University-industry collaboration portfolio concentration and focal firms' innovation performance: evidence from China

被引：0
作者：
Zhang, Shuman [1 ,2 ]
Chen, Chao [3 ]
Deng, Cheng [4 ]
机构：
[1] Zhejiang Gongshang Univ, Sch Business Adm, Hangzhou 310018, Peoples R China
[2] Zhejiang Gongshang Univ, Zheshang Res Inst, Hangzhou, Peoples R China
[3] Hohai Univ, Business Sch, Nanjing, Peoples R China
[4] Xi An Jiao Tong Univ, Sch Management, Xian, Peoples R China
来源：
TECHNOLOGY ANALYSIS & STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT | 2024年 / 36卷 / 05期
关键词：
UI collaboration; geographical concentration; firm innovation; alliance portfolio; POLITICALLY CONNECTED CEOS; STATE-OWNED ENTERPRISES; PRODUCT INNOVATION; ALLIANCE PORTFOLIOS; PANEL-DATA; DIVERSITY; OWNERSHIP; CAPABILITY; KNOWLEDGE; INTERPLAY;
D O I：
10.1080/09537325.2022.2067038
中图分类号：
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号：
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要：
It has been a pervasive phenomenon that a firm constructs multiple collaborations with universities and research institutes from diverse geographic regions. This study examines whether and under what conditions university-industry (UI) collaboration portfolio concentration, the geographical concentration of UI collaboration partners, influence focal firms' innovation performance. The results suggest that UI collaboration portfolio concentration is negatively associated with focal firms' innovation performance. Besides, the negative relationship between UI collaboration portfolio concentration and firm innovation performance is stronger for state-owned enterprises (SOEs) than non-SOEs. Moreover, the negative relationship between UI collaboration portfolio concentration and firm innovation performance is stronger for politically connected firms than non-politically connected firms. This study contributes to previous research on alliance portfolios and UI collaborations, and provides some meaningful inspiration for practice.
引用
收藏
页码：975 / 988
页数：14
相关论文
共 50 条
[21]   Motivating business towards innovation: A panel data study using dynamic capability framework [J].
Hameed, Kamran ;
Arshed, Noman ;
Yazdani, Naveed ;
Munir, Mubbasher .
TECHNOLOGY IN SOCIETY, 2021, 65
[22]  
Harrison DA, 2007, ACAD MANAGE REV, V32, P1199, DOI 10.5465/AMR.2007.26586096
[23]   Does combining different types of collaboration always benefit firms? Collaboration, complementarity and product innovation in Norway [J].
Haus-Reve, Silje ;
Fitjar, Rune Dahl ;
Rodriguez-Pose, Andres .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2019, 48 (06) :1476-1486
[24]   Politicians on the board of directors: Do connections affect the bottom line? [J].
Hillman, AJ .
JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT, 2005, 31 (03) :464-481
[25]   A TEST FOR NORMALITY OF OBSERVATIONS AND REGRESSION RESIDUALS [J].
JARQUE, CM ;
BERA, AK .
INTERNATIONAL STATISTICAL REVIEW, 1987, 55 (02) :163-172
[26]   University-industry collaborations and product innovation performance: the moderating effects of absorptive capacity and innovation competencies [J].
Kobarg, Sebastian ;
Stumpf-Wollersheim, Jutta ;
Welpe, Isabell M. .
JOURNAL OF TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER, 2018, 43 (06) :1696-1724
[27]   Intangible assets as drivers of innovation: Empirical evidence on multinational enterprises in German and UK regional systems of innovation [J].
Kramer, Jan-Philipp ;
Marinelli, Elisabetta ;
Iammarino, Simona ;
Diez, Javier Revilla .
TECHNOVATION, 2011, 31 (09) :447-458
[28]   VERTICAL INTEGRATION, INNOVATION, AND ALLIANCE PORTFOLIO SIZE: IMPLICATIONS FOR FIRM PERFORMANCE [J].
Lahiri, Nandini ;
Narayanan, Sriram .
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2013, 34 (09) :1042-1064
[29]   The liability of opaqueness: State ownership and the likelihood of deal completion in international acquisitions by Chinese firms [J].
Li, Jiatao ;
Li, Peixin ;
Wang, Baolian .
STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT JOURNAL, 2019, 40 (02) :303-327
[30]  
Li SH, 2015, J BUS ETHICS, V129, P399, DOI 10.1007/s10551-014-2167-y
12345