Cavitation Phenomena in Mechanical Heart Valves: Studied by Using a Physical Impinging Rod System

被引:12
作者
Lo, Chi-Wen [2 ]
Chen, Sheng-Fu [3 ]
Li, Chi-Pei [1 ]
Lu, Po-Chien [1 ]
机构
[1] Tamkang Univ, Tamsui 251, Taipei County, Taiwan
[2] Natl Hlth Res Inst, Natl Inst Canc Res, Tainan 70456, Taiwan
[3] Natl Hlth Res Inst, Div Med Engn, Miaoli 350, Taiwan
关键词
Cavitation; Mechanical heart valve; Physical model; Squeeze flow; Water hammer; Vortex; STRUCTURE INTERACTION SIMULATION; ARTIFICIAL-HEART; FLOW DYNAMICS; VELOCITY; PROSTHESES; INITIATION; VORTICES; CLOSURE;
D O I
10.1007/s10439-010-0070-y
中图分类号
R318 [生物医学工程];
学科分类号
0831 ;
摘要
When studying mechanical heart valve cavitation, a physical model allows direct flow field and pressure measurements that are difficult to perform with actual valves, as well as separate testing of water hammer and squeeze flow effects. Movable rods of 5 and 10 mm diameter impinged same-sized stationary rods to simulate squeeze flow. A 24 mm piston within a tube simulated water hammer. Adding a 5 mm stationary rod within the tube generated both effects simultaneously. Charged-coupled device (CCD) laser displacement sensors, strobe lighting technique, laser Doppler velocimetry (LDV), particle image velocimetry (PIV) and high fidelity piezoelectric pressure transducers measured impact velocities, cavitation images, squeeze flow velocities, vortices, and pressure changes at impact, respectively. The movable rods created cavitation at critical impact velocities of 1.6 and 1.2 m/s; squeeze flow velocities were 2.8 and 4.64 m/s. The isolated water hammer created cavitation at 1.3 m/s piston speed. The combined piston and stationary rod created cavitation at an impact speed of 0.9 m/s and squeeze flow of 3.2 m/s. These results show squeeze flow alone caused cavitation, notably at lower impact velocity as contact area increased. Water hammer alone also caused cavitation with faster displacement. Both effects together were additive. The pressure change at the vortex center was only 150 mmHg, which cannot generate the magnitude of pressure drop required for cavitation bubble formation. Cavitation occurred at 3-5 m/s squeeze flow, significantly different from the 14 m/s derived by Bernoulli's equation; the temporal acceleration of unsteady flow requires further study.
引用
收藏
页码:3162 / 3172
页数:11
相关论文
共 40 条
[31]  
MANNING KB, 2008, J BIOMECH ENG, V130
[32]   Mean velocity and Reynolds stress measurements in the regurgitant jets of tilting disk heart valves in an artificial heart environment [J].
Maymir, JC ;
Deutsch, S ;
Meyer, RS ;
Geselowitz, DB ;
Tarbell, JM .
ANNALS OF BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING, 1998, 26 (01) :146-156
[33]  
QUIJANO RC, 1988, P CARD STIM 6 INT C
[34]   MECHANISMS OF CAVITATION INCEPTION - REVIEW [J].
ROOD, EP .
JOURNAL OF FLUIDS ENGINEERING-TRANSACTIONS OF THE ASME, 1991, 113 (02) :163-175
[35]  
Shu M C, 1994, J Heart Valve Dis, V3 Suppl 1, pS85
[36]  
TOKUNO T, 1978, THESIS U RICE
[37]  
Walker W., 1974, ASME ADV BIOENGINEER, V1, P148
[38]  
WU ZJ, 1996, THESIS U MIAMI
[39]  
Young F.R., 1989, Cavitation
[40]   Development of squeeze flow in mechanical heart valve: A particle image velocimetry investigation [J].
Zhang, Pei ;
Yeo, Joon Hock ;
Hwang, N. H. C. .
ASAIO JOURNAL, 2006, 52 (04) :391-397