Development of quality indicators for departments of hospital-based physiotherapy: a modified Delphi study

被引:11
作者
Steenbruggen, Rudi A. [1 ,2 ]
van Oorsouw, Roel [3 ]
Maas, Marjo [1 ,4 ]
Hoogeboom, Thomas J. [1 ]
Brand, Paul [5 ,6 ]
van Der Wees, Philip [1 ]
机构
[1] Radboud Univ Nijmegen, Med Ctr, IQ Healthcare, Radboud Inst Hlth Sci, Nijmegen, Netherlands
[2] Saxion Univ Appl Sci, Sch Hlth, Enschede, Netherlands
[3] Radboudumc, Physiotherapy, Nijmegen, Netherlands
[4] HAN Univ Appl Sci, Inst Allied Hlth Studies, Nijmegen, Netherlands
[5] Isala Hosp, Med Educ, Zwolle, Netherlands
[6] Univ Med Ctr Groningen, Clin Educ, Groningen, Netherlands
关键词
continuous quality improvement; healthcare quality improvement; hospital medicine; quality improvement; standards of care; PHYSICAL-THERAPISTS; SAFETY; RECOMMENDATIONS; GUIDELINES; CHECKLIST; MORTALITY; CONSENSUS; CARE;
D O I
10.1136/bmjoq-2019-000812
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
BackgroundInternational hospital accreditation instruments, such as Joint Commission International (JCI) and Qmentum, focus mainly on hospital policy and procedures and do not specifically cover a profession such as hospital-based physiotherapy. This justifies the need for a quality system to which hospital-based physiotherapy can better identify, based on a common framework of quality indicators for effective quality management.ObjectiveThis study aimed to identify the most important quality indicators of a hospital-based physiotherapy department in the eyes of hospital-based physiotherapists and their managers.MethodsBased on input from three focus groups and a structured literature review, a first set of quality indicators for hospital physiotherapy was assembled. After checking this set for duplicates and for overlap with JCI and Qmentum, it formed the starting point of a modified Delphi procedure. In two rounds, 17 hospital-based physiotherapy experts rated the quality indicators on relevance through online surveys. In a final consensus meeting, quality indicators were established, classified in quality themes and operationalised by describing for each theme the rationale, specifications, domain and type of indicator.ResultsThree focus groups provided 120 potential indicators, which were complemented with 18 potential indicators based on literature. After duplicate and overlap check and the Delphi procedure, these 138 potential indicators were reduced to a set of 56 quality indicators for hospital-based physiotherapy. Finally, these 56 indicators were condensed into 7 composite indicators, each representing a quality theme based on definitions of the European Foundation for Quality Management.ConclusionA set of 56 quality indicators, condensed into 7 composite indicators each representing a quality theme, was developed to assess the quality of a hospital-based physiotherapy department.
引用
收藏
页数:7
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]   An International Environmental Scan of Quality Indicators for Cardiovascular Care [J].
Abrahamyan, Lusine ;
Boom, Nicole ;
Donovan, Linda R. ;
Tu, Jack V. .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF CARDIOLOGY, 2012, 28 (01) :110-118
[2]  
Adamson B J, 2000, J Allied Health, V29, P203
[3]   Nature and operation of attitudes [J].
Ajzen, I .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF PSYCHOLOGY, 2001, 52 :27-58
[4]   Developing the theory of formative assessment [J].
Black, Paul ;
Wiliam, Dylan .
EDUCATIONAL ASSESSMENT EVALUATION AND ACCOUNTABILITY, 2009, 21 (01) :5-31
[5]   Using and Reporting the Delphi Method for Selecting Healthcare Quality Indicators: A Systematic Review [J].
Boulkedid, Rym ;
Abdoul, Hendy ;
Loustau, Marine ;
Sibony, Olivier ;
Alberti, Corinne .
PLOS ONE, 2011, 6 (06)
[6]  
Braithwaite Jeffrey, 2005, J Health Serv Res Policy, V10, P10
[7]   Pediatric Quality and Safety: A Nursing Perspective [J].
Butler, Gabriella A. ;
Hupp, Diane S. .
PEDIATRIC CLINICS OF NORTH AMERICA, 2016, 63 (02) :329-+
[8]  
Butterfield R., 2012, Quality of NHS Care and External Pathway Peer Review Report No. 3
[9]   Quality indicators for general practice: which ones can general practitioners and health authority managers agree are important and how useful are they? [J].
Campbell, SM ;
Roland, MO ;
Quayle, JA ;
Buetow, SA ;
Shekelle, PG .
JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH MEDICINE, 1998, 20 (04) :414-421
[10]   Use of quality indicators by obstetric caregivers in the Netherlands: A descriptive study [J].
Cellissen, Evelien ;
Franx, Arie ;
Roes, Kit C. B. .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY AND REPRODUCTIVE BIOLOGY, 2017, 211 :177-181