Influence of operational parameters (sludge retention time and hydraulic residence time) on the removal of estrogens by membrane bioreactor

被引:29
作者
Estrada-Arriaga, Edson B. [1 ]
Mijaylova, Petia N. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nacl Autonoma Mexico, Fac Ingn, Jiutepec 62550, Morelos, Mexico
[2] Mexican Inst Water Technol, Jiutepec 62550, Morelos, Mexico
关键词
Estrogens; Membrane bioreactor; Sludge retention time; Hydraulic residence time; Nitrification; Adsorption; Fouling; WASTE-WATER TREATMENT; SEWAGE-TREATMENT PLANTS; ENDOCRINE DISRUPTING COMPOUNDS; NITRIFYING ACTIVATED-SLUDGE; TREATMENT WORKS; SYNTHETIC ESTROGENS; STEROID ESTROGENS; DEGRADATION; 17-BETA-ESTRADIOL; PHARMACEUTICALS;
D O I
10.1007/s11356-011-0461-0
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This paper deals with the removal of two natural estrogens, estrone (E1) and 17 beta-estradiol (E2) and a synthetic one 17 alpha ethinylestradiol (EE2) from wastewater in a laboratory-scale membrane bioreactor (MBR). The effects of both solid retention time (SRT) and hydraulic residence time (HRT) were studied using synthetic wastewater in the MBR. At 35, 45, 60, 75, and 95 days, SRT was studied. The HRT was varied in the range of 7-12 h. The results showed that the increases in HRT and SRT enhanced the biodegradation process after adaptation to microorganisms. At HRT of 12 h, the estrogen removals were close to 100% in the MBR. The highest estrogen removals were obtained at SRT of 60 days. Continuous tests showed a linear relationship between nitrification and estrogen removal rates. The most biodegradable compound was the E2. The membrane fouling rates increased with the decreased of SRT and HRT. Optimal process conditions in this work was obtained at the SRT and HRT of 60 days and 12 h, respectively, with high efficient of estrogen removal, nitrification efficiencies, as well as a minimum membrane fouling rate.
引用
收藏
页码:1121 / 1128
页数:8
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]   Fate of estrogens in a municipal sewage treatment plant [J].
Andersen, H ;
Siegrist, H ;
Halling-Sorensen, B ;
Ternes, TA .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2003, 37 (18) :4021-4026
[2]   Monitoring natural and synthetic estrogens at activated sludge sewage treatment plants and in a receiving river water [J].
Baronti, C ;
Curini, R ;
D'Ascenzo, G ;
Di Corcia, A ;
Gentili, A ;
Samperi, R .
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 2000, 34 (24) :5059-5066
[3]   Steroid estrogens in primary and tertiary wastewater treatment plants [J].
Braga, O ;
Smythe, GA ;
Schafer, AI ;
Feltz, AJ .
WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2005, 52 (08) :273-278
[4]   Mitigated membrane fouling in a vertical submerged membrane bioreactor (VSMBR) [J].
Chae, So-Ryong ;
Ahn, Yong-Tae ;
Kang, Seok-Tae ;
Shin, Hang-Sik .
JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE, 2006, 280 (1-2) :572-581
[5]   Quantitative analysis of biological effect on membrane fouling in submerged membrane bioreactor [J].
Cho, J ;
Song, KG ;
Yun, H ;
Ahn, KH ;
Kim, JY ;
Chung, TH .
WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2005, 51 (6-7) :9-18
[6]   The solids retention time - a suitable design parameter to evaluate the capacity of wastewater treatment plants to remove micropollutants [J].
Clara, M ;
Kreuzinger, N ;
Strenn, B ;
Gans, O ;
Kroiss, H .
WATER RESEARCH, 2005, 39 (01) :97-106
[7]   Kinetic parameters for 17α-ethinylestradiol removal by nitrifying activated sludge developed in a membrane bioreactor [J].
Clouzot, L. ;
Doumenq, P. ;
Roche, N. ;
Marrot, B. .
BIORESOURCE TECHNOLOGY, 2010, 101 (16) :6425-6431
[8]  
DJAMILA AH, 2008, WATER RES, V42, P1475
[9]   Does fouling in MBRs depend on SMP? [J].
Drews, A. ;
Vocks, M. ;
Bracklow, U. ;
Iversen, V. ;
Kraume, M. .
DESALINATION, 2008, 231 (1-3) :141-149
[10]  
ESTRADAARRIAGA EB, 2010, 2 IWA YOUNG WAT PROF