Street-level Politics: Labour Protests in Post-authoritarian Indonesia

被引:18
作者
Juliawan, Benny Hari [1 ]
机构
[1] Sanata Dharma Univ, Grad Sch Culture & Relig, Yogyakarta 55002, Indonesia
关键词
Labour politics; post-authoritarianism; Indonesia; street protests; movement society; REFORM;
D O I
10.1080/00472336.2011.582706
中图分类号
K9 [地理];
学科分类号
0705 ;
摘要
Over the past ten years, Indonesia has seen an interesting trend in political action on the part of labour. Once risky activity, street protests have been decriminalised and become a common sight in many parts of the country, especially in urban areas. Industrial workers take to the streets in large numbers to challenge the state and business interests perceived as hostile to their material and political interests. Interestingly, scholars have largely neglected this phenomenon and instead focused on labour's failure to develop as a meaningful political force. This paper assesses the significance of labour protests and the light they throw on the development of a certain mode of engagement with the post-authoritarian state. It is suggested that the proliferation of protests among workers may sow the seeds of a "movement society."
引用
收藏
页码:349 / 370
页数:22
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 19 C ASS IND REL AC
[2]  
[Anonymous], IND RELATIONS J
[3]  
Asia Watch on Labor Rights, 1993, IND CHARG REB LAB RI
[4]  
Aspinall E., 1995, Indonesia, P21
[5]  
Barron Patrick., 2004, LOCAL CONFLICT INDON
[6]   The rise and fall of social partnership in postsocialist Europe: the Commonwealth of Independent States [J].
Borisov, Vadim ;
Clarke, Simon .
INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS JOURNAL, 2006, 37 (06) :607-629
[7]  
Bresnan J., 1993, MANAGING INDONESIA M
[8]   Labour politics and democratic transition in South Korea and Taiwan [J].
Buchanan, PG ;
Nicholls, K .
GOVERNMENT AND OPPOSITION, 2003, 38 (02) :203-237
[9]  
Budiman Arief., 2001, Aktor Demokrasi: Catatan Tentang Gerakan Perlawanan di Indonesia
[10]   Freedom of association: Battering ram or Trojan horse? [J].
Caraway, Teri L. .
REVIEW OF INTERNATIONAL POLITICAL ECONOMY, 2006, 13 (02) :210-232