Legitimation Work Within a Cross-Sector Social Partnership

被引:47
|
作者
Rueede, Dominik [1 ]
Kreutzer, Karin [1 ]
机构
[1] EBS Business Sch, Oestrich Winkel, Hesse, Germany
关键词
Cross-sector social partnerships; Institutional theory; Legitimacy; Legitimation work; ORGANIZATIONAL LEGITIMACY; IMPRESSION MANAGEMENT; INSTITUTIONAL THEORY; MODEL; RESPONSIBILITY; STRATEGIES; TRANSFORMATION; ILLEGITIMACY; PERSPECTIVE; EVOLUTION;
D O I
10.1007/s10551-014-2072-4
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This study illuminates how a cross-sector social partnership legitimizes itself toward multiple internal and external stakeholders. Within a single-case study design, we collected retrospective and real time data on the partnership between Deutsche Post DHL and The United Nations Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs. Within this partnership, Deutsche Post DHL provides corporate volunteers that support disaster response after natural disasters on a pro bono basis. The main objects that needed legitimacy as well as the audiences from which legitimacy was mainly sought changed over time. In addition, we identified legitimation work as occurring across objects, audiences, and time. Thus, we introduce legitimation work as the purposeful effort of the legitimacy seeker to avoid certain issues while ensuring other issues that are of importance to the conferrer of legitimacy. These findings contribute to micro-level considerations within institutional theory which view legitimacy as socially constructed between legitimacy seeker and conferrer. Hence, we add another perspective on legitimation to the previously existing conceptualizations of legitimacy as a deterministic consequence of institutionalization.
引用
收藏
页码:39 / 58
页数:20
相关论文
共 50 条
  • [31] Social entrepreneurial opportunity and active stakeholder participation: Resource mobilization in enterprising conveners of cross-sector social partnerships
    McDermott, Kevin
    Kurucz, Elizabeth C.
    Colbert, Barry A.
    JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION, 2018, 183 : 121 - 131
  • [32] When reach exceeds touch: Student experiences in a cross-sector community-based academic-practice partnership
    Breen, Laurel Janssen
    Diamond-Caravella, Monica
    Moore, Geraldine
    Wruck, Michelle
    Guglielmo, Claudia
    Little, Anne
    Tedeschi, Pamela
    Zacharia, Marianne
    Cataletto, Mary
    PUBLIC HEALTH NURSING, 2019, 36 (03) : 429 - 438
  • [33] Benefits of Cross-sector Partnerships in Markets at the Base of the Pyramid
    Schuster, Tassilo
    Holtbruegge, Dirk
    BUSINESS STRATEGY AND THE ENVIRONMENT, 2014, 23 (03) : 188 - 203
  • [34] Toward Collaborative Cross-Sector Business Models for Sustainability
    Pedersen, Esben Rahbek Gjerdrum
    Luedeke-Freund, Florian
    Henriques, Irene
    Seitanidi, M. May
    BUSINESS & SOCIETY, 2021, 60 (05) : 1039 - 1058
  • [35] Cross-sector collaboration, nonprofit readiness, and sustainability transitions
    Ba, Yuhao
    Nair, Sreeja
    Kedia, Mohnish
    ENVIRONMENTAL INNOVATION AND SOCIETAL TRANSITIONS, 2024, 53
  • [36] Designing and Implementing Cross-Sector Collaborations: Needed and Challenging
    Bryson, John M.
    Crosby, Barbara C.
    Stone, Melissa Middleton
    PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION REVIEW, 2015, 75 (05) : 647 - 663
  • [37] A cross-sector review on the use of value stream mapping
    Shou, Wenchi
    Wang, Jun
    Wu, Peng
    Wang, Xiangyu
    Chong, Heap-Yih
    INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION RESEARCH, 2017, 55 (13) : 3906 - 3928
  • [38] Shifts in Mindset and Practice Are Key to Cross-Sector Partnerships
    Lockwood, Erin
    Peterson, Lori
    GENERATIONS-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY ON AGING, 2018, 42 (01): : 65 - 68
  • [39] Integrative leadership and the creation and maintenance of cross-sector collaborations
    Crosby, Barbara C.
    Bryson, John M.
    LEADERSHIP QUARTERLY, 2010, 21 (02) : 211 - 230
  • [40] Managing Diversity Differently: The External Environment and Cross-Sector Differences in Diversity Management
    McCrea, Austin M.
    Zhu, Ling
    Johansen, Morgen S.
    JOURNAL OF PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION RESEARCH AND THEORY, 2022, 32 (02) : 436 - 454