A Common Social Distance Scale for Robots and Humans

被引:6
|
作者
Banks, Jaime [1 ]
Edwards, Autumn [2 ,3 ]
机构
[1] Texas Tech Univ, Coll Media & Commun, Lubbock, TX 79409 USA
[2] Western Michigan Univ, Commun, Kalamazoo, MI 49008 USA
[3] Western Michigan Univ, Commun & Social Robot Labs, Kalamazoo, MI 49008 USA
来源
2019 28TH IEEE INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ROBOT AND HUMAN INTERACTIVE COMMUNICATION (RO-MAN) | 2019年
关键词
D O I
10.1109/ro-man46459.2019.8956316
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
From keeping robots as in-home helpers to banning their presence or functions, a person's willingness to engage in variably intimate interactions are signals of social distance: the degree of felt understanding of and intimacy with an individual or group that characterizes pre-social and social connections. To date, social distance has been examined through surrogate metrics not actually representing the construct (e.g., self-disclosure or physical proximity). To address this gap between operations and measurement, this project details a four-stage social distance scale development project, inclusive of systematic item pool-generation, candidate item ratings for laypersons thinking about social distance, testing of candidate items via scalogram and initial validity analyses, and final testing for cumulative structure and predictive validity. The final metric yields a 15-item (18, counting applications with a 'none' option), three-dimension scale for physical distance, relational distance, and conversational distance.
引用
收藏
页数:6
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] A Common Cortical Metric for Spatial, Temporal, and Social Distance
    Parkinson, Carolyn
    Liu, Shari
    Wheatley, Thalia
    JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE, 2014, 34 (05): : 1979 - 1987
  • [32] Could Social Robots Make Us Kinder or Crueller to Humans and Animals?
    Coghlan, Simon
    Vetere, Frank
    Waycott, Jenny
    Barbosa Neves, Barbara
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SOCIAL ROBOTICS, 2019, 11 (05) : 741 - 751
  • [33] Who is Best at Mediating a Social Conflict? Comparing Robots, Screens and Humans
    Druckman, Daniel
    Adrian, Lin
    Damholdt, Malene Flensborg
    Filzmoser, Michael
    Koszegi, Sabine T.
    Seibt, Johanna
    Vestergaard, Christina
    GROUP DECISION AND NEGOTIATION, 2021, 30 (02) : 395 - 426
  • [34] A Sense of Interaction in Humans and Robots: From Visual Perception to Social Cognition
    Sciutti, Alessandra
    Noceti, Nicoletta
    IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON COGNITIVE AND DEVELOPMENTAL SYSTEMS, 2018, 10 (04) : 839 - 842
  • [35] Could Social Robots Make Us Kinder or Crueller to Humans and Animals?
    Simon Coghlan
    Frank Vetere
    Jenny Waycott
    Barbara Barbosa Neves
    International Journal of Social Robotics, 2019, 11 : 741 - 751
  • [36] Who is Best at Mediating a Social Conflict? Comparing Robots, Screens and Humans
    Daniel Druckman
    Lin Adrian
    Malene Flensborg Damholdt
    Michael Filzmoser
    Sabine T. Koszegi
    Johanna Seibt
    Christina Vestergaard
    Group Decision and Negotiation, 2021, 30 : 395 - 426
  • [37] Humans take the visuospatial perspective of robots and objects that imply social presence
    Wahn, Basil
    Wiese, Eva
    ACTA PSYCHOLOGICA, 2025, 254
  • [38] How to Touch Humans Guidelines for Social Agents and Robots that can Touch
    van Erp, Jan B. F.
    Toet, Alexander
    2013 HUMAINE ASSOCIATION CONFERENCE ON AFFECTIVE COMPUTING AND INTELLIGENT INTERACTION (ACII), 2013, : 780 - 785
  • [39] Game theoretical trajectory planning enhances social acceptability of robots by humans
    Galati, Giada
    Primatesta, Stefano
    Grammatico, Sergio
    Macri, Simone
    Rizzo, Alessandro
    SCIENTIFIC REPORTS, 2022, 12 (01)
  • [40] An Approach of Social Navigation Based on Proxemics for Crowded Environments of Humans and Robots
    Daza, Marcos
    Barrios-Aranibar, Dennis
    Diaz-Amado, Jose
    Cardinale, Yudith
    Vilasboas, Joao
    MICROMACHINES, 2021, 12 (02)