Critical Success Factors and Barriers for Lightweight Software Process Improvement in Agile Development A Literature Review

被引:0
|
作者
Kouzari, Elia [1 ]
Gerogiannis, Vassilis C. [2 ]
Stamelos, Ioannis [1 ]
Kakarontzas, George [3 ]
机构
[1] Aristotle Univ Thessaloniki, Dept Informat, Thessaloniki, Greece
[2] Technol Educ Inst Thessaly, Dept Business Adm, Larisa, Greece
[3] Technol Educ Inst Thessaly, Dept Comp Sci & Engn, Larisa, Greece
来源
2015 10TH INTERNATIONAL JOINT CONFERENCE ON SOFTWARE TECHNOLOGIES (ICSOFT), VOL 1 | 2015年
关键词
Software Process Improvement; Agile Development; Critical Success Factors; Barriers; Return on Investment; IMPLEMENTATION;
D O I
暂无
中图分类号
TP31 [计算机软件];
学科分类号
081202 ; 0835 ;
摘要
The majority of software development companies are significantly benefitted by adopting software process improvement (SPI). This has been extensively addressed both in terms of research and established standards. In particular, the need for SPI in the context of Small and Medium-sized Enterprises (SMEs) led a lot of researchers to focus on this area. SMEs struggle daily to survive in a very competitive environment and their distinguishing characteristics such as the small number of employees, the flat and small organizational structure and the flexibility that governs them make it hard for them to adopt and implement SPI. On the same spirit, their distinguishing characteristics are also those that make SMEs an ideal environment for the adoption of agile methodologies. The agility that governs SMEs allows flexibility in every process they apply and, thus, promotes lightweight SPI approaches in order to remain on the battle fields of competition. In this article, we examine the special characteristics SMEs have and highlight critical success factors that should be taken advantage of and barriers that could be avoided during SPI, as they are presented in the relevant literature. In addition, we examine how critical success factors of SPI could positively affect a film's Return on Investment and, consequently, help the film survive in the long-term.
引用
收藏
页码:151 / 159
页数:9
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Using Grounded Theory to Acquire Knowledge About Critical Success Factors for Conducting Software Process Improvement Implementation Initiatives
    Montoni, Mariano Angel
    Cavalcanti da Rocha, Ana Regina
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT, 2011, 7 (03) : 43 - 60
  • [32] Instrument for measuring the key factors of success in software process improvement
    Dybå T.
    Empirical Software Engineering, 2000, 5 (04) : 357 - 390
  • [33] An Empirical Framework of key Success Factors for Software Process Improvement
    Bunditwongrat, Nuntarat
    Thongmak, Mathupayas
    Ngarmyarn, Atcharawan
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE 2ND INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON INFORMATION MANAGEMENT AND EVALUATION, 2011, : 82 - 90
  • [34] A comparative study of software process improvement implementation success factors
    Niazi, Mahmood
    JOURNAL OF SOFTWARE-EVOLUTION AND PROCESS, 2015, 27 (09) : 700 - 722
  • [35] Towards Agile Development of Critical Software
    Gorski, Janusz
    Lukasiewicz, Katarzyna
    SOFTWARE ENGINEERING FOR RESILIENT SYSTEMS, SERENE 2013, 2013, 8166 : 48 - 55
  • [36] Identifying the critical success factors of agile NPD process in Iranian Manufacturing Enterprises
    Hosseini, Seyed S. M.
    Fekri, R.
    Ahmadi, Ali A.
    KUWAIT JOURNAL OF SCIENCE & ENGINEERING, 2009, 36 (1B): : 231 - 246
  • [37] A survey study of critical success factors in agile software projects in former Yugoslavia IT companies
    Stankovic, Dragan
    Nikolic, Vesna
    Djordjevic, Miodrag
    Cao, Dac-Buu
    JOURNAL OF SYSTEMS AND SOFTWARE, 2013, 86 (06) : 1663 - 1678
  • [39] Critical Success Factors for Data Virtualization: A Literature Review
    Gottlieb, Matthias
    Shraideh, Marwin
    Fuhrmann, Isabel
    Boehm, Markus
    Krcmar, Helmut
    ISECURE-ISC INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF INFORMATION SECURITY, 2019, 11 (03): : 131 - 137
  • [40] Multivocal Literature Review on DevOps critical success factors
    Azad, Nasreen
    Hyrynsalmi, Sami
    PROCEEDINGS OF 2024 28TH INTERNATION CONFERENCE ON EVALUATION AND ASSESSMENT IN SOFTWARE ENGINEERING, EASE 2024, 2024, : 520 - 527