3 ]
Marker, Julie [4 ]
Eckert, Marion [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ South Australia, Sch Nursing, Rosemary Bryant AO Res Ctr, City East Campus,North Terrace, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia
[2] Univ South Australia, Midwifery & UniSA Canc Res Inst, City East Campus,North Terrace, Adelaide, SA 5001, Australia
[3] Univ South Australia, Sch Psychol Social Work & Social Policy, Adelaide, SA, Australia
[4] Canc Voices South Australia, Adelaide, SA, Australia
来源
JMIR RESEARCH PROTOCOLS | 2020年 / 9卷 / 01期
关键词
cancer survivorship; quality of life; patient-reported outcomes; core outcome set; Delphi study; consensus; DELPHI;
D O I
10.2196/14544
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Core outcome sets seek to improve the consistency and quality of research by providing agreed-upon recommendations regarding what outcomes should be measured as a minimum for a population and setting. The problems arising from a lack of outcome standardization in population-based cancer survivorship research indicate the need for agreement on a core set of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) to enhance data quality, consistency, and comparability. Objective: This study aims to identify a core set of PROs, representing the most important issues impacting on cancer survivors' long-term health, functioning and quality of life, to inform population-based research on cancer survivorship. Methods: In Phase I, a list of all potentially important outcomes will be generated through focus group discussions with cancer survivors and a review of measures for assessing quality of life in cancer survivorship. The consolidated list will be advanced to Phase II, where a stakeholder consensus process will be conducted with national experts in cancer survivorship to refine and prioritize the outcomes into a core outcome set. The process will consist of a two-round Delphi survey and a consensus meeting. Cancer survivors, oncology health care professionals, and potential end users of the core outcome set with expertise in cancer survivorship research or policy will be invited to participate. In Phase III, recommended measures for assessment of the core outcome set will be selected with advice from experts on the assessment, analysis, and interpretation of PROs. Results: As of April 2019, data collection for Phase I is complete and data analysis is underway. These data will inform the list of outcomes to be advanced into Phase II. Recruitment for Phase II will commence in June 2019, and it is anticipated that it will take 6 months to complete the three-step consensus process and identify a provisional core outcome set. The study results are expected to be published in early 2020. Conclusions: Expert consensus-driven recommendations on outcome measurement will facilitate the inclusion of survivorship outcomes considered important by cancer survivors and health professionals in future research. Adoption of the core outcome set will enable comparison and synthesis of evidence across studies and enhance the quality of PRO data collected in cancer survivorship research, particularly when applied to address macro-level questions.
引用
收藏
页数:8
相关论文
共 36 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 2013, LONG TERM FOLL GUID
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2017, TRIALS, DOI DOI 10.1186/S13063-017-1788-8
  • [3] Developing Core Outcome Measurement Sets for Clinical Trials: OMERACT Filter 2.0
    Boers, Maarten
    Kirwan, John R.
    Wells, George
    Beaton, Dorcas
    Gossec, Laure
    d'Agostino, Maria-Antonietta
    Conaghan, Philip G.
    Bingham, Clifton O., III
    Brooks, Peter
    Landewe, Robert
    March, Lyn
    Simon, Lee S.
    Singh, Jasvinder A.
    Strand, Vibeke
    Tugwell, Peter
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2014, 67 (07) : 745 - 753
  • [4] Using and Reporting the Delphi Method for Selecting Healthcare Quality Indicators: A Systematic Review
    Boulkedid, Rym
    Abdoul, Hendy
    Loustau, Marine
    Sibony, Olivier
    Alberti, Corinne
    [J]. PLOS ONE, 2011, 6 (06):
  • [5] Chen RC, 2014, JNCI-J NATL CANCER I, V106, P7, DOI DOI 10.1093/JNCI/DJU132]
  • [6] Recommended Patient-Reported Core Set of Symptoms to Measure in Head and Neck Cancer Treatment Trials
    Chera, Bhishamjit S.
    Eisbruch, Avraham
    Murphy, Barbara A.
    Ridge, John A.
    Gavin, Patrick
    Reeve, Bryce B.
    Bruner, Deborah Watkins
    Movsas, Benjamin
    [J]. JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2014, 106 (07):
  • [7] Core outcome sets for research and clinical practice
    Chiarotto, Alessandro
    Ostelo, Raymond W.
    Turk, Dennis C.
    Buchbinder, Rachelle
    Boers, Maarten
    [J]. BRAZILIAN JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL THERAPY, 2017, 21 (02) : 77 - 84
  • [8] Cancer survivorship monitoring systems for the collection of patient-reported outcomes: a systematic narrative review of international approaches
    Corsini, N.
    Fish, J.
    Ramsey, I.
    Sharplin, G.
    Flight, I.
    Damarell, R.
    Wiggins, B.
    Wilson, C.
    Roder, D.
    Eckert, M.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CANCER SURVIVORSHIP, 2017, 11 (04) : 486 - 497
  • [9] Custer R.L., 1999, Journal of Vocational and Technical Education, V15, P50, DOI DOI 10.21061/JCTE.V15I2.702
  • [10] Defining consensus: A systematic review recommends methodologic criteria for reporting of Delphi studies
    Diamond, Ivan R.
    Grant, Robert C.
    Feldman, Brian M.
    Pencharz, Paul B.
    Ling, Simon C.
    Moore, Aideen M.
    Wales, Paul W.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2014, 67 (04) : 401 - 409