Dynamic Monitoring of a Mid-Rise Building by Real-Aperture Radar Interferometer: Advantages and Limitations

被引:16
作者
Alva, Rodrigo E. [1 ]
Pujades, Luis G. [1 ]
Gonzalez-Drigo, Ramon [2 ]
Luzi, Guido [3 ]
Caselles, Oriol [1 ]
Pinzon, Luis A. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Politecn Cataluna, Dept Civil & Environm Engn, C Jordi Girona 1-3, Barcelona 08034, Spain
[2] Univ Politecn Cataluna, Dept Struct Engn, C Jordi Girona 1-3, Barcelona 08034, Spain
[3] Ctr Tecnol Telecomunicac Catalunya, Dept Remote Sensing, Div Geomat, Ave Carl Friedrich Gauss 7, Castelldefels 08860, Spain
关键词
real-aperture radar; modal identification; accelerometers; cross power spectrum; magnitude-squared coherence; buildings; remote sensing; MODAL IDENTIFICATION; COHERENCE; TRANSFORM;
D O I
10.3390/rs12061025
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
In this paper, remote and in situ techniques to estimate the dynamic response of a building to ambient vibration are reported: data acquired through a real-aperture radar (RAR) interferometer and conventional accelerometers are analyzed. A five-story reinforced concrete housing building, which was damaged during the May 11th 2011 Lorca (Spain) earthquake, is used as a case study. The building was monitored using both types of instruments. The dynamic properties of the building are estimated first taking acceleration measurements using a set of 10 high-precision accelerometers installed on the roof of the building. Further, the displacement-time histories, recorded with the RAR device pointing to a corner of the building, are analyzed. Then, the ability and shortcomings of RAR measurements to deal with the fundamental frequencies of vibration of the structure are investigated. The advantages and limitations of from-inside (accelerometric) and from-outside (RAR) measurements are highlighted and discussed. A relevant conclusion is that, after strong earthquakes, RAR may be an interesting and useful tool, as it allows surveying the structural response of mid-rise buildings remotely, without the need to enter the structures, which may be dangerous for inspectors or technicians in cases of severely damaged buildings. Given that the instrumented building suffered significant damage, the ability of these kinds of measurements to detect damage is also discussed.
引用
收藏
页数:22
相关论文
共 44 条
  • [1] Alva R.E., 2019, P ECCOMAS THEM C COM
  • [2] [Anonymous], 1998, FEMA306 APPL TECHN C
  • [3] [Anonymous], 2005, FEMA440 APPL TECHN C
  • [4] [Anonymous], 2000, RECOMMENDED SEISMIC
  • [5] Bendat J. S., 1980, ENG APPL CORRELATION, P315, DOI DOI 10.2307/1267582
  • [6] Benesty J, 2009, SPRINGER TOP SIGN PR, V2, P37, DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-00296-0_5
  • [7] Application of Particle Motion Technique to Structural Modal Identification of Heritage Buildings
    Caselles, Oriol
    Martinez, Guillermo
    Clapes, Jaume
    Roca, Pere
    de la Vega Perez-Gracia, Maria
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ARCHITECTURAL HERITAGE, 2015, 9 (03) : 310 - 323
  • [8] Wind-induced vibration analysis and remote monitoring test of wind turbine power tower
    Chen, Aijun
    He, Guojing
    [J]. ADVANCES IN CIVIL INFRASTRUCTURE ENGINEERING, PTS 1 AND 2, 2013, 639-640 : 293 - 296
  • [9] Quantifying the benefits of building instruments to FEMA P-58 rapid post-earthquake damage and loss predictions
    Cremen, Gemma
    Baker, Jack W.
    [J]. ENGINEERING STRUCTURES, 2018, 176 : 243 - 253
  • [10] An introduction to structural health monitoring
    Farrar, Charles R.
    Worden, Keith
    [J]. PHILOSOPHICAL TRANSACTIONS OF THE ROYAL SOCIETY A-MATHEMATICAL PHYSICAL AND ENGINEERING SCIENCES, 2007, 365 (1851): : 303 - 315