Randomized clinical trial of oral and intravenous versus intravenous antibiotic prophylaxis for laparoscopic colorectal resection

被引:52
|
作者
Ikeda, A. [1 ]
Konishi, T. [1 ]
Ueno, M. [1 ]
Fukunaga, Y. [1 ]
Nagayama, S. [1 ]
Fujimoto, Y. [1 ]
Akiyoshi, T. [1 ]
Yamaguchi, T. [1 ]
机构
[1] Japanese Fdn Canc Res, Canc Inst Hosp, Dept Surg Gastroenterol, 3-8-31 Ariake Koto Ku, Tokyo 1358550, Japan
关键词
SURGICAL-SITE INFECTION; PERIOPERATIVE SELECTIVE DECONTAMINATION; ANTIMICROBIAL PROPHYLAXIS; DIGESTIVE-TRACT; METAANALYSIS; PREVENTION; SURGERY;
D O I
10.1002/bjs.10281
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: The use of oral prophylactic antibiotics for the prevention of surgical-site infection (SSI) in patients undergoing laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer is controversial. The aim of this RCT was to evaluate whether intravenous perioperative antibiotics are inferior to combined preoperative oral and perioperative intravenous antibiotics in this setting. Methods: Patients undergoing elective laparoscopic colorectal resection in a single cancer centre were assigned randomly to combined preoperative oral antibiotics (metronidazole and kanamycin) and perioperative intravenous antibiotics (cefmetazole) (oral/IV group) or to perioperative intravenous antibiotics (cefmetazole) alone (IV-only group). Patients were stratified for the analyses based on type of operation (colonic surgery, anterior resection or abdominoperineal resection), preoperative use of mechanical bowel preparation, preoperative chemoradiotherapy and the presence of diabetes mellitus. The primary endpoint was the overall rate of SSI. Secondary endpoints were the rates of incisional site infection, organ/space infection, anastomotic leakage, intra-abdominal abscess, adverse events and postoperative complications. Results: Of 540 patients offered participation in the trial in 2013-2014, 515 agreed to take part and were randomized. Some 256 patients in the IV-only group and 255 in the oral/IV group completed the treatment per protocol. The overall rate of SSI was 7.8 per cent (20 of 256) in the IV-only group and 7.8 per cent (20 of 255) in the oral/IV group, confirming that perioperative administration of intravenous antibiotics alone was not inferior to the combined regimen (P = 0.017). There were no differences in rates of incisional site infection (5.5 versus 5.9 per cent respectively), organ/space infection (2.3 versus 2.0 per cent) or other secondary endpoints between the two groups. Conclusion: Intravenous perioperative antimicrobial prophylaxis alone is not inferior to combined preoperative oral and intravenous perioperative prophylaxis with regard to SSI in patients with colorectal cancer undergoing elective laparoscopic resection. Registration number: UMIN000019339 (http://www.umin.ac.jp/ctr/).
引用
收藏
页码:1608 / 1615
页数:8
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [1] Intravenous Versus Oral Antibiotic Prophylaxis Efficacy for Elective Laparoscopic Cholecystectomies: a Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial
    Karaca, A. Serdar
    Gundogdu, Haldun
    Ozdogan, Mehmet
    Ersoy, Eren
    INDIAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2015, 77 : S640 - S644
  • [2] Intravenous Versus Oral Antibiotic Prophylaxis Efficacy for Elective Laparoscopic Cholecystectomies: a Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial
    A. Serdar Karaca
    Haldun Gündoğdu
    Mehmet Özdoğan
    Eren Ersoy
    Indian Journal of Surgery, 2015, 77 : 640 - 644
  • [3] Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Intravenous Antimicrobial Prophylaxis Alone with Oral and Intravenous Antimicrobial Prophylaxis for the Prevention of a Surgical Site Infection in Colorectal Cancer Surgery
    Minako Kobayashi
    Yasuhiko Mohri
    Hitoshi Tonouchi
    Chikao Miki
    Keiji Nakai
    Masato Kusunoki
    Surgery Today, 2007, 37 : 383 - 388
  • [4] Randomized clinical trial comparing intravenous antimicrobial prophylaxis alone with oral and intravenous antimicrobial prophylaxis for the prevention of a surgical site infection in colorectal cancer surgery
    Kobayashi, Minako
    Mohri, Yasuhiko
    Tonouchi, Hitoshi
    Miki, Chikao
    Nakai, Keiji
    Kusunoki, Masato
    SURGERY TODAY, 2007, 37 (05) : 383 - 388
  • [5] Randomized clinical trial of preoperative oral versus intravenous iron in anaemic patients with colorectal cancer
    Keeler, B. D.
    Simpson, J. A.
    Ng, O.
    Padmanabhan, H.
    Brookes, M. J.
    Acheson, A. G.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2017, 104 (03) : 214 - 221
  • [6] Antibiotic prophylaxis in colorectal surgery: are oral, intravenous or both best and is mechanical bowel preparation necessary?
    Nelson, R. L.
    Hassan, M.
    Grant, M. D.
    TECHNIQUES IN COLOPROCTOLOGY, 2020, 24 (12) : 1233 - 1246
  • [7] Systemic versus Oral and Systemic Antibiotic Prophylaxis (SOAP) study in colorectal surgery: prospective randomized multicentre trial
    Papp, G.
    Saftics, Gy
    Szabo, B. E.
    Baracs, J.
    Vereczkei, A.
    Kollar, D.
    Olah, A.
    Meszaros, P.
    Duboczki, Zs
    Bursics, A.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2021, 108 (03) : 271 - 276
  • [8] Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic ultrasonography before laparoscopic colorectal cancer resection
    Ellebaek, S. B.
    Fristrup, C. W.
    Hovendal, C.
    Qvist, N.
    Bundgaard, L.
    Salomon, S.
    Stovring, J.
    Mortensen, M. B.
    BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 2017, 104 (11) : 1462 - 1469
  • [9] Pharmacodynamic modelling of intravenous antibiotic prophylaxis in elective colorectal surgery
    Moine, P.
    Fish, D. N.
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS, 2013, 41 (02) : 167 - 173
  • [10] Choice of Intravenous Antibiotic Prophylaxis for Colorectal Surgery Does Matter
    Deierhoi, Rhiannon J.
    Dawes, Lillian G.
    Vick, Catherine
    Itani, Kamal M. F.
    Hawn, Mary T.
    JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 2013, 217 (05) : 763 - 769