Comparative Analysis of Data Modeling Design Tools

被引:7
作者
Carvalho, Goncalo [1 ]
Mykolyshyn, Sergii [1 ]
Cabral, Bruno [1 ]
Bernardino, Jorge [1 ,2 ]
Pereira, Vasco [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Coimbra, Ctr Informat & Syst, Dept Informat Engn, P-3004531 Coimbra, Portugal
[2] Polytech Coimbra, ISEC, P-3030199 Coimbra, Portugal
关键词
Data models; Unified modeling language; Object oriented modeling; Software; Business; Databases; Analytical models; Data modeling; design tools; database management systems; data modeling tools;
D O I
10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3139071
中图分类号
TP [自动化技术、计算机技术];
学科分类号
0812 ;
摘要
Conceptual modeling describes the physical or social aspects of the world abstractly, encompassing the interpretation of data production, gathering, visualization, and analysis. The quality of the data analysis system will limit the excellence of any decision-making process. Thus, accurately specifying the physical data model is essential. The primary goal of our work is to compare tools that can create this physical model. We recognize several types of data models, but we only include the relational data model. We evaluate free and commercial data modeling tools. But it is challenging to decide how to compare them and which elements are crucial. We propose a new approach for software tools' evaluation based on the Business Readiness Rating (BRR) model and the OSSpal evaluation methodology. In this work, we show that this new methodology can be tailored to the needs of each individual developer or team, thus providing proper and meaningful results. Also, by applying this hybrid approach to the evaluation of data modelling tools, we show it can robustly handle the bias from lesser relevant evaluation categories.
引用
收藏
页码:3351 / 3365
页数:15
相关论文
共 26 条
[21]  
Pin-Shan Chen P., 1976, ACM Transactions on Database Systems, V1, P9, DOI 10.1145/320434.320440
[22]  
Saaty T., 1988, Mathematical Models for Decision Support
[23]  
Silberschatz Abraham., 1991, Database system concepts, V7th
[24]  
Simsion G., 2004, Data Modeling Essentials, VThird
[25]  
Thalheim Bernhard., 2000, ENTITY RELATIONSHIP
[26]  
Wasserman A.I., 2017, IFIP INT C OP SOURC, P193, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-3-319-57735-718