Definitions, measurements and prevalence of fear of childbirth: a systematic review

被引:244
作者
Nilsson, C. [1 ,2 ]
Hessman, E. [3 ]
Sjoblom, H. [3 ]
Dencker, A. [2 ]
Jangsten, E. [2 ]
Mollberg, M. [2 ]
Patel, H. [2 ]
Sparud-Lundin, C. [2 ]
Wigert, H. [2 ]
Begley, C. [2 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Boras, Fac Caring Sci Work Life & Social Welf, S-50190 Boras, Sweden
[2] Univ Gothenburg, Sahlgrenska Acad, Inst Hlth & Care Sci, Box 457, SE-40530 Gothenburg, Sweden
[3] Univ Gothenburg, Gothenburg Univ Lib, Biomed Lib, Box 416, SE-40530 Gothenburg, Sweden
[4] Trinity Coll Dublin, Sch Nursing & Midwifery, Chair Nursing & Midwifery, 24 DOlier St, Dublin 2, Ireland
来源
BMC PREGNANCY AND CHILDBIRTH | 2018年 / 18卷
关键词
Fear of childbirth; Systematic review; Prevalence; W-DEQ; FOBS; Request for caesarean section; EMERGENCY CESAREAN-SECTION; NATIONAL BIRTH COHORT; 6 EUROPEAN COUNTRIES; PREGNANT-WOMEN; NULLIPAROUS WOMEN; SWEDISH WOMEN; SELF-EFFICACY; OBSTETRIC INTERVENTIONS; ANTENATAL EDUCATION; MATERNAL REQUEST;
D O I
10.1186/s12884-018-1659-7
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Background: Fear of Childbirth (FOC) is a common problem affecting women's health and wellbeing, and a common reason for requesting caesarean section. The aims of this review were to summarise published research on prevalence of FOC in childbearing women and how it is defined and measured during pregnancy and postpartum, and to search for useful measures of FOC, for research as well as for clinical settings. Methods: Five bibliographic databases in March 2015 were searched for published research on FOC, using a protocol agreed a priori. The quality of selected studies was assessed independently by pairs of authors. Prevalence data, definitions and methods of measurement were extracted independently from each included study by pairs of authors. Finally, some of the country rates were combined and compared. Results: In total, 12,188 citations were identified and screened by title and abstract; 11,698 were excluded and full-text of 490 assessed for analysis. Of these, 466 were excluded leaving 24 papers included in the review, presenting prevalence of FOC from nine countries in Europe, Australia, Canada and the United States. Various definitions and measurements of FOC were used. The most frequently-used scale was the W-DEQ with various cut-off points describing moderate, severe/intense and extreme/phobic fear. Different 3-, 4-, and 5/6 point scales and visual analogue scales were also used. Country rates (as measured by seven studies using W-DEQ with >= 85 cut-off point) varied from 6.3 to 14.8%, a significant difference (chi-square = 104.44, d.f. = 6, rho < 0.0001). Conclusions: Rates of severe FOC, measured in the same way, varied in different countries. Reasons why FOC might differ are unknown, and further research is necessary. Future studies on FOC should use the W-DEQ tool with a cut-off point of >= 85, or a more thoroughly tested version of the FOBS scale, or a three-point scale measurement of FOC using a single question as 'Are you afraid about the birth?' In this way, valid comparisons in research can be made. Moreover, validation of a clinical tool that is more focussed on FOC alone, and easier than the longer W-DEQ, for women to fill in and clinicians to administer, is required.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 96 条
  • [81] Traumatic stress in late pregnancy
    Söderquist, J
    Wijma, K
    Wijma, B
    [J]. JOURNAL OF ANXIETY DISORDERS, 2004, 18 (02) : 127 - 142
  • [82] Changed indications for cesarean sections
    Stjernholm, Ylva Vladic
    Petersson, Karin
    Eneroth, Eva
    [J]. ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2010, 89 (01) : 49 - 53
  • [83] Why are young Canadians afraid of birth? A survey study of childbirth fear and birth preferences among Canadian University students
    Stoll, Kathrin
    Hall, Wendy
    Janssen, Patricia
    Carty, Elaine
    [J]. MIDWIFERY, 2014, 30 (02) : 220 - 226
  • [84] Childbirth Education and Obstetric Interventions Among Low-Risk Canadian Women: Is There a Connection?
    Stoll, Kathrin
    Hall, Wendy
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PERINATAL EDUCATION, 2012, 21 (04) : 229 - 237
  • [85] Fear of childbirth and elective caesarean section: a population-based study
    Storksen, Hege Therese
    Garthus-Niegel, Susan
    Adams, Samantha S.
    Vangen, Siri
    Eberhard-Gran, Malin
    [J]. BMC PREGNANCY AND CHILDBIRTH, 2015, 15
  • [86] Elective Caesarean section on maternal request in Germany: factors affecting decision making concerning mode of delivery
    Stuetzer, Paul Philipp
    Berlit, Sebastian
    Lis, Stefanie
    Schmahl, Christian
    Suetterlin, Marc
    Tuschy, Benjamin
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS, 2017, 295 (05) : 1151 - 1156
  • [87] Secondary fear of childbirth prolongs the time to subsequent delivery
    Sydsjo, Gunilla
    Angerbjorn, Louise
    Palmquist, Sofie
    Bladh, Marie
    Sydsjo, Adam
    Josefsson, Ann
    [J]. ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2013, 92 (02) : 210 - 214
  • [88] Antenatal fear of childbirth and sense of coherence among healthy pregnant women in Japan: A cross-sectional study
    Takegata, Mizuki
    Haruna, Megumi
    Matsuzaki, Masayo
    Shiraishi, Mie
    Okano, Tadaharu
    Severinsson, Elisabeth
    [J]. ARCHIVES OF WOMENS MENTAL HEALTH, 2014, 17 (05) : 403 - 409
  • [89] Higher prevalence of childbirth related fear in foreign born pregnant women - Findings from a community sample in Sweden
    Ternstrom, Elin
    Hildingsson, Ingegerd
    Haines, Helen
    Rubertsson, Christine
    [J]. MIDWIFERY, 2015, 31 (04) : 445 - 450
  • [90] Negative impressions of childbirth in a North-West England student population
    Thomson, Gill
    Stoll, Kathrin
    Downe, Soo
    Hall, Wendy A.
    [J]. JOURNAL OF PSYCHOSOMATIC OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2017, 38 (01) : 37 - 44