Randomized clinical trial of oral and intravenous versus intravenous antibiotic prophylaxis for laparoscopic colorectal resection

被引:52
|
作者
Ikeda, A. [1 ]
Konishi, T. [1 ]
Ueno, M. [1 ]
Fukunaga, Y. [1 ]
Nagayama, S. [1 ]
Fujimoto, Y. [1 ]
Akiyoshi, T. [1 ]
Yamaguchi, T. [1 ]
机构
[1] Japanese Fdn Canc Res, Canc Inst Hosp, Dept Surg Gastroenterol, 3-8-31 Ariake Koto Ku, Tokyo 1358550, Japan
关键词
SURGICAL-SITE INFECTION; PERIOPERATIVE SELECTIVE DECONTAMINATION; ANTIMICROBIAL PROPHYLAXIS; DIGESTIVE-TRACT; METAANALYSIS; PREVENTION; SURGERY;
D O I
10.1002/bjs.10281
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The use of oral prophylactic antibiotics for the prevention of surgical-site infection (SSI) in patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer is controversial. The aim of this RCT was to evaluate whether intravenous perioperative antibiotics are inferior to combined preoperative oral and perioperative intravenous antibiotics in this setting. Methods: Patients undergoing elective laparoscopic colorectal resection in a single cancer centre were assigned randomly to combined preoperative oral antibiotics (metronidazole and kanamycin) and perioperative intravenous antibiotics (cefmetazole) (oral/IV group) or to perioperative intravenous antibiotics (cefmetazole) alone (IV-only group). Patients were stratified for the analyses based on type of operation (colonic surgery, anterior resection or abdominoperineal resection), preoperative use of mechanical bowel preparation, preoperative chemoradiotherapy and the presence of diabetes mellitus. The primary endpoint was the overall rate of SSI. Secondary endpoints were the rates of incisional site infection, organ/space infection, anastomotic leakage, intra-abdominal abscess, adverse events and postoperative complications. Results: Of 540 patients offered participation in the trial in 2013-2014, 515 agreed to take part and were randomized. Some 256 patients in the IV-only group and 255 in the oral/IV group completed the treatment per protocol. The overall rate of SSI was 7.8 per cent (20 of 256) in the IV-only group and 7.8 per cent (20 of 255) in the oral/IV group, confirming that perioperative administration of intravenous antibiotics alone was not inferior to the combined regimen (P = 0.017). There were no differences in rates of incisional site infection (5.5 versus 5.9 per cent respectively), organ/space infection (2.3 versus 2.0 per cent) or other secondary endpoints between the two groups. Conclusion: Intravenous perioperative antimicrobial prophylaxis alone is not inferior to combined preoperative oral and intravenous perioperative prophylaxis with regard to SSI in patients with colorectal cancer undergoing elective laparoscopic resection. Registration number: UMIN000019339 (http://www.umin.ac.jp/ctr/).
引用
收藏
页码:1608 / 1615
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [11] Oral and Parenteral Versus Parenteral Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Elective Laparoscopic Colorectal Surgery (JMTO PREV 07-01) A Phase 3, Multicenter, Open-label, Randomized Trial
    Hata, Hiroaki
    Yamaguchi, Takashi
    Hasegawa, Suguru
    Nomura, Akinari
    Hida, Koya
    Nishitai, Ryuta
    Yamanokuchi, Satoshi
    Yamanaka, Takeharu
    Sakai, Yoshiharu
    ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2016, 263 (06) : 1085 - 1091
  • [12] Evaluation of postoperative antibiotic prophylaxis after liver resection: a randomized controlled trial
    Hirokawa, Fumitoshi
    Hayashi, Michihiro
    Miyamoto, Yoshiharu
    Asakuma, Mitsuhiro
    Shimizu, Tetsunosuke
    Komeda, Koji
    Inoue, Yoshihiro
    Uchiyama, Kazuhisa
    Nishimura, Yasuichiro
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2013, 206 (01) : 8 - 15
  • [13] Randomized trial of oral versus intravenous acetaminophen for postoperative pain control
    Hickman, Skip R.
    Mathieson, Kathleen M.
    Bradford, Lynne M.
    Garman, Casey D.
    Gregg, Richard W.
    Lukens, Douglas W.
    AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HEALTH-SYSTEM PHARMACY, 2018, 75 (06) : 367 - 375
  • [14] Antibiotic prophylaxis in colorectal surgery: are oral, intravenous or both best and is mechanical bowel preparation necessary?
    R. L. Nelson
    M. Hassan
    M. D. Grant
    Techniques in Coloproctology, 2020, 24 : 1233 - 1246
  • [15] Oral and Parenteral vs. Parenteral Antibiotic Prophylaxis for Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Colorectal Resection: An Intervention Review with Meta-Analysis
    Sangiorgio, Giuseppe
    Vacante, Marco
    Basile, Francesco
    Biondi, Antonio
    ANTIBIOTICS-BASEL, 2022, 11 (01):
  • [16] Randomized clinical trial of chewing gum after laparoscopic colorectal resection
    Shum, N. F.
    Choi, H. K.
    Mak, J. C. K.
    Foo, D. C. C.
    Li, W. C.
    Law, W. L.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2016, 103 (11) : 1447 - 1452
  • [17] Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy: A Randomized Controlled Trial
    Matsui, Yoichi
    Satoi, Sohei
    Kaibori, Masaki
    Toyokawa, Hideyoshi
    Yanagimoto, Hiroaki
    Matsui, Kosuke
    Ishizaki, Morihiko
    Kwon, A-Hon
    PLOS ONE, 2014, 9 (09):
  • [18] Oral Antibiotic Prophylaxis Reduces Surgical Site Infection and Anastomotic Leakage in Patients Undergoing Colorectal Cancer Surgery
    Grewal, Simran
    Reuvers, J. Reinder D.
    Abis, Gabor S. A.
    Otten, Rene H. J.
    Kazemier, Geert
    Stockmann, Hein B. A. C.
    van Egmond, Marjolein
    Oosterling, Steven J.
    BIOMEDICINES, 2021, 9 (09)
  • [19] Are postoperative intravenous fluids in patients undergoing elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy a necessity? A randomized clinical trial
    Henriques, Jessimara Ribeiro
    Toulson Davisson Correia, Maria Isabel
    SURGERY, 2018, 163 (04) : 721 - 725
  • [20] Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic versus open left colonic resection
    Braga, M.
    Frasson, M.
    Zuliani, W.
    Vignali, A.
    Pecorelli, N.
    Di Carlo, V.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2010, 97 (08) : 1180 - 1186