A comparative study of the mutagenicity of various types of tobacco products

被引:33
作者
Rickert, W. S.
Wright, W. G.
Trivedi, A. H.
Momin, R. A.
Lauterbach, J. H.
机构
[1] Lab Int ULC, Kitchener, ON N2C 1L3, Canada
[2] LLC, Lauterbach & Associates, Macon, GA 31210 USA
关键词
Ames; Salmonella typhimurium; bidis; chemistry; chewing; cigarettes; cigars; mutagenicity; smoke; snuff; tobacco;
D O I
10.1016/j.yrtph.2007.05.003
中图分类号
DF [法律]; D9 [法律]; R [医药、卫生];
学科分类号
0301 ; 10 ;
摘要
Toxicological data are an important aspect of tobacco product characterization. In this study, TPM (Total Particulate Matter) (three replicates) was collected from cigarettes [five brands, ISO conditions: puff volume, 35 mL; duration, 2 s; interval, 60 s (35/2/60)], cigars (two brands, 45/2/30), cigarillos (two brands, 35/2/60), bidis (two brands, 45/2/30), and pipe tobacco (two brands, 50/2/12). TPM was extracted from the Cambridge filter pad using dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO). Smokeless tobacco (ST) (six brands) was extracted with DMSO using an ultrasonic homogenizer. Both types of extracts were filtered and stored at -80 degrees C. All extracts were analyzed for humectants, water and nicotine. Mutagenic activity was assessed per OECD guideline 471 using Salmonella typhimurium TA98+S9 and TA100+S9. TA98+S9 response (specific activity expressed as revertants/mg nicotine) was greatest for the cigarette fabricated with dark, air-cured tobaccos. Average product responses with TA98+S9 based on nicotine and relative to cigarettes (excluding dark tobacco) were cigars, 242%; cigarillos, 238%; bidis, 91%; and pipe tobacco, 44%. ST response was not significant for TA98+S9. Corresponding values for TA 100+S9 were cigars, 189%; cigarillos, 155%; pipe tobacco, 130%; bidis, 114% and ST, 34%. ST TA100+S9 response ranged from a low of 501 to a high of 8547 revertants/mg nicotine, depending on ST composition. (c) 2007 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:320 / 330
页数:11
相关论文
共 61 条
  • [1] CONTRIBUTION OF COFFEE AROMA CONSTITUENTS TO THE MUTAGENICITY OF COFFEE
    AESCHBACHER, HU
    WOLLEB, U
    LOLIGER, J
    SPADONE, JC
    LIARDON, R
    [J]. FOOD AND CHEMICAL TOXICOLOGY, 1989, 27 (04) : 227 - 232
  • [2] Anczak John D, 2003, Clin Med Res, V1, P201
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2008, ISO 43872000AMD12008
  • [4] [Anonymous], 1986, NIH PUBLICATION, V96-2874
  • [5] IN VITRO ANTIMICROBIAL ACTIVITY OF DIMETHYLSULFOXIDE
    BASCH, H
    GADEBUSCH, HH
    [J]. APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY, 1968, 16 (12) : 1953 - +
  • [6] European Union policy on smokeless tobacco:: a statement in favour of evidence based regulation for public health
    Bates, C
    Fagerström, K
    Jarvis, MJ
    Kunze, M
    McNeill, A
    Ramström, L
    [J]. TOBACCO CONTROL, 2003, 12 (04) : 360 - 367
  • [7] AN EMPIRICAL-APPROACH TO THE STATISTICAL-ANALYSIS OF MUTAGENESIS DATA FROM THE SALMONELLA TEST
    BERNSTEIN, L
    KALDOR, J
    MCCANN, J
    PIKE, MC
    [J]. MUTATION RESEARCH, 1982, 97 (04): : 267 - 281
  • [8] BILLIMORIA H, 1975, BEITR TABAKFORSCH, V8, P193
  • [9] BROTZGE K, 1984, MICROBIAL EXAMINATIO
  • [10] The effect of tobacco smoke, nicotine, and cotinine on the mutagenicity of 4-(methylnitrosamino)-1-(3-pyridyl)-1-butanol (NNAL)
    Brown, B
    Avalos, J
    Lee, C
    Doolittle, D
    [J]. MUTATION RESEARCH-GENETIC TOXICOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL MUTAGENESIS, 2001, 494 (1-2) : 21 - 29