Definitions, measurements and prevalence of fear of childbirth: a systematic review

被引:244
作者
Nilsson, C. [1 ,2 ]
Hessman, E. [3 ]
Sjoblom, H. [3 ]
Dencker, A. [2 ]
Jangsten, E. [2 ]
Mollberg, M. [2 ]
Patel, H. [2 ]
Sparud-Lundin, C. [2 ]
Wigert, H. [2 ]
Begley, C. [2 ,4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Boras, Fac Caring Sci Work Life & Social Welf, S-50190 Boras, Sweden
[2] Univ Gothenburg, Sahlgrenska Acad, Inst Hlth & Care Sci, Box 457, SE-40530 Gothenburg, Sweden
[3] Univ Gothenburg, Gothenburg Univ Lib, Biomed Lib, Box 416, SE-40530 Gothenburg, Sweden
[4] Trinity Coll Dublin, Sch Nursing & Midwifery, Chair Nursing & Midwifery, 24 DOlier St, Dublin 2, Ireland
来源
BMC PREGNANCY AND CHILDBIRTH | 2018年 / 18卷
关键词
Fear of childbirth; Systematic review; Prevalence; W-DEQ; FOBS; Request for caesarean section; EMERGENCY CESAREAN-SECTION; NATIONAL BIRTH COHORT; 6 EUROPEAN COUNTRIES; PREGNANT-WOMEN; NULLIPAROUS WOMEN; SWEDISH WOMEN; SELF-EFFICACY; OBSTETRIC INTERVENTIONS; ANTENATAL EDUCATION; MATERNAL REQUEST;
D O I
10.1186/s12884-018-1659-7
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 ;
摘要
Background: Fear of Childbirth (FOC) is a common problem affecting women's health and wellbeing, and a common reason for requesting caesarean section. The aims of this review were to summarise published research on prevalence of FOC in childbearing women and how it is defined and measured during pregnancy and postpartum, and to search for useful measures of FOC, for research as well as for clinical settings. Methods: Five bibliographic databases in March 2015 were searched for published research on FOC, using a protocol agreed a priori. The quality of selected studies was assessed independently by pairs of authors. Prevalence data, definitions and methods of measurement were extracted independently from each included study by pairs of authors. Finally, some of the country rates were combined and compared. Results: In total, 12,188 citations were identified and screened by title and abstract; 11,698 were excluded and full-text of 490 assessed for analysis. Of these, 466 were excluded leaving 24 papers included in the review, presenting prevalence of FOC from nine countries in Europe, Australia, Canada and the United States. Various definitions and measurements of FOC were used. The most frequently-used scale was the W-DEQ with various cut-off points describing moderate, severe/intense and extreme/phobic fear. Different 3-, 4-, and 5/6 point scales and visual analogue scales were also used. Country rates (as measured by seven studies using W-DEQ with >= 85 cut-off point) varied from 6.3 to 14.8%, a significant difference (chi-square = 104.44, d.f. = 6, rho < 0.0001). Conclusions: Rates of severe FOC, measured in the same way, varied in different countries. Reasons why FOC might differ are unknown, and further research is necessary. Future studies on FOC should use the W-DEQ tool with a cut-off point of >= 85, or a more thoroughly tested version of the FOBS scale, or a three-point scale measurement of FOC using a single question as 'Are you afraid about the birth?' In this way, valid comparisons in research can be made. Moreover, validation of a clinical tool that is more focussed on FOC alone, and easier than the longer W-DEQ, for women to fill in and clinicians to administer, is required.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 96 条
  • [1] Fear of childbirth and duration of labour: a study of 2206 women with intended vaginal delivery
    Adams, S. S.
    Eberhard-Gran, M.
    Eskild, A.
    [J]. BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2012, 119 (10) : 1238 - 1246
  • [2] Fear of childbirth before, during, and after childbirth
    Alehagen, S
    Wijma, B
    Wijma, K
    [J]. ACTA OBSTETRICIA ET GYNECOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 2006, 85 (01) : 56 - 62
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2013, EUR PER HLTH REP HLT
  • [4] [Anonymous], RADSLA INFOR FORLOSS
  • [5] [Anonymous], 1858, Traite de la folie des femmes enceintes, des nouvelles accouchees et des nourrices, et considerations medico-legales qui se rattachent a ce sujet
  • [6] FEAR OF CHILDBIRTH IN LATE PREGNANCY
    ARESKOG, B
    UDDENBERG, N
    KJESSLER, B
    [J]. GYNECOLOGIC AND OBSTETRIC INVESTIGATION, 1981, 12 (05) : 262 - 266
  • [7] The aetiology of post-traumatic stress following childbirth: a meta-analysis and theoretical framework
    Ayers, S.
    Bond, R.
    Bertullies, S.
    Wijma, K.
    [J]. PSYCHOLOGICAL MEDICINE, 2016, 46 (06) : 1121 - 1134
  • [8] Fear of childbirth, postnatal post-traumatic stress disorder and midwifery care
    Ayers, Susan
    [J]. MIDWIFERY, 2014, 30 (02) : 145 - 148
  • [9] Responding to fear of childbirth
    Bewley, S
    Cockburn, L
    [J]. LANCET, 2002, 359 (9324) : 2128 - 2129
  • [10] Bohren MA, 2015, MISTREATMENT WOMEN C, V12