Will a second biopsy sample affect treatment decisions in patients with chronic hepatitis B?

被引:3
作者
Ekiz, Fuat [1 ]
Yuksel, Ilhami [2 ]
Arikok, Ata Turker [3 ]
Yilmaz, Baris [4 ]
Altinbas, Akif [5 ]
Aktas, Bora [6 ]
Deveci, Murat [7 ]
Basar, Omer [8 ]
Coban, Sahin [9 ]
Yuksel, Osman [8 ]
机构
[1] Hatay Antakya State Hosp, Dept Gastroenterol, Saraykent Mh 20 Sk, Antakya, Hatay, Turkey
[2] Yildirim Beyazit Univ, Sch Med, Dept Gastroenterol, Ankara, Turkey
[3] Diskapi Yildirim Beyazit Educ & Res Hosp, Dept Pathol, Ankara, Turkey
[4] Osmaniye State Hosp, Dept Gastroenterol, Osmaniye, Turkey
[5] Ankara Numune Training & Res Hosp, Dept Gastroenterol, Ankara, Turkey
[6] Ankara Kecioren Educ & Res Hosp, Dept Gastroenterol, Ankara, Turkey
[7] Yozgat State Hosp, Dept Gastroenterol, Yozgat, Turkey
[8] Hacettepe Univ, Sch Med, Dept Gastroenterol, Ankara, Turkey
[9] Diskapi Yildirim Beyazit Educ & Res Hosp, Dept Gastroenterol, Ankara, Turkey
关键词
Chronic hepatitis B; Sample variability; Liver biopsy; CHRONIC VIRAL-HEPATITIS; LIVER-BIOPSY; NEEDLE-BIOPSY; VARIABILITY; DISEASE; SIZE; INFECTION; SPECIMENS; FIBROSIS;
D O I
10.1007/s12072-015-9666-5
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Liver biopsy is the gold standard for assessment of fibrosis in patients with hepatitis B. However, it has some disadvantages, including inter-observer and intra-observer variability in biopsy interpretation and specimen variation. A standard biopsy specimen represents only about 0.0002 % of the whole liver. It has been shown that two biopsy samples collected during a procedure have significant influence on the diagnostic performance of interpretation in patients with hepatitis C or non-alcoholic steatohepatitis. Therefore, we aimed to assess the influence of collecting two liver biopsy samples during a single procedure for staging and grading chronic hepatitis B. 27 patients were included in the study. The median age of the patients was 43.51 +/- 11.69. Fifteen patients were female, 12 patients were male. In the biopsy procedure, two samples of liver lobes were obtained. Grade and stage scores were compared between the two samples. Fibrosis staging and grading were assessed according to the Ishak scoring system. Numbers of portal tract and biopsy size were equal in the two samples. There was a significant difference between the samples in terms of histological activity index (p value = 0.04). However, the difference was not enough to distinguish the mild and moderate stages. On the other hand, no significant difference in fibrosis staging between the two samples was found. With this relatively small size of patients, in this study, we showed that a proper liver biopsy size is sufficient to predict treatment decisions in chronic hepatitis B patients. However, further studies are needed to show the association of sampling variability in patients with hepatitis B.
引用
收藏
页码:602 / 605
页数:4
相关论文
共 20 条
  • [1] SAMPLING VARIABILITY ON PERCUTANEOUS LIVER-BIOPSY
    ABDI, W
    MILLAN, JC
    MEZEY, E
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1979, 139 (06) : 667 - 669
  • [2] Evaluation of liver fibrosis: A concise review
    Afdhal, NH
    Nunes, D
    [J]. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2004, 99 (06) : 1160 - 1174
  • [3] BAUNSGAARD P, 1979, ACTA PATH MICRO IM A, V87, P51
  • [4] Sampling variability of liver fibrosis in chronic hepatitis C
    Bedossa, P
    Dargère, D
    Paradis, V
    [J]. HEPATOLOGY, 2003, 38 (06) : 1449 - 1457
  • [5] Current concepts: Liver biopsy.
    Bravo, AA
    Sheth, SG
    Chopra, S
    [J]. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2001, 344 (07) : 495 - 500
  • [6] Practices of liver biopsy in France: Results of a prospective nationwide survey
    Cadranel, JF
    Rufat, P
    Degos, F
    [J]. HEPATOLOGY, 2000, 32 (03) : 477 - 481
  • [7] Impact of liver biopsy size on histological evaluation of chronic viral hepatitis: the smaller the sample, the milder the disease
    Colloredo, G
    Guido, M
    Sonzogni, A
    Leandro, G
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HEPATOLOGY, 2003, 39 (02) : 239 - 244
  • [8] EASL International Concensus Conference on Hepatitis B -: 13-14 September, 2002 Geneva, Switzerland Consensus Statement (Long version)
    de Franchis, R
    Hadengue, A
    Lau, G
    Lavanchy, D
    Lok, A
    McIntyre, N
    Mele, A
    Paumgartner, G
    Pietrangelo, A
    Rodés, J
    Rosenberg, W
    Valla, D
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HEPATOLOGY, 2003, 39 : S3 - S25
  • [9] Pathologist's perspective on liver needle biopsy size?
    Demetris, AJ
    Ruppert, K
    [J]. JOURNAL OF HEPATOLOGY, 2003, 39 (02) : 275 - 277
  • [10] LABAYLE D, 1979, GASTROEN CLIN BIOL, V3, P235