Comparison of Substances Used for Prevention of Intra-Abdominal Adhesions: An Experimental Study in Rats

被引：5
作者：
Gunaydin, Mithat [1 ]
Guvenc, Dilek [4 ]
Yildiz, Levent [2 ]
Aksoy, Abdurrahman [4 ]
Tander, Burak [1 ]
Blcakci, Unal [1 ]
Ayyildiz, H. Suat [1 ]
Sunter, A. Tevfik [3 ]
Ariturk, Ender [1 ]
Rizalar, Riza [1 ]
Bernay, Ferit [1 ]
机构：
[1] Ondokuz Mayis Univ, Tip Fak, Cocuk Cerrahisi AD, Samsun, Turkey
[2] Ondokuz Mayis Univ, Tip Fak, Patol AD, Samsun, Turkey
[3] Ondokuz Mayis Univ, Tip Fak, Halk Sagligi AD, Samsun, Turkey
[4] Ondokuz Mayis Univ, Vet Fak, Farmakol & Toksikol AD, Samsun, Turkey
来源：
TURKIYE KLINIKLERI TIP BILIMLERI DERGISI | 2012年 / 32卷 / 02期
关键词：
Abdominal cavity; abdominal pain; tissue adhesions; UTERINE HORN MODEL; INTRAPERITONEAL ADHESIONS; POSTOPERATIVE ADHESIONS; GYNECOLOGICAL SURGERY; MITOMYCIN-C; REDUCTION; GEL; BARRIERS; LIQUID;
D O I：
10.5336/medsci.2011-22902
中图分类号：
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号：
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要：
Objective: Many substances have been used up to date in order to prevent postoperative adhesions. This problem is still a 'puzzle' for researchers. We aimed to compare various substances preventing adhesions in an experimental postoperative adhesion model. Material and Methods: A total of 35 female Sprague-Dawley rats were divided into five groups containing equal number of animals. After laparatomy, peritoneum and ceacum were brushed using a tooth brush until punctate hemorrhage was seen. Additional surgery was not applied in control group (group 1). In the other groups, polyethylene dioxide+sodium carboxymethyl cellulose (PEO+CMC) (group 2), hyaluronan. (HA) (group 3), octenidine dihydrochloride+fenoxyethanol 2% (ODH+FE) (group 4) and surfactant. (SFT) (group 5) were applied respectively, in order to prevent intra-abdominal adhesions. Rats were sacrificed on 10(th) day. Adhesion scores, fibroblastic activity and periserosal inflammation were determined and hydroxyproline (HP) levels were measured using HPLC method. Results: Adhesion and fibroblastic activity scores of group 1 (control) were found significantly higher than the other groups (except ODH+FE group). The lowest adhesion score and hydroxyproline level were found in PEO+CMC group (p<0.05). The lowest fibroblastic acitvity and periserosal inflammation were found in SET group, and it was significantly different from group 1. Periserosal inflammation was significantly higher in ODH group compared to the other groups (p<0.05). Adhesion score of PEO+CMC group was significantly lower than the other groups. Conclusion: All these substances have anti-adhesive effects to some extent. ODH+FE causes irritation to intestinal serosa and has mild anti-adhesive effect. SET was the least irritative among all the substances tested. PEO+CMC seems to be the strongest anti-adhesive substance. This study supports the positive reports on the clinical use of PME+CMS and HA. Particularly, SFT is found to be effective against intra-abdominal adhesions. However, ODH+FE should be further investigated in diluted concentrations.
引用
收藏
页码：337 / 345
页数：9
相关论文
共 37 条
  • [1] Aka N, 2001, TURKIYE KLIN J GYNEC, V11, P262
  • [2] Akdeniz Y, 2007, ULUS TRAVMA ACIL CER, V13, P94
  • [3] ARRAJAB A, 1995, EUR J SURG, V161, P341
  • [4] Ayten R, 2010, FIRAT U MED J HLTH S, V24, P31
  • [5] Bediz CS, 1998, GENEL TIP DERG, V8, P165
  • [6] UNIFYING PATHOGENETIC MECHANISM IN ETIOLOGY OF INTRAPERITONEAL ADHESIONS
    BUCKMAN, RF
    WOODS, M
    SARGENT, L
    GERVIN, AS
    [J]. JOURNAL OF SURGICAL RESEARCH, 1976, 20 (01) : 1 - 5
  • [7] Canturk NZ, 2000, TURKISH J TRAUMA EME, V6, P155
  • [8] Carta G, 2004, Clin Exp Obstet Gynecol, V31, P39
  • [9] A role for specific collagen motifs during wound healing and inflammatory response of fibroblasts in the teleost fish gilthead seabream
    Castillo-Briceno, Patricia
    Bihan, Dominique
    Nilges, Michael
    Hamaia, Samir
    Meseguer, Jose
    Garcia-Ayala, Alfonsa
    Farndale, Richard W.
    Mulero, Victoriano
    [J]. MOLECULAR IMMUNOLOGY, 2011, 48 (6-7) : 826 - 834
  • [10] Mitomycin-C prevents reformation of intra-abdominal adhesions after adhesiolysis
    Çubukçu, A
    Alponat, A
    Gönüllü, NN
    [J]. SURGERY, 2002, 131 (01) : 81 - 84
1234