Non-axillary breast cancer recurrences after sentinel node biopsy

被引:11
作者
Van Rijk, MC
Nieweg, OE
Olmos, RAV
Rutgers, EJT
Hoefnagel, CA
Kroon, BBR
机构
[1] Netherlands Canc Inst, Dept Surg, NL-1066 CX Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Netherlands Canc Inst, Dept Nucl Med, NL-1066 CX Amsterdam, Netherlands
关键词
breast neoplasms; sentinel lymph node biopsy; neoplasm recurrence; local;
D O I
10.1002/jso.20407
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background and Objectives: The primary lymphatic pathway of patients with breast cancer is toward the axilla, but lymph drainage is also possible towards the internal mammary chain and the supraclavicular fossa. In the current article, the development of breast cancer recurrences at these two sites after sentinel lymph node biopsy is reviewed. Methods: Since 1997, 803 patients underwent sentinel lymph node biopsy with intratumoral injection of Tc-99m-nanocolloid and patent blue dye in The Netherlands Cancer Institute. All sentinel nodes as visualized on the lymphoscintigraphy images were pursued. The patients were followed prospectively for a median period of 34 months. Patients with a lymph node recurrence outside the axilla were identified and their lymphatic mapping procedures were reviewed. Results: Four of the 803 patients (0.5%) developed regional lymph node recurrences outside the axilla. One recurrence was located in the internal mammary chain, the other three in the supraclavicular bed. One or two of these patients also had an axillary recurrence. The sentinel node procedure had failed in two of the four patients. Conclusion: The incidence of nodal recurrences outside the axilla is low. Although all extra-axillary sentinel nodes were pursued, some of these recurrences concern missed sentinel nodes that harbor metastasis. Identification of all sentinel nodes and subsequent treatment of the involved basins may reduce the risk of breast cancer recurrences in these unusual locations.
引用
收藏
页码:292 / 298
页数:7
相关论文
共 19 条
  • [1] Sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer: Guidelines and pitfalls of lymphoscintigraphy and gamma probe detection
    Borgstein, P
    Pijpers, R
    Comans, EF
    van Diest, PJ
    Boom, RP
    Meijer, S
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 1998, 186 (03) : 275 - 283
  • [2] Does ultrasonographic examination of the axilla in the preoperative screening of breast cancer patients reduce the number of sentinel lymph node procedures?
    Deurloo, EE
    Tanis, PJ
    Gilhuijs, KGA
    Muller, SH
    Kröger, R
    Peterse, JL
    Rutgers, EJT
    Olmos, RV
    Kool, LJS
    [J]. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 2002, 38 : S58 - S58
  • [3] Lymphatic drainage patterns from the breast
    Estourgie, SH
    Nieweg, OE
    Olmos, RAV
    Rutgers, EJT
    Kroon, BBR
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGERY, 2004, 239 (02) : 232 - 237
  • [4] Should the hunt for internal mammary chain sentinel nodes begin? An evaluation of 150 breast cancer patients
    Estourgie, SH
    Tanis, PJ
    Nieweg, OE
    Olmos, RAV
    Rutgers, EJT
    Kroon, BBR
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2003, 10 (08) : 935 - 941
  • [5] ESTOURGIE SH, 2002, EUR J SURG ONCOL, V28, P304
  • [6] ESTOURGIE SH, 2004, ANN C EUR ASS NUCL M
  • [7] The definition of a sentinel node
    Nieweg, OE
    Tanis, PJ
    Kroon, BBR
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2001, 8 (06) : 538 - 541
  • [8] Increased false negative rates in sentinel lymph node biopsies in patients with multi-focal breast cancer
    Ozmen, V
    Muslumanoglu, M
    Cabioglu, N
    Tuzlali, S
    Ilhan, R
    Igci, A
    Kecer, M
    Bozfakioglu, Y
    Dagoglu, T
    [J]. BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 2002, 76 (03) : 237 - 244
  • [9] Sentinel node biopsy in ductal carcinoma in situ patients
    Pendas, S
    Dauway, E
    Giuliano, R
    Ku, NN
    Cox, CE
    Reintgen, DS
    [J]. ANNALS OF SURGICAL ONCOLOGY, 2000, 7 (01) : 15 - 20
  • [10] Altered lymphatic drainage after lymphadenectomy or radiotherapy of the axilla in patients with breast cancer
    Perre, CI
    Hoefnagel, CA
    Kroon, BBR
    Zoetmulder, FAN
    Rutgers, EJT
    [J]. BRITISH JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1996, 83 (09) : 1258 - 1258